Transparency in internet regulation and governance: arguments and counter-arguments with some methodological reflections

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Gianluca Andresani, Natalina Stamile
{"title":"Transparency in internet regulation and governance: arguments and counter-arguments with some methodological reflections","authors":"Gianluca Andresani, Natalina Stamile","doi":"10.9732/RBEP.V117I0.624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate on the argumentative turn in Public Policy and Administration (PPA), as reflective of the influence of political-legal theory on the discipline, is reviewed with a thorough and indepth engagement with the Argumentation Theory (AT) literature. The focus in this article is in fact of a methodological nature, since we argue that critical scholars - who have contributed to the general and specialized (i.e. political discourse analysis and critical contextualism) literature of AT as well as politico-legal theory - pave  way to a novel methodology which will be exemplifed through the analysis of the transparency concept.","PeriodicalId":53782,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9732/RBEP.V117I0.624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The debate on the argumentative turn in Public Policy and Administration (PPA), as reflective of the influence of political-legal theory on the discipline, is reviewed with a thorough and indepth engagement with the Argumentation Theory (AT) literature. The focus in this article is in fact of a methodological nature, since we argue that critical scholars - who have contributed to the general and specialized (i.e. political discourse analysis and critical contextualism) literature of AT as well as politico-legal theory - pave  way to a novel methodology which will be exemplifed through the analysis of the transparency concept.
互联网监管和治理的透明度:带有一些方法论反思的论证与反论证
关于公共政策与行政(PPA)中的论辩转向的辩论,反映了政治-法律理论对该学科的影响,通过与论辩理论(AT)文献的全面和深入的接触进行了回顾。这篇文章的重点实际上是方法论的本质,因为我们认为,批判性学者——他们对法律研究的一般和专门文献(即政治话语分析和批判性语境主义)以及政治法律理论做出了贡献——为一种新的方法论铺平了道路,这种方法论将通过对透明度概念的分析来举例说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信