“It’s Just a Never-Ending Battle”: The Role of Modern Hygiene Ideals and the Dynamics of Everyday Life in Constructing Indoor Ecologies

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Rachael Wakefield-Rann, Dena Fam, Susan Stewart
{"title":"“It’s Just a Never-Ending Battle”: The Role of Modern Hygiene Ideals and the Dynamics of Everyday Life in Constructing Indoor Ecologies","authors":"Rachael Wakefield-Rann, Dena Fam, Susan Stewart","doi":"10.22459/HER.24.02.2018.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research suggests that the greatest threat to children’s health from home environments across much of the industrialized world may no longer be pathogenic microbes, but impoverished microbial communities and the chemicals used in everyday products, including those for cleaning. This paper proposes that concepts of hygiene should be updated, given this reorientation of harm. However, little research has been conducted, which a) integrates knowledge from the diverse disciplinary fields concerned with indoor environments (such as microbiology, chemistry, and design), and b) examines how individuals conceptualize and enact hygiene to create healthier indoor environments for their families, including the extent to which their practices achieve this. To gain insight into factors influencing how hygiene is enacted in the home, as well as the consequent effects on the composition of indoor environments, it is necessary to transgress traditional disciplinary approaches to investigate indoor environmental health and integrate knowledge from experts and lay people who inhabit these spaces. To do this, recent scientific and design literature addressing key determinants of environmental health in homes are consulted. This is combined with qualitative research into the ways in which parents define, perform, and measure hygiene 1 Corresponding author: rachael.wakefield-rann@uts.edu.au. Human Ecology Review, Volume 24, Number 2, 2018 62 within domestic spaces. The data collected concerns homes in Sydney, Australia, with the findings showing that common hygiene practices with potentially harmful outcomes often emerge from compromises between competing priorities within complexes of home practices. Factors influencing the dynamics that determine which activities are prioritized and how they are performed are dually highlighted. Some notable factors include confusion and uncertainty associated with the sensory proxies used to determine cleanliness and risk of harm, increased sensitivity to the potential presence of microbes over other potentially harmful microspecies, and the health histories and experiences of parents and children.","PeriodicalId":46896,"journal":{"name":"Human Ecology Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Ecology Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.24.02.2018.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent research suggests that the greatest threat to children’s health from home environments across much of the industrialized world may no longer be pathogenic microbes, but impoverished microbial communities and the chemicals used in everyday products, including those for cleaning. This paper proposes that concepts of hygiene should be updated, given this reorientation of harm. However, little research has been conducted, which a) integrates knowledge from the diverse disciplinary fields concerned with indoor environments (such as microbiology, chemistry, and design), and b) examines how individuals conceptualize and enact hygiene to create healthier indoor environments for their families, including the extent to which their practices achieve this. To gain insight into factors influencing how hygiene is enacted in the home, as well as the consequent effects on the composition of indoor environments, it is necessary to transgress traditional disciplinary approaches to investigate indoor environmental health and integrate knowledge from experts and lay people who inhabit these spaces. To do this, recent scientific and design literature addressing key determinants of environmental health in homes are consulted. This is combined with qualitative research into the ways in which parents define, perform, and measure hygiene 1 Corresponding author: rachael.wakefield-rann@uts.edu.au. Human Ecology Review, Volume 24, Number 2, 2018 62 within domestic spaces. The data collected concerns homes in Sydney, Australia, with the findings showing that common hygiene practices with potentially harmful outcomes often emerge from compromises between competing priorities within complexes of home practices. Factors influencing the dynamics that determine which activities are prioritized and how they are performed are dually highlighted. Some notable factors include confusion and uncertainty associated with the sensory proxies used to determine cleanliness and risk of harm, increased sensitivity to the potential presence of microbes over other potentially harmful microspecies, and the health histories and experiences of parents and children.
“这只是一场永无止境的战斗”:现代卫生理想和日常生活动态在室内生态建设中的作用
最近的研究表明,在大部分工业化国家,家庭环境对儿童健康的最大威胁可能不再是致病微生物,而是贫穷的微生物群落和日常产品中使用的化学物质,包括清洁产品。鉴于这种对危害的重新定位,本文提出卫生概念应该更新。然而,很少进行研究,a)整合了与室内环境有关的不同学科领域的知识(如微生物学、化学和设计),b)研究了个人如何概念化和实施卫生,为家人创造更健康的室内环境,包括他们的实践在多大程度上实现了这一点。为了深入了解影响家庭卫生的因素,以及由此对室内环境组成的影响,有必要打破传统的学科方法来调查室内环境健康,并整合居住在这些空间的专家和非专业人士的知识。为此,查阅了最近关于家庭环境健康关键决定因素的科学和设计文献。这与对父母定义、执行和测量卫生的方式的定性研究相结合1通讯作者:rachael.wakefield-rann@uts.edu.au.《人类生态学评论》,第24卷,2018年第2期,62国内空间。收集的数据涉及澳大利亚悉尼的家庭,研究结果表明,具有潜在有害后果的常见卫生习惯往往是由于家庭习惯复合体中相互竞争的优先事项之间的妥协而产生的。影响决定哪些活动被优先考虑以及如何执行的动态的因素被双重强调。一些值得注意的因素包括与用于确定清洁度和危害风险的感官指标相关的困惑和不确定性,对微生物潜在存在的敏感性高于其他潜在有害的微观物种,以及父母和儿童的健康史和经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Human Ecology Review (ISSN 1074-4827) is a refereed journal published twice a year by the Society for Human Ecology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed research and theory on the interaction between humans and the environment and other links between culture and nature (Research in Human Ecology), essays and applications relevant to human ecology (Human Ecology Forum), book reviews (Contemporary Human Ecology), and relevant commentary, announcements, and awards (Human Ecology Bulletin).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信