Constructing the medical paper evaluation system by bibliometrics

Hongxia Wang
{"title":"Constructing the medical paper evaluation system by bibliometrics","authors":"Hongxia Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nConstructing a medical paper evaluation system based on bibliometrics. \n \n \nMethods \nTaking medical papers as the research object, five evaluation indexes were selected by expert investigation, including paper type, periodical type, number of other citations, impact factors and periodical division. The weight of evaluation index is determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). At last a high level of peer evaluation index F1000 is used to give an example analysis and verification. \n \n \nResults \nThe score of medical papers evaluation system is basically consistent with the recommendation of F1000 papers. \n \n \nConclusions \nIt is feasible to replace peer qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation system based on Bibliometric index in medical paper evaluation. \n \n \nKey words: \nBibliometrics; Index; Paper; Evaluation","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"89-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Constructing a medical paper evaluation system based on bibliometrics. Methods Taking medical papers as the research object, five evaluation indexes were selected by expert investigation, including paper type, periodical type, number of other citations, impact factors and periodical division. The weight of evaluation index is determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). At last a high level of peer evaluation index F1000 is used to give an example analysis and verification. Results The score of medical papers evaluation system is basically consistent with the recommendation of F1000 papers. Conclusions It is feasible to replace peer qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation system based on Bibliometric index in medical paper evaluation. Key words: Bibliometrics; Index; Paper; Evaluation
用文献计量学方法构建医学论文评价体系
目的构建基于文献计量学的医学论文评价体系。方法以医学论文为研究对象,通过专家调查,选择论文类型、期刊类型、其他被引次数、影响因子、期刊划分等5个评价指标。采用层次分析法确定评价指标的权重。最后利用高水平的同行评价指标F1000进行了实例分析和验证。结果医学论文评价体系评分与F1000篇推荐评分基本一致。结论在医学论文评价中,以文献计量指标为基础的定量评价体系代替同行定性评价是可行的。关键词:文献计量学;指数;纸;评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3322
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信