Samikshya Sangroula, Ravi Kumar Mahto, Rajeev Mishra, Suja Shrestha, D. Kafle
{"title":"Comparison of inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness in Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns","authors":"Samikshya Sangroula, Ravi Kumar Mahto, Rajeev Mishra, Suja Shrestha, D. Kafle","doi":"10.3126/ojn.v12i2.51480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Knowledge of the safe zone of mini-implant placement guides clinicians in choosing where to place mini-implants. Several studies evaluated the safe zone for mini-implants placement, but only a very few previous studies have taken different skeletal patterns into account when assessing measurements.\nObjective: The purpose of this cross-sectional, comparative study was to compare the inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness in Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns.\nMaterials and Methods: A total of 62 CBCT images of patients with Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion were obtained from the records of the department of Oral medicine and Radiology, Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital. The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were measured at four different heights (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) from the CEJ towards the apex. These measurements were measured between different skeletal pattern and gender with independent t-test. The intergroup comparison at different height from CEJ was done with ANOVAfollowed by Tukey's post-hoc test to see the difference within the category.\nResult: There was a statistically significant difference observed in the inter-radicular distance between the maxillary first and second premolars at a height of 6 mm between Class I and Class II malocclusion patterns (p = 0.03). There were differences observed in the inter-radicular distance of the mandible at a different height based on skeletal malocclusion pattern, which was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The buccal cortical bone thickness between the maxillary central and lateral incisors at the height of 2 mm from CEJ between Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The buccal cortical bone thickness of the mandible at different heights based on skeletal malocclusion pattern there were differences observed which were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).\nConclusion: The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness could be influenced by different skeletal patterns and tend to increase from the CEJ to the apex in both Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.","PeriodicalId":31197,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v12i2.51480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Knowledge of the safe zone of mini-implant placement guides clinicians in choosing where to place mini-implants. Several studies evaluated the safe zone for mini-implants placement, but only a very few previous studies have taken different skeletal patterns into account when assessing measurements.
Objective: The purpose of this cross-sectional, comparative study was to compare the inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness in Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns.
Materials and Methods: A total of 62 CBCT images of patients with Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion were obtained from the records of the department of Oral medicine and Radiology, Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital. The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness were measured at four different heights (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) from the CEJ towards the apex. These measurements were measured between different skeletal pattern and gender with independent t-test. The intergroup comparison at different height from CEJ was done with ANOVAfollowed by Tukey's post-hoc test to see the difference within the category.
Result: There was a statistically significant difference observed in the inter-radicular distance between the maxillary first and second premolars at a height of 6 mm between Class I and Class II malocclusion patterns (p = 0.03). There were differences observed in the inter-radicular distance of the mandible at a different height based on skeletal malocclusion pattern, which was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The buccal cortical bone thickness between the maxillary central and lateral incisors at the height of 2 mm from CEJ between Class I and Class II skeletal malocclusion patterns was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The buccal cortical bone thickness of the mandible at different heights based on skeletal malocclusion pattern there were differences observed which were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The inter-radicular distance and buccal cortical bone thickness could be influenced by different skeletal patterns and tend to increase from the CEJ to the apex in both Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.