Investigation of shear bond strength of different adhesive agents to demineralized enamel with or without resin ınfiltration

Rabia Bilgic, M. Yapar, Neslihan Celik, Nilgun Akgul
{"title":"Investigation of shear bond strength of different adhesive agents to demineralized enamel with or without resin ınfiltration","authors":"Rabia Bilgic, M. Yapar, Neslihan Celik, Nilgun Akgul","doi":"10.4103/jorr.jorr_78_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the bond strength of adhesive agents to enamel surfaces with and without resin infiltration. Materials and Methods: The crowns and roots of 198 human incisors were separated from each other and placed in an acrylic mold. The teeth were ground until the guide grooves created with the slotted bur disappeared. Then, it was thrown into the demineralization solution and artificial caries lesions were created. Teeth were randomly divided into two main groups, and each main group was divided into five subgroups. And also the control group was determined. The materials and composite were applied to demineralized enamel. For the shear bond analysis, a universal testing machine was used. Statistical analysis of the data was evaluated by one-way ANOVA test and independent t-test. Results: The result showed that there was no statistical difference between no resin infiltrant adhesive bonding agent groups (P < 0.05) and no difference between resin-treated groups and untreated groups of each bonding agent (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there is no difference between resin infiltrant pretreated adhesive bonding agent groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of different adhesive systems during restorative procedures after resin infiltration did not affect the shear bond strength.","PeriodicalId":31361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Research and Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"14 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jorr.jorr_78_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the bond strength of adhesive agents to enamel surfaces with and without resin infiltration. Materials and Methods: The crowns and roots of 198 human incisors were separated from each other and placed in an acrylic mold. The teeth were ground until the guide grooves created with the slotted bur disappeared. Then, it was thrown into the demineralization solution and artificial caries lesions were created. Teeth were randomly divided into two main groups, and each main group was divided into five subgroups. And also the control group was determined. The materials and composite were applied to demineralized enamel. For the shear bond analysis, a universal testing machine was used. Statistical analysis of the data was evaluated by one-way ANOVA test and independent t-test. Results: The result showed that there was no statistical difference between no resin infiltrant adhesive bonding agent groups (P < 0.05) and no difference between resin-treated groups and untreated groups of each bonding agent (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there is no difference between resin infiltrant pretreated adhesive bonding agent groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of different adhesive systems during restorative procedures after resin infiltration did not affect the shear bond strength.
树脂过滤或不过滤时不同粘结剂与脱矿搪瓷的剪切结合强度研究
目的:本研究旨在研究有树脂浸润和无树脂浸润的情况下,粘合剂与牙釉质表面的结合强度。材料和方法:将198颗人类切牙的牙冠和牙根分离,放入丙烯酸模具中。牙齿被打磨,直到用开槽钻头形成的导向槽消失。然后,将其放入脱矿溶液中,形成人工龋齿病变。将牙齿随机分为两个主要组,每个主要组分为五个亚组。并确定了对照组。将该材料和复合材料应用于脱矿搪瓷。对于剪切粘结分析,使用了通用测试机。数据的统计分析采用单因素方差分析和独立t检验进行评估。结果:无树脂浸胶剂组与树脂处理组比较差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),树脂浸渗剂预处理后的胶粘剂组间无差异(P<0.05)。结论:树脂浸渗后修复过程中使用不同的胶粘剂体系不会影响剪切强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信