The Psychic Medium: A Feminism for Media Theory, in the Post?

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
K. Atkin
{"title":"The Psychic Medium: A Feminism for Media Theory, in the Post?","authors":"K. Atkin","doi":"10.1353/dia.2021.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This short article considers an etymological observation that the word medium takes on two seemingly distinct, or even paradoxical, new meanings in the middle of the nineteenth century: first, in 1850, the word medium is used to discuss mass media as a form of increasingly decentralized technological syndication capable of great influence and power; second, in 1851, the word medium is used to describe a person with psychic or clairvoyant capacities—a spiritual medium. Following Jill Galvan’s argument that modern concepts of media are closely tied to gender difference, I argue that the feminine trope of the spiritual medium is siphoned off from rationalist discourses of modern mass media to mitigate its dangerous potential. The result is both a cultural and academic understanding of the object of media studies that is incompatible with a project like women in theory for both structural and epistemological reasons. An early twentieth century novel, Harriet Hume, by Rebecca West, models anti-subjective, non-representational practices of media in the form of telepathy and allows us to approach this fissure. By following the lines of intersection between mass media and spiritual media, by imagining they are more similar than different, this article opens up new lines of inquiry for understanding the real and potential contribution of women to media theory emerging in the nineteenth century, the production of women as theoretical media constructs, and speculations on the theoretical and material emplacement of women in the academic practice of media theory today.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":"49 1","pages":"101 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2021.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This short article considers an etymological observation that the word medium takes on two seemingly distinct, or even paradoxical, new meanings in the middle of the nineteenth century: first, in 1850, the word medium is used to discuss mass media as a form of increasingly decentralized technological syndication capable of great influence and power; second, in 1851, the word medium is used to describe a person with psychic or clairvoyant capacities—a spiritual medium. Following Jill Galvan’s argument that modern concepts of media are closely tied to gender difference, I argue that the feminine trope of the spiritual medium is siphoned off from rationalist discourses of modern mass media to mitigate its dangerous potential. The result is both a cultural and academic understanding of the object of media studies that is incompatible with a project like women in theory for both structural and epistemological reasons. An early twentieth century novel, Harriet Hume, by Rebecca West, models anti-subjective, non-representational practices of media in the form of telepathy and allows us to approach this fissure. By following the lines of intersection between mass media and spiritual media, by imagining they are more similar than different, this article opens up new lines of inquiry for understanding the real and potential contribution of women to media theory emerging in the nineteenth century, the production of women as theoretical media constructs, and speculations on the theoretical and material emplacement of women in the academic practice of media theory today.
心灵媒介:媒体理论中的女性主义?
摘要:这篇短文考虑了一个词源学观察,即媒体一词在19世纪中期呈现出两种看似不同甚至自相矛盾的新含义:首先,1850年,媒体一词被用来讨论大众媒体,认为它是一种越来越分散的技术联合形式,能够产生巨大的影响力和权力;其次,在1851年,媒介这个词被用来形容一个有通灵能力或洞察力的人——一种精神媒介。继吉尔·加尔文(Jill Galvan)认为现代媒体概念与性别差异密切相关之后,我认为精神媒体的女性比喻是从现代大众媒体的理性主义话语中抽走的,以减轻其危险的潜力。其结果是对媒体研究对象的文化和学术理解,由于结构和认识论的原因,在理论上与女性这样的项目不兼容。丽贝卡·韦斯特(Rebecca West)的二十世纪早期小说《哈里特·休谟》(Harriet Hume)以心灵感应的形式模拟了媒体的反主观、非代表性实践,并使我们能够接近这种裂痕。通过遵循大众媒体和精神媒体之间的交叉线,想象它们更相似而不是不同,本文为理解女性对19世纪出现的媒体理论的真实和潜在贡献,女性作为理论媒体建构的生产,以及对女性在当今媒介理论学术实践中的理论与物质定位的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信