Gelişimsel Kalça, Displazisinde Graf, Yönteminin Gözlemciler, Arası ve, Gözlemci İçi, Farklılıklarının Değerlendirilmesi, H. Doğruel, A. C. Baymurat, Ismail Cengiz Tuncay, Hakan Atalar
{"title":"Evaluation of Interobserver and Intraobserver Differences of Graf Method in Developmental Hip Dysplasia","authors":"Gelişimsel Kalça, Displazisinde Graf, Yönteminin Gözlemciler, Arası ve, Gözlemci İçi, Farklılıklarının Değerlendirilmesi, H. Doğruel, A. C. Baymurat, Ismail Cengiz Tuncay, Hakan Atalar","doi":"10.12996/gmj.2023.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hip ultrasonography (US) results between physicians working in different medical centers. Method: In this study, a total of 117 horizontal US images representing all sonographic types of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) were utilized. Four experienced researchers independently measured the 117 US images at different times. The results obtained by each researcher were documented separately, including alpha and beta angles, Graf types. All of the collected data were analyzed statistically to assess for interobserver and intraobserver variability. Results: The study found that the average change between the alpha angles ranged from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 4. The mean change between the beta angles was wider, ranging from a minimum of 1.8 to a maximum of 8.2. To evaluate the differences between the Graf hip typologies, paired groups were formed and Cohen's Kappa method was used. For the first group k= 0.661, for the second group k= 0.671, for the third group K= 0.647, for the fourth group k= 0, 718, k= 0.717 for the fifth group and k= 0.637 for the sixth group. Interobserver Kappa evaluation results (k=0.647) showed moderate and significant agreement. Conclusion: The results revealed a moderate to substantial level of agreement between the researchers. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the use of US for screening and follow-up of the Graf hip typing method should be performed by experienced professionals.","PeriodicalId":42791,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12996/gmj.2023.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hip ultrasonography (US) results between physicians working in different medical centers. Method: In this study, a total of 117 horizontal US images representing all sonographic types of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) were utilized. Four experienced researchers independently measured the 117 US images at different times. The results obtained by each researcher were documented separately, including alpha and beta angles, Graf types. All of the collected data were analyzed statistically to assess for interobserver and intraobserver variability. Results: The study found that the average change between the alpha angles ranged from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 4. The mean change between the beta angles was wider, ranging from a minimum of 1.8 to a maximum of 8.2. To evaluate the differences between the Graf hip typologies, paired groups were formed and Cohen's Kappa method was used. For the first group k= 0.661, for the second group k= 0.671, for the third group K= 0.647, for the fourth group k= 0, 718, k= 0.717 for the fifth group and k= 0.637 for the sixth group. Interobserver Kappa evaluation results (k=0.647) showed moderate and significant agreement. Conclusion: The results revealed a moderate to substantial level of agreement between the researchers. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the use of US for screening and follow-up of the Graf hip typing method should be performed by experienced professionals.
期刊介绍:
Gazi Medical Journal is being published from 1990 four times annually. Gazi Medical Journal is an international journal presenting research results in all medical fields, with the aim of becoming the premier source of high quality research from Eastern Europe , Middle East and Asia. The Gazi Medical Journal is peer-reviewed and is published quarterly in paper and electronic version. The language of the Gazi Medical Journal is English and Turkish. Offerings include research articles, rapid communications, case reports, letters to the editor, meta-analyses and commentaries