Le traitement statistique des proportions incluant l'analyse de variance, avec des exemples // The statistical handling of proportions including analysis of variance, with worked out examples

IF 1.3
L. Laurencelle
{"title":"Le traitement statistique des proportions incluant l'analyse de variance, avec des exemples // The statistical handling of proportions including analysis of variance, with worked out examples","authors":"L. Laurencelle","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.17.3.p272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The simple proportion, p = x/n , a pervasive statistical tool equally used in public and academic research areas, is in the literature still short of the necessary analytical implements needed for full-scale statistical treatments. This is partly ascribable to its discrete numerical character, but it proceeds mostly from its other distributional properties: its variance is tied up with its expectation, and its density shows a strong U-shaped asymmetry reactive to its π parameter, the habitual normal-based analytical procedures thus being contra-indicated. We here revive the Fisher-Yates angular transformation of the proportion, y ( x, n ) = sin − 1 √ x , heralded for its π -independent variance and smoothed-out non-normality, and put to trial three of its improved descendants (Ans-combe 1948, Tukey & Freeman 1950, Chanter 1975). Following a would-be thorough study of the three y functions retained (bias, variance, precision, test accuracy, power), largely documented in Laurencelle’s (2021a) investigation, we develop and illustrate the z test of significance on one proportion, the z test on the difference of two independent proportions, the analysis of variance of k ≥ 2 independent proportions and finally the test of two and anova of k correlated proportions . A critical appraisal of the McNemar test for the difference of two correlated proportions is also essayed.","PeriodicalId":93055,"journal":{"name":"The quantitative methods for psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quantitative methods for psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.17.3.p272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The simple proportion, p = x/n , a pervasive statistical tool equally used in public and academic research areas, is in the literature still short of the necessary analytical implements needed for full-scale statistical treatments. This is partly ascribable to its discrete numerical character, but it proceeds mostly from its other distributional properties: its variance is tied up with its expectation, and its density shows a strong U-shaped asymmetry reactive to its π parameter, the habitual normal-based analytical procedures thus being contra-indicated. We here revive the Fisher-Yates angular transformation of the proportion, y ( x, n ) = sin − 1 √ x , heralded for its π -independent variance and smoothed-out non-normality, and put to trial three of its improved descendants (Ans-combe 1948, Tukey & Freeman 1950, Chanter 1975). Following a would-be thorough study of the three y functions retained (bias, variance, precision, test accuracy, power), largely documented in Laurencelle’s (2021a) investigation, we develop and illustrate the z test of significance on one proportion, the z test on the difference of two independent proportions, the analysis of variance of k ≥ 2 independent proportions and finally the test of two and anova of k correlated proportions . A critical appraisal of the McNemar test for the difference of two correlated proportions is also essayed.
比例的统计处理,包括方差分析,包括工作示例
简单的比例p = x/n是公共和学术研究领域普遍使用的统计工具,在文献中仍然缺乏全面统计处理所需的必要分析工具。这部分归因于它的离散数值特征,但它主要来自于它的其他分布特性:它的方差与它的期望联系在一起,它的密度对它的π参数表现出强烈的u形不对称,因此习惯的基于正态的分析过程是矛盾的。我们在这里恢复了比例的Fisher-Yates角变换,y (x, n) = sin - 1√x,预示着它的π无关方差和平滑的非正态性,并尝试了它的三个改进的后代(Ans-combe 1948, Tukey & Freeman 1950, Chanter 1975)。在对Laurencelle (2021a)调查中主要记录的保留的三个y函数(bias, variance, precision, test accuracy, power)进行了彻底的研究之后,我们开发并说明了一个比例的显著性z检验,两个独立比例的差异z检验,k≥2个独立比例的方差分析以及k相关比例的两个和方差分析。对两个相关比例差异的McNemar检验的关键评价也进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信