Phenotypic Features and Inheritance Pattern of Emanuel Syndrome: An Indian Perspective

Q4 Medicine
B. Koshy, V. Kamath, V. Srivastava, M. Chacko, S. Yuvarani, S. Oommen
{"title":"Phenotypic Features and Inheritance Pattern of Emanuel Syndrome: An Indian Perspective","authors":"B. Koshy, V. Kamath, V. Srivastava, M. Chacko, S. Yuvarani, S. Oommen","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and objective: To study the phenotypic features and inheritance patterns in children diagnosed with Emanuel syndrome (ES). Materials and methods: All children who underwent cytogenetic analysis at the Christian Medical College, Vellore and whose karyotypes showed the supernumerary chromosome 22 derived from an unbalanced translocation (11;22)(q23;q11.2) were included. Karyotypes of family members were retrieved from hospital records. Metaphases were obtained from phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood cultured using standard protocols. At least 20 Giemsa-banded metaphases were analyzed and reported in accordance with the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature. The clinical features and imaging findings were retrieved from our medical records. The karyotype findings of parents and family history including the obstetric history of all mothers were recorded. Results: There were eight children, three girls and five boys, all of whom were from unrelated families. The age at presentation ranged from 8 months to 8 years of age. Three families presented with significant family history in the form of previous sibling deaths, recurrent abortions in the mother, and maternal siblings’ death. All eight children presented with global developmental delay. Preauricular sinus was found in six children (6/8,75%), while microcephaly and hypotonia in five each (5/8,62.5%). More than half of our children presented with structural cardiac and brain malformations. In three children, the der(22) was found to have originated from a maternal source of the t(11;22). All three mothers who harbored this translocation were phenotypically normal. Conclusion: The characteristic clinical features of ES found in our study included preauricular sinus, microcephaly, hypotonia, cardiac defects, and structural brain malformations. The maternal source of the t(11;22) was the commonest mode of inheritance among children diagnosed with ES. Clinical significance: Emanuel syndrome is a rare syndrome and it is extremely important to identify the phenotypic features of this clinical entity since early intervention can aid in appropriate counselling and offering prenatal testing. The majority of children diagnosed with ES were found to have inherited this genetic defect due to a translocation (11;22) running in the family. Hence, a clear understanding of the reproductive outcomes of the t(11;22) is of vital importance in counseling the family members and offering prenatal testing.","PeriodicalId":38998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim and objective: To study the phenotypic features and inheritance patterns in children diagnosed with Emanuel syndrome (ES). Materials and methods: All children who underwent cytogenetic analysis at the Christian Medical College, Vellore and whose karyotypes showed the supernumerary chromosome 22 derived from an unbalanced translocation (11;22)(q23;q11.2) were included. Karyotypes of family members were retrieved from hospital records. Metaphases were obtained from phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood cultured using standard protocols. At least 20 Giemsa-banded metaphases were analyzed and reported in accordance with the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature. The clinical features and imaging findings were retrieved from our medical records. The karyotype findings of parents and family history including the obstetric history of all mothers were recorded. Results: There were eight children, three girls and five boys, all of whom were from unrelated families. The age at presentation ranged from 8 months to 8 years of age. Three families presented with significant family history in the form of previous sibling deaths, recurrent abortions in the mother, and maternal siblings’ death. All eight children presented with global developmental delay. Preauricular sinus was found in six children (6/8,75%), while microcephaly and hypotonia in five each (5/8,62.5%). More than half of our children presented with structural cardiac and brain malformations. In three children, the der(22) was found to have originated from a maternal source of the t(11;22). All three mothers who harbored this translocation were phenotypically normal. Conclusion: The characteristic clinical features of ES found in our study included preauricular sinus, microcephaly, hypotonia, cardiac defects, and structural brain malformations. The maternal source of the t(11;22) was the commonest mode of inheritance among children diagnosed with ES. Clinical significance: Emanuel syndrome is a rare syndrome and it is extremely important to identify the phenotypic features of this clinical entity since early intervention can aid in appropriate counselling and offering prenatal testing. The majority of children diagnosed with ES were found to have inherited this genetic defect due to a translocation (11;22) running in the family. Hence, a clear understanding of the reproductive outcomes of the t(11;22) is of vital importance in counseling the family members and offering prenatal testing.
伊曼纽尔综合征的表型特征和遗传模式:一个印度的视角
目的与目的:探讨伊曼纽尔综合征(ES)患儿的表型特征及遗传模式。材料和方法:所有在Vellore基督教医学院接受细胞遗传学分析的儿童,其核型显示来自不平衡易位的多余22号染色体(11;22)(q23;q11.2)被纳入。从医院记录中检索家庭成员的核型。采用标准方案从植物血凝素刺激的外周血中获得中期。根据国际人类细胞基因组命名法,至少有20个giemsa带状中期被分析和报道。临床特征和影像学结果从我们的医疗记录中检索。记录父母的核型和家族史,包括所有母亲的产科史。结果:8名儿童,3名女孩,5名男孩,均来自无血缘关系家庭。发病年龄为8个月至8岁。三个家庭有明显的家族史,表现为以前的兄弟姐妹死亡、母亲反复流产和母兄弟姐妹死亡。所有8名儿童均表现出全面发育迟缓。耳前窦6例(6/8,75%),小头畸形和低张力各5例(5/8,62.5%)。超过一半的儿童表现出结构性心脏和大脑畸形。在三个孩子中,发现der(22)起源于母体的t(11;22)。所有三个携带这种易位的母亲在表型上都是正常的。结论:本组ES的特征性临床表现包括耳前窦、小头畸形、低张力、心脏缺陷和脑结构性畸形。母源t(11;22)是诊断为ES的儿童中最常见的遗传模式。临床意义:伊曼纽尔综合征是一种罕见的综合征,识别这种临床实体的表型特征非常重要,因为早期干预有助于适当的咨询和提供产前检查。大多数被诊断为ES的儿童被发现由于易位而遗传了这种基因缺陷(11;22)。因此,清楚地了解t(11;22)的生殖结果对于咨询家庭成员和提供产前检查至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信