The Global North/South Inequalities in the IR Discipline: Some Reflections and Insights

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Alternatives Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1177/03043754221095304

L. I. Oztig

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Global South scholars have a lot to offer to the IR discipline in terms of new ways of producing knowledge. However, there is a huge difference between the Global North and the Global South in terms of knowledge production in the discipline. The US and Western Europe take the lead in IR research. There is also a vast inequality within the Global South. Some Global South regions are more integrated with the global IR community and more visible in IR journals, while other regions are almost invisible. This commentary provides a glimpse into the dynamics of knowledge production and discusses the ways in which the Global South could be more integrated to the global IR community.

查看原文本刊更多论文

国际关系学科中的全球南北不平等:一些反思和见解

全球南方国家的学者可以为国际关系学科提供很多产生知识的新途径。然而，全球北方和全球南方在该学科的知识生产方面存在巨大差异。美国和西欧在IR研究方面处于领先地位。全球南方国家内部也存在着巨大的不平等。全球南方的一些地区与全球国际关系社区的整合程度更高，在国际关系期刊上的能见度更高，而其他地区几乎不可见。本评论提供了对知识生产动态的一瞥，并讨论了如何使全球南方国家更融入全球国际关系社区。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Alternatives INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： A peer-reviewed journal, Alternatives explores the possibilities of new forms of political practice and identity under increasingly global conditions. Specifically, the editors focus on the changing relationships between local political practices and identities and emerging forms of global economy, culture, and polity. Published in association with the Center for the Study of Developing Societies (India).