Laterization Process Recognition along the Northern Border of the Congo Craton by Geoelectrical and Geotechnical Data

IF 1 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
H. E. Nkoungou, S. Tsala, V. Oyoa, P. Eba'a Owoutou
{"title":"Laterization Process Recognition along the Northern Border of the Congo Craton by Geoelectrical and Geotechnical Data","authors":"H. E. Nkoungou, S. Tsala, V. Oyoa, P. Eba'a Owoutou","doi":"10.1155/2023/8534774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the properties of laterites being related to the nature of the rock from which they are derived, twenty vertical electrical surveys and twenty boreholes for geotechnical tests, distributed in two units (plutonic and green belt zones) of the Ntem complex located at the northern limit of the Congo Craton, were implemented to study the formation process of the laterites of this geological structure. The inversion of the geoelectrical data in the plutonic area resulted in three lateritic layers with resistivities of 1090 Ω·m, 1302 Ω·m, and 1122 Ω·m, with induration and leaching indices of 28.9% and 72.56%. In the green belt zone, three lateritic layers were also identified with resistivities of 1080 Ω·m, 943 Ω·m, and 1158 Ω·m, with induration and leaching indices of 28.8% and 72.55%. The similarities of the geomechanical parameters (induration and lixiviation indices) show that these soils experienced similar weathering patterns during the same geological period, confirmed by CBR values, corresponding to PF3 platforms that can be used in road works. However, the average resistivity values in the different geological units (1171.77 Ω·m and 1061.16 Ω·m in plutonic and green belt areas) reflect the observed differences in resistivity values of the bedrock alterations (3413.51 Ω·m and 1569.32 Ω·m in plutonic and green belt areas), showing that these laterites are derived from different bedrock weathering. In addition, the average permeability values obtained in the plutonic zone (\n \n k\n =\n 6.24\n E\n −\n 05\n \n  cm/s) and in the green belt zone (\n \n k\n =\n 5.82\n E\n −\n 05\n \n  cm/s) confirm this difference. The reduction in the difference between the resistivities of the laterites compared to the difference observed in the bedrock of the two units highlights the leaching process over a long geological period.","PeriodicalId":45602,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8534774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the properties of laterites being related to the nature of the rock from which they are derived, twenty vertical electrical surveys and twenty boreholes for geotechnical tests, distributed in two units (plutonic and green belt zones) of the Ntem complex located at the northern limit of the Congo Craton, were implemented to study the formation process of the laterites of this geological structure. The inversion of the geoelectrical data in the plutonic area resulted in three lateritic layers with resistivities of 1090 Ω·m, 1302 Ω·m, and 1122 Ω·m, with induration and leaching indices of 28.9% and 72.56%. In the green belt zone, three lateritic layers were also identified with resistivities of 1080 Ω·m, 943 Ω·m, and 1158 Ω·m, with induration and leaching indices of 28.8% and 72.55%. The similarities of the geomechanical parameters (induration and lixiviation indices) show that these soils experienced similar weathering patterns during the same geological period, confirmed by CBR values, corresponding to PF3 platforms that can be used in road works. However, the average resistivity values in the different geological units (1171.77 Ω·m and 1061.16 Ω·m in plutonic and green belt areas) reflect the observed differences in resistivity values of the bedrock alterations (3413.51 Ω·m and 1569.32 Ω·m in plutonic and green belt areas), showing that these laterites are derived from different bedrock weathering. In addition, the average permeability values obtained in the plutonic zone ( k = 6.24 E − 05  cm/s) and in the green belt zone ( k = 5.82 E − 05  cm/s) confirm this difference. The reduction in the difference between the resistivities of the laterites compared to the difference observed in the bedrock of the two units highlights the leaching process over a long geological period.
利用地电学和岩土工程资料识别刚果克拉通北部边界的偏侧化过程
由于红土的性质与其所产岩石的性质有关,在位于刚果克拉通北部边界的Ntem杂岩的两个单元(深成带和绿带)进行了20个垂直电测量和20个钻孔岩土工程试验,研究了该地质构造红土的形成过程。对深成矿区地电资料进行反演,得到3层红土层,电阻率分别为1090 Ω·m、1302 Ω·m和1122 Ω·m,硬化指数和浸出指数分别为28.9%和72.56%。绿带区还鉴定出3个红土层,电阻率分别为1080 Ω·m、943 Ω·m和1158 Ω·m,硬化指数和浸出指数分别为28.8%和72.55%。地质力学参数(硬化指数和浸出指数)的相似性表明,这些土壤在同一地质时期经历了相似的风化模式,CBR值证实了这一点,对应于可用于道路工程的PF3平台。然而,不同地质单元的平均电阻率值(深裂带和绿带分别为1171.77 Ω·m和1061.16 Ω·m)反映了基岩蚀变的电阻率值(深裂带和绿带分别为3413.51 Ω·m和1569.32 Ω·m)的差异,表明这些红土是由不同的基岩风化作用形成的。此外,深成带(k = 6.24 E−05 cm/s)和绿带(k = 5.82 E−05 cm/s)的平均渗透率值也证实了这一差异。与两个单元基岩中观察到的电阻率差异相比,红土电阻率差异的减小突出了长期地质时期的浸出过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Geophysics
International Journal of Geophysics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Geophysics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of theoretical, observational, applied, and computational geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信