Le traitement statistique des proportions incluant l'analyse de variance, avec des exemples // The statistical handling of proportions including analysis of variance, with worked out examples
{"title":"Le traitement statistique des proportions incluant l'analyse de variance, avec des exemples // The statistical handling of proportions including analysis of variance, with worked out examples","authors":"L. Laurencelle","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.17.3.p272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The simple proportion, p = x/n , a pervasive statistical tool equally used in public and academic research areas, is in the literature still short of the necessary analytical implements needed for full-scale statistical treatments. This is partly ascribable to its discrete numerical character, but it proceeds mostly from its other distributional properties: its variance is tied up with its expectation, and its density shows a strong U-shaped asymmetry reactive to its π parameter, the habitual normal-based analytical procedures thus being contra-indicated. We here revive the Fisher-Yates angular transformation of the proportion, y ( x, n ) = sin − 1 √ x , heralded for its π -independent variance and smoothed-out non-normality, and put to trial three of its improved descendants (Ans-combe 1948, Tukey & Freeman 1950, Chanter 1975). Following a would-be thorough study of the three y functions retained (bias, variance, precision, test accuracy, power), largely documented in Laurencelle’s (2021a) investigation, we develop and illustrate the z test of significance on one proportion, the z test on the difference of two independent proportions, the analysis of variance of k ≥ 2 independent proportions and finally the test of two and anova of k correlated proportions . A critical appraisal of the McNemar test for the difference of two correlated proportions is also essayed.","PeriodicalId":93055,"journal":{"name":"The quantitative methods for psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quantitative methods for psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.17.3.p272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The simple proportion, p = x/n , a pervasive statistical tool equally used in public and academic research areas, is in the literature still short of the necessary analytical implements needed for full-scale statistical treatments. This is partly ascribable to its discrete numerical character, but it proceeds mostly from its other distributional properties: its variance is tied up with its expectation, and its density shows a strong U-shaped asymmetry reactive to its π parameter, the habitual normal-based analytical procedures thus being contra-indicated. We here revive the Fisher-Yates angular transformation of the proportion, y ( x, n ) = sin − 1 √ x , heralded for its π -independent variance and smoothed-out non-normality, and put to trial three of its improved descendants (Ans-combe 1948, Tukey & Freeman 1950, Chanter 1975). Following a would-be thorough study of the three y functions retained (bias, variance, precision, test accuracy, power), largely documented in Laurencelle’s (2021a) investigation, we develop and illustrate the z test of significance on one proportion, the z test on the difference of two independent proportions, the analysis of variance of k ≥ 2 independent proportions and finally the test of two and anova of k correlated proportions . A critical appraisal of the McNemar test for the difference of two correlated proportions is also essayed.