The Blues Scale: Historical and Epistemological Considerations

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Asher Tobin Chodos
{"title":"The Blues Scale: Historical and Epistemological Considerations","authors":"Asher Tobin Chodos","doi":"10.1080/17494060.2019.1616872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Today, the blues scale is familiar to most people who have studied music formally. Although there has been since 1967 a broad consensus as to what that scale is, for the first half of the twentieth century there was actually a good deal of disagreement on that point. A close look at the history of the blues scale reveals that disagreements over its content are bound up with widespread ambiguity concerning its epistemological status. This paper seeks to illuminate that epistemological confusion, proceeding in two ways: first, it historicizes today’s blues scale by laying out the main blues scales proposed between 1938 and 1967, attending to the role these scales played in the institutionalization of jazz education; second, it demonstrates that these scales differ not just in content and attitude but also in epistemological orientation. Because of its social overtones and political implications, disagreements over the nature (and even existence) of the blues scale have frequently been heated. This paper argues that these disagreements derive in part from a persistent epistemological confusion that has characterized much of the discourse surrounding this musical idea.","PeriodicalId":39826,"journal":{"name":"Jazz Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17494060.2019.1616872","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jazz Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17494060.2019.1616872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Today, the blues scale is familiar to most people who have studied music formally. Although there has been since 1967 a broad consensus as to what that scale is, for the first half of the twentieth century there was actually a good deal of disagreement on that point. A close look at the history of the blues scale reveals that disagreements over its content are bound up with widespread ambiguity concerning its epistemological status. This paper seeks to illuminate that epistemological confusion, proceeding in two ways: first, it historicizes today’s blues scale by laying out the main blues scales proposed between 1938 and 1967, attending to the role these scales played in the institutionalization of jazz education; second, it demonstrates that these scales differ not just in content and attitude but also in epistemological orientation. Because of its social overtones and political implications, disagreements over the nature (and even existence) of the blues scale have frequently been heated. This paper argues that these disagreements derive in part from a persistent epistemological confusion that has characterized much of the discourse surrounding this musical idea.
布鲁斯音阶:历史和认识论的考虑
今天,布鲁斯音阶对于大多数正式学习音乐的人来说都是熟悉的。尽管自1967年以来,人们对这一比例有了广泛的共识,但在20世纪上半叶,在这一点上实际上存在很多分歧。仔细研究蓝调音阶的历史就会发现,对其内容的分歧与其认识论地位的广泛模糊联系在一起。本文试图阐明这种认识论上的困惑,从两个方面着手:首先,通过列出1938年至1967年间提出的主要蓝调音阶,将今天的蓝调音阶历史化,并关注这些音阶在爵士乐教育制度化中所起的作用;其次,它表明这些量表不仅在内容和态度上存在差异,而且在认识论取向上也存在差异。由于它的社会色彩和政治含义,关于蓝调音阶的性质(甚至存在)的分歧经常被激化。本文认为,这些分歧部分源于一种持续的认识论混乱,这种混乱已经成为围绕这一音乐理念的许多话语的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jazz Perspectives
Jazz Perspectives Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信