A Novel Technique of Biological Osteosynthesis in a Bicondylar Tibial Fracture

Y. Salphale, N. Kimmatkar, Vikrant Salphale, W. Gadegone, R. Mohapatra, Anuradha Y. Salphale, Jenny Garg, Ketaki Mohite
{"title":"A Novel Technique of Biological Osteosynthesis in a Bicondylar Tibial Fracture","authors":"Y. Salphale, N. Kimmatkar, Vikrant Salphale, W. Gadegone, R. Mohapatra, Anuradha Y. Salphale, Jenny Garg, Ketaki Mohite","doi":"10.52916/jmrs224067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the biological treatment outcomes for tibial plateau fractures. Methods: 8 men and 4 women aged 21 to 54 (mean, 36) years with closed tibial plateau fractures were enrolled for the study. According to the Schatzker classification, patients were classified into type I (n=1), type II (n=2), type IV (n=4), and type V (n=5). After closed reduction the fracture was fixed with two to three 6.5 mm cannulated cancellous screws and crossed K wires.The functional outcome was evaluated using the Rasmussen score. A total score of 28 to 36 was considered as excellent, 20 to 27 as good, and less than 10 as poor. Results: Patients were followed up for a mean of 2.2 (range, 1-3.4) years. All the fracture united radiographically after a mean of 3 (range, 2.3-4.3) months. Respectively in Schatzker types-I, II, IV, and V fractures, outcomes were excellent in 1, 2, 3, and 3 patients, It was good in 0, 0, 1, and 1 patients, fair in 0, 0, 0, and 1 patient, and poor in 0, 0, 0, and 0 patients. Outcome was satisfactory (good-to-excellent) in 85%, 86%, 100%, and 80% of the respective fracture types of patients. The mean Rasmussen score was 26.7 for all patients; it was 27.7 for type I, 26.5 for type II, 28.9 for type IV, and 24.4 for type V fractures. No infection, wound dehiscence or hardware issues were noted. Conclusion: This technique offers improved fracture healing without any risk of soft tissue complications, minimising the hospital stay and expenditure.","PeriodicalId":73820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical research and surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical research and surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52916/jmrs224067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the biological treatment outcomes for tibial plateau fractures. Methods: 8 men and 4 women aged 21 to 54 (mean, 36) years with closed tibial plateau fractures were enrolled for the study. According to the Schatzker classification, patients were classified into type I (n=1), type II (n=2), type IV (n=4), and type V (n=5). After closed reduction the fracture was fixed with two to three 6.5 mm cannulated cancellous screws and crossed K wires.The functional outcome was evaluated using the Rasmussen score. A total score of 28 to 36 was considered as excellent, 20 to 27 as good, and less than 10 as poor. Results: Patients were followed up for a mean of 2.2 (range, 1-3.4) years. All the fracture united radiographically after a mean of 3 (range, 2.3-4.3) months. Respectively in Schatzker types-I, II, IV, and V fractures, outcomes were excellent in 1, 2, 3, and 3 patients, It was good in 0, 0, 1, and 1 patients, fair in 0, 0, 0, and 1 patient, and poor in 0, 0, 0, and 0 patients. Outcome was satisfactory (good-to-excellent) in 85%, 86%, 100%, and 80% of the respective fracture types of patients. The mean Rasmussen score was 26.7 for all patients; it was 27.7 for type I, 26.5 for type II, 28.9 for type IV, and 24.4 for type V fractures. No infection, wound dehiscence or hardware issues were noted. Conclusion: This technique offers improved fracture healing without any risk of soft tissue complications, minimising the hospital stay and expenditure.
生物成骨新技术治疗胫骨双髁骨折
目的:评价胫骨平台骨折的生物治疗效果。方法:男性8例,女性4例,年龄21 ~ 54岁,平均36岁,胫骨平台闭合性骨折。根据Schatzker分型将患者分为I型(n=1)、II型(n=2)、IV型(n=4)和V型(n=5)。闭合复位后用2 - 3枚6.5 mm空心松质螺钉和交叉K针固定骨折。功能结果采用Rasmussen评分进行评估。总分28 ~ 36分为优秀,20 ~ 27分为好,10分以下为差。结果:患者平均随访2.2年(范围1-3.4年)。所有骨折均在平均3个月(范围2.3-4.3个月)后影像学愈合。在Schatzker型- i、II、IV和V型骨折中,分别有1、2、3和3例患者预后良好,0、0、1和1例患者预后良好,0、0、0和1例患者预后一般,0、0、0和0例患者预后较差。85%、86%、100%和80%的骨折类型患者的结果满意(良至优)。所有患者的平均拉斯穆森评分为26.7;I型为27.7分,II型为26.5分,IV型为28.9分,V型为24.4分。无感染、创面裂开或硬体问题。结论:该技术改善了骨折愈合,没有任何软组织并发症的风险,最大限度地减少了住院时间和费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信