Physical Restraint Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Intensive Care Nurses in Turkey: The Effectiveness of an In-Service Training Program

IF 0.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Selda Karaveli Çakır, E. Yilmaz, Işıl Işık Andsoy
{"title":"Physical Restraint Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Intensive Care Nurses in Turkey: The Effectiveness of an In-Service Training Program","authors":"Selda Karaveli Çakır, E. Yilmaz, Işıl Işık Andsoy","doi":"10.30621/jbachs.1085844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intensive care nurses use physical restraints (PRs) to prevent critically ill patients from disrupting invasive medical equipment, but they may not recognize the negative or positive consequences. \nPurpose: The study was conducted with a quasi-experimental, single-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the impact of PRs training on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of intensive care nurses. \nMaterials and Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 81 nurses. The data were obtained using a \" The Individual Data\" and the \"Levels of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Staff Regarding Physical Restraints Questionnaire.\" Descriptive statistics analyzed sample characteristics and Friedman's multiple comparison test performed to compare the effectiveness of training. \nResults: It was determined that all nurses applied physical restraint, and the rate of application of these on agitated and restless patients was 100%. Sixty-nine-point nine percent of the nurses decided on the physical restraint together with physicians, and 70.4% of them wanted to receive training about physical restraint. The nurses' attitude, and practice scores about the use of physical restraint in the post-intervention period and retest after 1 and 3 months increased significantly compared to the pre-intervention period (p=.000). \nConclusion: This study showed that the physical restraint training given to the nurses was effective. The findings recommended to carry out in-service training to increase the knowledge levels of nurses about physical restraint and its application, repeat this training periodically and evaluate its effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":40972,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1085844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care nurses use physical restraints (PRs) to prevent critically ill patients from disrupting invasive medical equipment, but they may not recognize the negative or positive consequences. Purpose: The study was conducted with a quasi-experimental, single-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the impact of PRs training on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of intensive care nurses. Materials and Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 81 nurses. The data were obtained using a " The Individual Data" and the "Levels of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Staff Regarding Physical Restraints Questionnaire." Descriptive statistics analyzed sample characteristics and Friedman's multiple comparison test performed to compare the effectiveness of training. Results: It was determined that all nurses applied physical restraint, and the rate of application of these on agitated and restless patients was 100%. Sixty-nine-point nine percent of the nurses decided on the physical restraint together with physicians, and 70.4% of them wanted to receive training about physical restraint. The nurses' attitude, and practice scores about the use of physical restraint in the post-intervention period and retest after 1 and 3 months increased significantly compared to the pre-intervention period (p=.000). Conclusion: This study showed that the physical restraint training given to the nurses was effective. The findings recommended to carry out in-service training to increase the knowledge levels of nurses about physical restraint and its application, repeat this training periodically and evaluate its effectiveness.
土耳其重症监护护士的身体约束知识、态度和实践:在职培训计划的有效性
背景:重症监护护士使用身体约束(PR)来防止危重患者干扰侵入性医疗设备,但他们可能没有意识到负面或积极的后果。目的:本研究采用准实验、单组前测后测设计进行,以评估PRs培训对重症监护护士知识、态度和实践的影响。材料和方法:本研究的样本由81名护士组成。这些数据是使用“个人数据”和“员工对身体约束的知识、态度和实践水平问卷”获得的。描述性统计分析了样本特征,并进行了弗里德曼多重比较测试,以比较培训的有效性。结果:确定所有护士都实施了身体约束,对烦躁不安的患者实施身体约束的比率为100%。69%的护士与医生一起决定进行身体约束,70.4%的护士希望接受有关身体约束的培训。与干预前相比,护士在干预后以及1个月和3个月后的复试中对使用身体约束的态度和实践得分显著提高(p=0.000)。结论:本研究表明,对护士进行的身体约束训练是有效的。研究结果建议进行在职培训,以提高护士对身体约束及其应用的知识水平,定期重复这种培训并评估其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信