The Evolution of Brazilian CFIAs from 2015 to 2020: Like Wine, Does It Get Better with Time?

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Samy Rais, K. Duggal
{"title":"The Evolution of Brazilian CFIAs from 2015 to 2020: Like Wine, Does It Get Better with Time?","authors":"Samy Rais, K. Duggal","doi":"10.54648/joia2021012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article undertakes an in-depth analysis of the evolution of Brazil’s Cooperation and Facilitation Investment Agreements (CFIAs) since the publication of the Brazilian Model CFIA in 2015. It studies the tumultuous history of investment treaties in Brazil and how it may have shaped Brazil’s response to the investor-State arbitration regime through the current model CFIA. It assesses how the reception of Brazil’s Model CFIA among Brazilian stakeholders and commentators may have influenced the trends and evolutions of the fourteen CFIAs signed by Brazil from 2015 to 2020. It argues that the Brazilian CFIAs have improved with time through the progressive narrowing and strengthening of their jurisdictional, substantial, public policy and dispute resolution clauses. At the same time, they may not have fully implemented the criticisms and comments of academia and Brazilian civil society, and some provisions remain to be clarified in the future.\nBilateral Investment Agreement, Brazil, Model BIT, Cooperation and Facilitation Investment Agreements, Investment arbitration reform","PeriodicalId":43527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Arbitration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2021012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article undertakes an in-depth analysis of the evolution of Brazil’s Cooperation and Facilitation Investment Agreements (CFIAs) since the publication of the Brazilian Model CFIA in 2015. It studies the tumultuous history of investment treaties in Brazil and how it may have shaped Brazil’s response to the investor-State arbitration regime through the current model CFIA. It assesses how the reception of Brazil’s Model CFIA among Brazilian stakeholders and commentators may have influenced the trends and evolutions of the fourteen CFIAs signed by Brazil from 2015 to 2020. It argues that the Brazilian CFIAs have improved with time through the progressive narrowing and strengthening of their jurisdictional, substantial, public policy and dispute resolution clauses. At the same time, they may not have fully implemented the criticisms and comments of academia and Brazilian civil society, and some provisions remain to be clarified in the future. Bilateral Investment Agreement, Brazil, Model BIT, Cooperation and Facilitation Investment Agreements, Investment arbitration reform
2015 - 2020年巴西CFIAs的演变:与葡萄酒一样,是否会随着时间的推移而变得更好?
本文深入分析了自2015年《巴西合作与便利投资协定范本》发布以来,巴西合作与促进投资协定的演变。它研究了巴西投资条约的动荡历史,以及它如何通过当前的外国投资委员会模式影响了巴西对投资者-国家仲裁制度的反应。它评估了巴西利益相关者和评论员对巴西示范外国投资协定的接受程度如何影响巴西在2015年至2020年签署的14个外国投资协定中的趋势和演变。它认为,随着时间的推移,巴西外国投资委员会通过逐步缩小和加强其管辖权、实质性、公共政策和争端解决条款而有所改进。同时,他们可能还没有完全落实学术界和巴西民间社会的批评和评论,一些条款还有待日后澄清。双边投资协定、巴西、双边投资协定范本、合作与便利化投资协定、投资仲裁改革
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Since its 1984 launch, the Journal of International Arbitration has established itself as a thought provoking, ground breaking journal aimed at the specific requirements of those involved in international arbitration. Each issue contains in depth investigations of the most important current issues in international arbitration, focusing on business, investment, and economic disputes between private corporations, State controlled entities, and States. The new Notes and Current Developments sections contain concise and critical commentary on new developments. The journal’s worldwide coverage and bimonthly circulation give it even more immediacy as a forum for original thinking, penetrating analysis and lively discussion of international arbitration issues from around the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信