Pancreatico-jejunostomy versus pancreatico-gasrostomy after pancreatico-duodenectomy in decreasing postoperative pancreatic fistula

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
Sayed Shaker Shaeir, M. A. ElKordy, M. E. Sobeih, R. Allam, Ayman Hanafy
{"title":"Pancreatico-jejunostomy versus pancreatico-gasrostomy after pancreatico-duodenectomy in decreasing postoperative pancreatic fistula","authors":"Sayed Shaker Shaeir, M. A. ElKordy, M. E. Sobeih, R. Allam, Ayman Hanafy","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_91_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Pancreatico-duodenectomy is still the cornerstone in curating pancreatic and periampullary cancers. Many techniques for pancreatic anastomosis were described. Pancreatico-gastrostomy (PG) may be a suitable technique, especially in small pancreatic ducts where the stitching of duct to mucosa may be difficult. Still, the results of pancreatico-gastrostomy compared to pancreatico-jejunostomy (PJ) in terms of morbidity are not well studied; hence, this study was designed to investigate. Objective To compare pancreatico-gastrostomy versus pancreatico-jejunostomy post pancreatico-duodenectomy from points of operative techniques and characteristics, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Patients and methods The Cohort study included all cases diagnosed with either pancreatic head or periampullary cancers and underwent pancreatico-duodenectomy at National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, between January 2021 and February 2023. Cases were enrolled into one of the two groups, group 1: underwent pancreatico-gastrostomy, while group 2 underwent pancreatico-jejunostomy. The two groups were compared by: Demographic characteristics, preoperative investigations results, operative, postoperative data and histopathological results of the specimens resected. Results Incidence of the pancreatic leak was not significantly different in both groups (17.6% versus 15.8% for PG and PJ respectively, P=0.833), operative time was shorter in a pancreatico-gastrostomy group (310, 355 min, P=0.001), Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was less occurred in cases of pancreatico-gastrostomy (5.9%, 31.6%, P=0.006). Postoperative mortality was not different in both groups (8.8%, 2.6% for PG and PJ respectively, P=0.338). Conclusion Regarding the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, both reconstruction methods produce comparable postoperative results. Pancreatico-gastrostomy is a good alternative technique to the standard pancreatico-jejunostomy.","PeriodicalId":43393,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":"473 - 481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_91_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Pancreatico-duodenectomy is still the cornerstone in curating pancreatic and periampullary cancers. Many techniques for pancreatic anastomosis were described. Pancreatico-gastrostomy (PG) may be a suitable technique, especially in small pancreatic ducts where the stitching of duct to mucosa may be difficult. Still, the results of pancreatico-gastrostomy compared to pancreatico-jejunostomy (PJ) in terms of morbidity are not well studied; hence, this study was designed to investigate. Objective To compare pancreatico-gastrostomy versus pancreatico-jejunostomy post pancreatico-duodenectomy from points of operative techniques and characteristics, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Patients and methods The Cohort study included all cases diagnosed with either pancreatic head or periampullary cancers and underwent pancreatico-duodenectomy at National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, between January 2021 and February 2023. Cases were enrolled into one of the two groups, group 1: underwent pancreatico-gastrostomy, while group 2 underwent pancreatico-jejunostomy. The two groups were compared by: Demographic characteristics, preoperative investigations results, operative, postoperative data and histopathological results of the specimens resected. Results Incidence of the pancreatic leak was not significantly different in both groups (17.6% versus 15.8% for PG and PJ respectively, P=0.833), operative time was shorter in a pancreatico-gastrostomy group (310, 355 min, P=0.001), Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was less occurred in cases of pancreatico-gastrostomy (5.9%, 31.6%, P=0.006). Postoperative mortality was not different in both groups (8.8%, 2.6% for PG and PJ respectively, P=0.338). Conclusion Regarding the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, both reconstruction methods produce comparable postoperative results. Pancreatico-gastrostomy is a good alternative technique to the standard pancreatico-jejunostomy.
胰十二指肠切除术后胰肠造口术与胰胃造口术减少胰瘘的比较
背景胰十二指肠切除术仍然是治疗胰腺和壶腹周围癌的基石。介绍了多种胰吻合技术。胰胃造口术(PG)可能是一种合适的技术,特别是在细小的胰管中,胰管与粘膜的缝合可能很困难。尽管如此,胰胃吻合术与胰空肠吻合术(PJ)在发病率方面的结果尚未得到很好的研究;因此,本研究旨在调查。目的比较胰十二指肠切除术后胰胃吻合术与胰空肠吻合术的手术技术、特点及术后发病率和死亡率。患者和方法队列研究包括2021年1月至2023年2月期间在开罗大学国家癌症研究所(NCI)诊断为胰腺头癌或壶腹周围癌并接受胰十二指肠切除术的所有病例。患者分为两组,1组行胰胃造口术,2组行胰空肠造口术。比较两组患者的人口学特征、术前调查结果、手术、术后资料及切除标本的组织病理学结果。结果两组胰腺漏发生率无统计学差异(PG组17.6%,PJ组15.8%,P=0.833),胰胃造瘘组手术时间更短(310分钟,355分钟,P=0.001),胰胃造瘘组胃排空延迟(DGE)发生率更低(5.9%,31.6%,P=0.006)。两组术后死亡率无差异(PG组为8.8%,PJ组为2.6%,P=0.338)。结论关于术后胰瘘的发生率,两种重建方法的术后效果相当。胰胃吻合术是标准胰空肠吻合术的一种很好的替代技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信