Comparison of inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness in Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns

Samikshya Sangroula, Ravi Kumar Mahto, Rajeev Mishra, Suja Shrestha, D. Kafle
{"title":"Comparison of inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness in Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns","authors":"Samikshya Sangroula, Ravi Kumar Mahto, Rajeev Mishra, Suja Shrestha, D. Kafle","doi":"10.3126/ojn.v12i2.51480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Knowledge of the safe zone of mini-implant placement guides clinicians in choosing where to place mini-implants. Several studies evaluated the safe zone for mini-implants placement, but only a very few previous studies have taken different skeletal patterns into account when assessing measurements.\nObjective: The purpose of this cross-sectional, comparative study was to compare the inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness in Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns.\nMaterials and Methods: A total of 62 CBCT images of patients with Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion were obtained from the records of the department of Oral medicine and Radiology, Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital. The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were measured at four different heights (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) from the CEJ towards the apex. These measurements were measured between different skeletal pattern and gender with independent t-test. The intergroup comparison at different height from CEJ was done with ANOVAfollowed by Tukey's post-hoc test to see the difference within the category.\nResult: There was a statistically significant difference observed in the inter-radicular distance between the maxillary first and second premolars at a height of 6 mm between Class I and Class II malocclusion patterns (p = 0.03). There were differences observed in the inter-radicular distance of the mandible at a different height based on skeletal malocclusion pattern, which was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The buccal cortical bone thickness between the maxillary central and lateral incisors at the height of 2 mm from CEJ between Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The buccal cortical bone thickness of the mandible at different heights based on skeletal malocclusion pattern there were differences observed which were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).\nConclusion: The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness could be influenced by different skeletal patterns and tend to increase from the CEJ to the apex in both Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.","PeriodicalId":31197,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v12i2.51480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge of the safe zone of mini-implant placement guides clinicians in choosing where to place mini-implants. Several studies evaluated the safe zone for mini-implants placement, but only a very few previous studies have taken different skeletal patterns into account when assessing measurements. Objective: The purpose of this cross-sectional, comparative study was to compare the inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness in Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns. Materials and Methods: A total of 62 CBCT images of patients with Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion were obtained from the records of the department of Oral medicine and Radiology, Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital. The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were measured at four different heights (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) from the CEJ towards the apex. These measurements were measured between different skeletal pattern and gender with independent t-test. The intergroup comparison at different height from CEJ was done with ANOVAfollowed by Tukey's post-hoc test to see the difference within the category. Result: There was a statistically significant difference observed in the inter-radicular distance between the maxillary first and second premolars at a height of 6 mm between Class I and Class II malocclusion patterns (p = 0.03). There were differences observed in the inter-radicular distance of the mandible at a different height based on skeletal malocclusion pattern, which was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The buccal cortical bone thickness between the maxillary central and lateral incisors at the height of 2 mm from CEJ between Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The buccal cortical bone thickness of the mandible at different heights based on skeletal malocclusion pattern there were differences observed which were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness could be influenced by different skeletal patterns and tend to increase from the CEJ to the apex in both Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.
I类和II类骨骼错牙合模式中根间距离和颊皮质骨厚度的比较
简介:微型植入物放置安全区的知识指导临床医生选择放置微型植入物的位置。几项研究评估了小型植入物放置的安全区,但只有极少数先前的研究在评估测量时考虑了不同的骨骼模式。目的:本横断面比较研究的目的是比较I类和II类骨骼错牙合模式下的根间距离和颊皮质骨厚度。材料与方法:从加德满都大学教学医院口腔医学与放射科的记录中获得62例一、二类骨性错牙合患者的CBCT图像。在从CEJ到根尖的四个不同高度(2、4、6和8mm)测量根间距离和颊皮质骨厚度。这些测量是用独立t检验在不同骨骼模式和性别之间进行测量的。在CEJ不同高度的组间比较采用ANOVA进行,然后进行Tukey的事后检验,以查看类别内的差异。结果:上颌第一前磨牙和第二前磨牙在6mm高度处的根间距离在I类和II类错牙合模式之间存在统计学显著差异(p=0.03),无统计学意义(p>0.05)。上颌中切牙和侧切牙在距CEJ 2mm高度处的颊皮质骨厚度在I类和II类骨骼错牙合模式之间具有统计学意义(p=0.01)结论:根间距离和颊皮质骨厚度受不同骨骼形态的影响,在I类和II类骨骼形态中,从CEJ到根尖都有增加的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书