Mechanical ventilation modes utilization. An international survey of clinicians

Ehab Daoud, Kimiyo H. Yamasaki, Ronald Sanderson, Mia Shokry
{"title":"Mechanical ventilation modes utilization. An international survey of clinicians","authors":"Ehab Daoud, Kimiyo H. Yamasaki, Ronald Sanderson, Mia Shokry","doi":"10.53097/jmv.10031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background There has been an exponential increase in modes of mechanical ventilation over the last couple decades. With this increase, there have been paucity of evidence of which mode is superior to others or much guidance to use a mode in different disease status causing respiratory failure. Methods: An international survey of six questions was posted on the “society of mechanical ventilation” website and advertised on social media over the period of four months. This is a descriptive study, results are presented in two different ways. First as the total modes used and secondly, per the geographical areas as the preferred mode, mode used mostly in ARDS, COPD, and Spontaneous weaning trials. Results: Conventional older modes, Volume-controlled and Pressure-controlled ventilation were used significantly more in general and in different disease states irrespective of geographical location. Four other modes were used almost equally in all disease states irrespective of geographical location. Pressure support ventilation was the most common mode used during the spontaneous breathing trial. Conclusion: There was large heterogenicity of modes used between clinicians in general, in different disease states and in between different international geographical locations. Mechanical ventilation modes utilization varies widely and remains a personal preference with no consensus between clinicians globally. Keywords: Modes of mechanical ventilation, ARDS, COPD, SBT, survey","PeriodicalId":73813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53097/jmv.10031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background There has been an exponential increase in modes of mechanical ventilation over the last couple decades. With this increase, there have been paucity of evidence of which mode is superior to others or much guidance to use a mode in different disease status causing respiratory failure. Methods: An international survey of six questions was posted on the “society of mechanical ventilation” website and advertised on social media over the period of four months. This is a descriptive study, results are presented in two different ways. First as the total modes used and secondly, per the geographical areas as the preferred mode, mode used mostly in ARDS, COPD, and Spontaneous weaning trials. Results: Conventional older modes, Volume-controlled and Pressure-controlled ventilation were used significantly more in general and in different disease states irrespective of geographical location. Four other modes were used almost equally in all disease states irrespective of geographical location. Pressure support ventilation was the most common mode used during the spontaneous breathing trial. Conclusion: There was large heterogenicity of modes used between clinicians in general, in different disease states and in between different international geographical locations. Mechanical ventilation modes utilization varies widely and remains a personal preference with no consensus between clinicians globally. Keywords: Modes of mechanical ventilation, ARDS, COPD, SBT, survey
机械通风方式的利用。一项国际临床医生调查
摘要:在过去的几十年里,机械通气的模式呈指数增长。随着这种增加,缺乏证据表明哪种模式优于其他模式,也没有太多指导在不同疾病状态下使用导致呼吸衰竭的模式。方法:在“机械通气学会”网站上发布一项包含6个问题的国际调查,并在社交媒体上进行为期4个月的宣传。这是一项描述性研究,结果以两种不同的方式呈现。首先是使用的总模式,其次,根据地理区域作为首选模式,主要用于ARDS, COPD和自发断奶试验。结果:传统的老式通气方式、容量控制通气和压力控制通气在不同疾病状态下的普遍使用和不同地理位置的使用均显著增加。其他四种模式在所有疾病状态中几乎同等使用,而不考虑地理位置。在自主呼吸试验中,压力支持通气是最常用的模式。结论:临床医生之间、不同疾病状态和不同国际地理位置之间使用的模式存在很大的异质性。机械通气方式的使用差异很大,仍然是个人偏好,全球临床医生之间没有共识。关键词:机械通气方式,ARDS, COPD, SBT,调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信