{"title":"A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR OPTIMAL ORNSTEIN–UHLENBECK DRIVEN TRADING STRATEGIES","authors":"A. Lipton, M. L. Prado","doi":"10.1142/s0219024920500569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When prices reflect all available information, they oscillate around an equilibrium level. This oscillation is the result of the temporary market impact caused by waves of buyers and sellers. This price behavior can be approximated through an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) process. Market makers provide liquidity in an attempt to monetize this oscillation. They enter a long position when a security is priced below its estimated equilibrium level, and they enter a short position when a security is priced above its estimated equilibrium level. They hold that position until one of three outcomes occur: (1) they achieve the targeted profit; (2) they experience a maximum tolerated loss; (3) the position is held beyond a maximum tolerated horizon. All market makers are confronted with the problem of defining profit-taking and stop-out levels. More generally, all execution traders acting on behalf of a client must determine at what levels an order must be fulfilled. Those optimal levels can be determined by maximizing the trader’s Sharpe ratio in the context of OU processes via Monte Carlo experiments [M. López de Prado (2018) Advances in Financial Machine Learning. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons]. This paper develops an analytical framework and derives those optimal levels by using the method of heat potentials [A. Lipton & V. Kaushansky (2018) On the first hitting time density of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, arXiv:1810.02390; A. Lipton & V. Kaushansky (2020a) On the first hitting time density for a reducible diffusion process, Quantitative Finance, doi:10.1080/14697688.2020.1713394].","PeriodicalId":47022,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024920500569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
When prices reflect all available information, they oscillate around an equilibrium level. This oscillation is the result of the temporary market impact caused by waves of buyers and sellers. This price behavior can be approximated through an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) process. Market makers provide liquidity in an attempt to monetize this oscillation. They enter a long position when a security is priced below its estimated equilibrium level, and they enter a short position when a security is priced above its estimated equilibrium level. They hold that position until one of three outcomes occur: (1) they achieve the targeted profit; (2) they experience a maximum tolerated loss; (3) the position is held beyond a maximum tolerated horizon. All market makers are confronted with the problem of defining profit-taking and stop-out levels. More generally, all execution traders acting on behalf of a client must determine at what levels an order must be fulfilled. Those optimal levels can be determined by maximizing the trader’s Sharpe ratio in the context of OU processes via Monte Carlo experiments [M. López de Prado (2018) Advances in Financial Machine Learning. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons]. This paper develops an analytical framework and derives those optimal levels by using the method of heat potentials [A. Lipton & V. Kaushansky (2018) On the first hitting time density of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, arXiv:1810.02390; A. Lipton & V. Kaushansky (2020a) On the first hitting time density for a reducible diffusion process, Quantitative Finance, doi:10.1080/14697688.2020.1713394].
当价格反映了所有可用信息时,它们就会在均衡水平附近波动。这种波动是买方和卖方波动造成的暂时市场冲击的结果。这种价格行为可以通过Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU)过程来近似。做市商提供流动性,试图将这种波动货币化。当证券的价格低于其估计的均衡水平时,他们进入多头头寸,当证券的价格高于其估计的均衡水平时,他们进入空头头寸。他们持有该头寸,直到出现以下三种结果之一:(1)他们实现了目标利润;(二)遭受最大可容忍损失的;(3)持仓超过最大可容忍范围。所有做市商都面临着定义获利了结和止损水平的问题。更一般地说,所有代表客户的执行交易员都必须决定在什么水平上必须履行订单。这些最优水平可以通过蒙特卡洛实验在OU过程中最大化交易者的夏普比率来确定[M]。López de Prado(2018)金融机器学习的进展。霍博肯,新泽西州,美国:约翰威利和儿子]。本文建立了一个分析框架,并利用热势法推导出最佳水平[A]。Lipton & V. Kaushansky(2018)关于Ornstein-Uhlenbeck过程的首次撞击时间密度的研究,中国机械工程学报,34 (4):1810.02390;a . Lipton, V. Kaushansky . [2020a].可约扩散过程的第一次撞击时间密度,数理统计,doi:10.1080/14697688.2020.1713394]。
期刊介绍:
The shift of the financial market towards the general use of advanced mathematical methods has led to the introduction of state-of-the-art quantitative tools into the world of finance. The International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF) brings together international experts involved in the mathematical modelling of financial instruments as well as the application of these models to global financial markets. The development of complex financial products has led to new challenges to the regulatory bodies. Financial instruments that have been designed to serve the needs of the mature capitals market need to be adapted for application in the emerging markets.