Evaluation of Interobserver and Intraobserver Differences of Graf Method in Developmental Hip Dysplasia

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gelişimsel Kalça, Displazisinde Graf, Yönteminin Gözlemciler, Arası ve, Gözlemci İçi, Farklılıklarının Değerlendirilmesi, H. Doğruel, A. C. Baymurat, Ismail Cengiz Tuncay, Hakan Atalar
{"title":"Evaluation of Interobserver and Intraobserver Differences of Graf Method in Developmental Hip Dysplasia","authors":"Gelişimsel Kalça, Displazisinde Graf, Yönteminin Gözlemciler, Arası ve, Gözlemci İçi, Farklılıklarının Değerlendirilmesi, H. Doğruel, A. C. Baymurat, Ismail Cengiz Tuncay, Hakan Atalar","doi":"10.12996/gmj.2023.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hip ultrasonography (US) results between physicians working in different medical centers. Method: In this study, a total of 117 horizontal US images representing all sonographic types of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) were utilized. Four experienced researchers independently measured the 117 US images at different times. The results obtained by each researcher were documented separately, including alpha and beta angles, Graf types. All of the collected data were analyzed statistically to assess for interobserver and intraobserver variability. Results: The study found that the average change between the alpha angles ranged from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 4. The mean change between the beta angles was wider, ranging from a minimum of 1.8 to a maximum of 8.2. To evaluate the differences between the Graf hip typologies, paired groups were formed and Cohen's Kappa method was used. For the first group k= 0.661, for the second group k= 0.671, for the third group K= 0.647, for the fourth group k= 0, 718, k= 0.717 for the fifth group and k= 0.637 for the sixth group. Interobserver Kappa evaluation results (k=0.647) showed moderate and significant agreement. Conclusion: The results revealed a moderate to substantial level of agreement between the researchers. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the use of US for screening and follow-up of the Graf hip typing method should be performed by experienced professionals.","PeriodicalId":42791,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12996/gmj.2023.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hip ultrasonography (US) results between physicians working in different medical centers. Method: In this study, a total of 117 horizontal US images representing all sonographic types of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) were utilized. Four experienced researchers independently measured the 117 US images at different times. The results obtained by each researcher were documented separately, including alpha and beta angles, Graf types. All of the collected data were analyzed statistically to assess for interobserver and intraobserver variability. Results: The study found that the average change between the alpha angles ranged from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 4. The mean change between the beta angles was wider, ranging from a minimum of 1.8 to a maximum of 8.2. To evaluate the differences between the Graf hip typologies, paired groups were formed and Cohen's Kappa method was used. For the first group k= 0.661, for the second group k= 0.671, for the third group K= 0.647, for the fourth group k= 0, 718, k= 0.717 for the fifth group and k= 0.637 for the sixth group. Interobserver Kappa evaluation results (k=0.647) showed moderate and significant agreement. Conclusion: The results revealed a moderate to substantial level of agreement between the researchers. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the use of US for screening and follow-up of the Graf hip typing method should be performed by experienced professionals.
Graf方法在发育性髋关节发育不良中观察者间和观察者内差异的评价
目的:本研究的目的是评估在不同医疗中心工作的医生之间髋关节超声(US)结果的可能差异。方法:在本研究中,共使用了117张水平超声图像,代表了所有类型的髋关节发育不良(DDH)。四位经验丰富的研究人员在不同时间独立测量了117张美国图像。每个研究人员获得的结果都被单独记录下来,包括阿尔法角和贝塔角,Graf类型。对所有收集的数据进行统计学分析,以评估观察者间和观察者内的变异性。结果:研究发现,α角之间的平均变化范围从最小值1到最大值4。β角之间的平均变化范围更广,最小值为1.8,最大值为8.2。为了评估Graf-hip类型之间的差异,形成了配对组,并使用了Cohen的Kappa方法。对于第一组k=0.661,对于第二组k=0.671,对于第三组k=0.647,对于第四组k=0718,对于第五组k=0.717,对于第六组k=0.637。观察者间Kappa评价结果(k=0.647)显示中度和显著一致。结论:研究结果显示,研究人员之间存在中度到实质性的一致性。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,使用US筛查和随访Graf髋关节分型方法应由经验丰富的专业人员进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gazi Medical Journal
Gazi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Gazi Medical Journal is being published from 1990 four times annually. Gazi Medical Journal is an international journal presenting research results in all medical fields, with the aim of becoming the premier source of high quality research from Eastern Europe , Middle East and Asia. The Gazi Medical Journal is peer-reviewed and is published quarterly in paper and electronic version. The language of the Gazi Medical Journal is English and Turkish. Offerings include research articles, rapid communications, case reports, letters to the editor, meta-analyses and commentaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信