Physiotherapists’ experience with online group exercise classes: A nationwide survey

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
E. Cronin, Maire McCallion, K. Monaghan
{"title":"Physiotherapists’ experience with online group exercise classes: A nationwide survey","authors":"E. Cronin, Maire McCallion, K. Monaghan","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The Covid-19 pandemic provided a research opportunity to explore online group exercise programmes in larger numbers while restrictions on group gatherings were in place. An online survey was conducted with Irish Physiotherapists to ascertain their views on online group exercise programmes and the methods they employed to conduct their online classes in order to guide Physiotherapists with future care delivery. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was employed using a cross-sectional national online survey of Physiotherapists in Ireland. The survey collected both qualitative and quantitative data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the ordinal and continuous data and free-text responses were analysed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: In total, 81 Physiotherapists completed the surveys. The majority of Physiotherapists (62% ) feel a blended or hybrid model is the best option for the future. Convenience and decreased travel were cited as the main advantages of online classes. Physiotherapists cited in-person classes as being of higher teaching quality with improved safety and social interaction. Physiotherapists indicated that very little staff or technological resources were needed for their online classes and serious adverse events during the classes were extremely infrequent. CONCLUSION: Online group exercise programmes were well received by Physiotherapists, although the majority of those questioned believe a mixture of both online and in person exercise classes should be offered going forward.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Covid-19 pandemic provided a research opportunity to explore online group exercise programmes in larger numbers while restrictions on group gatherings were in place. An online survey was conducted with Irish Physiotherapists to ascertain their views on online group exercise programmes and the methods they employed to conduct their online classes in order to guide Physiotherapists with future care delivery. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was employed using a cross-sectional national online survey of Physiotherapists in Ireland. The survey collected both qualitative and quantitative data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the ordinal and continuous data and free-text responses were analysed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: In total, 81 Physiotherapists completed the surveys. The majority of Physiotherapists (62% ) feel a blended or hybrid model is the best option for the future. Convenience and decreased travel were cited as the main advantages of online classes. Physiotherapists cited in-person classes as being of higher teaching quality with improved safety and social interaction. Physiotherapists indicated that very little staff or technological resources were needed for their online classes and serious adverse events during the classes were extremely infrequent. CONCLUSION: Online group exercise programmes were well received by Physiotherapists, although the majority of those questioned believe a mixture of both online and in person exercise classes should be offered going forward.
物理治疗师对在线团体运动课程的体验:一项全国性调查
导言:2019冠状病毒病大流行提供了一个研究机会,在对团体聚会实施限制的情况下,探索更大规模的在线团体锻炼计划。对爱尔兰物理治疗师进行了一项在线调查,以确定他们对在线小组锻炼计划的看法,以及他们在进行在线课程时采用的方法,以指导物理治疗师未来的护理服务。方法:采用混合方法设计,对爱尔兰的物理治疗师进行横断面全国在线调查。这项调查收集了定性和定量数据。描述性统计用于总结顺序和连续数据,使用常规内容分析分析自由文本响应。结果:共有81名物理治疗师完成了调查。大多数物理治疗师(62%)认为混合或混合模式是未来的最佳选择。在线课程的主要优点是方便和减少旅行。物理治疗师认为,面对面的课堂教学质量更高,安全性更高,社交互动也更好。物理治疗师表示,他们的在线课程只需要很少的员工或技术资源,并且在课程中很少发生严重的不良事件。结论:在线团体锻炼项目受到物理治疗师的欢迎,尽管大多数受访者认为未来应该提供在线和面对面锻炼课程的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信