Concussion assessment potentially aided by use of an objective multimodal concussion index

A. Jacquin, J. Bazarian, D. Casa, R. Elbin, G. Hotz, David M Schnyer, S. Yeargin, L. Prichep, T. Covassin
{"title":"Concussion assessment potentially aided by use of an objective multimodal concussion index","authors":"A. Jacquin, J. Bazarian, D. Casa, R. Elbin, G. Hotz, David M Schnyer, S. Yeargin, L. Prichep, T. Covassin","doi":"10.1177/20597002211004333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Prompt, accurate, objective assessment of concussion is crucial as delays can lead to increased short and long-term consequences. The purpose of this study was to derive an objective multimodal concussion index (CI) using EEG at its core, to identify concussion, and to assess change over time throughout recovery. Methods Male and female concussed (N = 232) and control (N = 206) subjects 13–25 years were enrolled at 12 US colleges and high schools. Evaluations occurred within 72 h of injury, 5 days post-injury, at return-to-play (RTP), 45 days after RTP (RTP + 45); and included EEG, neurocognitive performance, and standard concussion assessments. Concussed subjects had a witnessed head impact, were removed from play for ≥ 5 days using site guidelines, and were divided into those with RTP < 14 or ≥14 days. Part 1 describes the derivation and efficacy of the machine learning derived classifier as a marker of concussion. Part 2 describes significance of differences in CI between groups at each time point and within each group across time points. Results Sensitivity = 84.9%, specificity = 76.0%, and AUC = 0.89 were obtained on a test Hold-Out group representing 20% of the total dataset. EEG features reflecting connectivity between brain regions contributed most to the CI. CI was stable over time in controls. Significant differences in CI between controls and concussed subjects were found at time of injury, with no significant differences at RTP and RTP + 45. Within the concussed, differences in rate of recovery were seen. Conclusions The CI was shown to have high accuracy as a marker of likelihood of concussion. Stability of CI in controls supports reliable interpretation of CI change in concussed subjects. Objective identification of the presence of concussion and assessment of readiness to return to normal activity can be aided by use of the CI, a rapidly obtained, point of care assessment tool.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20597002211004333","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002211004333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective Prompt, accurate, objective assessment of concussion is crucial as delays can lead to increased short and long-term consequences. The purpose of this study was to derive an objective multimodal concussion index (CI) using EEG at its core, to identify concussion, and to assess change over time throughout recovery. Methods Male and female concussed (N = 232) and control (N = 206) subjects 13–25 years were enrolled at 12 US colleges and high schools. Evaluations occurred within 72 h of injury, 5 days post-injury, at return-to-play (RTP), 45 days after RTP (RTP + 45); and included EEG, neurocognitive performance, and standard concussion assessments. Concussed subjects had a witnessed head impact, were removed from play for ≥ 5 days using site guidelines, and were divided into those with RTP < 14 or ≥14 days. Part 1 describes the derivation and efficacy of the machine learning derived classifier as a marker of concussion. Part 2 describes significance of differences in CI between groups at each time point and within each group across time points. Results Sensitivity = 84.9%, specificity = 76.0%, and AUC = 0.89 were obtained on a test Hold-Out group representing 20% of the total dataset. EEG features reflecting connectivity between brain regions contributed most to the CI. CI was stable over time in controls. Significant differences in CI between controls and concussed subjects were found at time of injury, with no significant differences at RTP and RTP + 45. Within the concussed, differences in rate of recovery were seen. Conclusions The CI was shown to have high accuracy as a marker of likelihood of concussion. Stability of CI in controls supports reliable interpretation of CI change in concussed subjects. Objective identification of the presence of concussion and assessment of readiness to return to normal activity can be aided by use of the CI, a rapidly obtained, point of care assessment tool.
使用客观的多模态脑震荡指数可能有助于脑震荡评估
及时、准确、客观地评估脑震荡是至关重要的,因为延误可能导致增加的短期和长期后果。本研究的目的是以脑电图为核心,得出客观的多模态脑震荡指数(CI),以识别脑震荡,并评估整个恢复过程中随时间的变化。方法选取美国12所大学和高中13-25岁的男女脑震荡患者(N = 232)和对照组(N = 206)。评估分别在受伤后72小时、受伤后5天、恢复比赛(RTP)时、恢复比赛后45天(RTP + 45)内进行;包括脑电图、神经认知表现和标准脑震荡评估。脑震荡受试者有头部撞击,根据现场指南退出比赛≥5天,并分为RTP < 14天和≥14天两组。第1部分描述了作为脑震荡标记的机器学习衍生分类器的推导和功效。第2部分描述了在每个时间点组之间以及在每个时间点组内CI差异的重要性。结果在占总数据集20%的test Hold-Out组中,灵敏度= 84.9%,特异性= 76.0%,AUC = 0.89。反映脑区间连通性的EEG特征对CI贡献最大。在对照组中,CI随着时间的推移是稳定的。在损伤时,对照组和脑震荡受试者之间的CI存在显著差异,而在RTP和RTP + 45时无显著差异。在脑震荡患者中,可以看到恢复率的差异。结论CI作为脑震荡可能性的标记物具有较高的准确性。对照组CI的稳定性支持对脑震荡受试者CI变化的可靠解释。使用CI(一种快速获得的护理点评估工具)可以帮助客观识别脑震荡的存在和评估是否准备好恢复正常活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信