Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis and Least-Cost Path on The Highway Route Planning: A Case Study of Bawen – Yogyakarta Highway, Indonesia

Q4 Social Sciences
B. Marjuki, I. Rudiarto
{"title":"Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis and Least-Cost Path on The Highway Route Planning: A Case Study of Bawen – Yogyakarta Highway, Indonesia","authors":"B. Marjuki, I. Rudiarto","doi":"10.14710/GEOPLANNING.7.2.113-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infrastructure planning ideally not only considers the geotechnical aspects and physical conditions of the infrastructure development location but also must be able to support regional development. One kind of spatial analysis technique which has capabilities to integrate various regional characteristics associated with its suitability for a particular use is spatial multi-criteria analysis. By using Bawen-Yogyakarta Toll Road Plan as a case study, this research is intended to apply route planning that takes into account regional characteristics, through the involvement of Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process, and Least Cost Path analysis. The analysis results then compared with the government preferred route to see its advantages and disadvantages.  The results show that the generated route from the analysis has several advantages over the government preferred route, while also having some shortcomings. The advantages of route analysis results compared to government preference routes include: better able to avoid earthquake and landslide-prone areas, better support to the preservation of protected areas, has more areas with flat to gentle topography, and have smaller additional construction cost as the consequences of intersection with existing roads, rivers and railways, In terms of affected land-use, generated route also has minimum negative impacts on the sustainability of agricultural land in the study area.  The shortcomings of the analysis result are: not yet able to avoid flood and volcanic eruptions-prone areas as well as government’s preferences route, higher land acquisition cost estimation, and less support for industrial and tourism activities in the research area. Improvement of analysis methods, data, and cost assessment strategy is needed to obtain better results and more appropriate modeling and analysis, in order to support regional infrastructure planning and development.","PeriodicalId":30789,"journal":{"name":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","volume":"7 1","pages":"113-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.7.2.113-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infrastructure planning ideally not only considers the geotechnical aspects and physical conditions of the infrastructure development location but also must be able to support regional development. One kind of spatial analysis technique which has capabilities to integrate various regional characteristics associated with its suitability for a particular use is spatial multi-criteria analysis. By using Bawen-Yogyakarta Toll Road Plan as a case study, this research is intended to apply route planning that takes into account regional characteristics, through the involvement of Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process, and Least Cost Path analysis. The analysis results then compared with the government preferred route to see its advantages and disadvantages.  The results show that the generated route from the analysis has several advantages over the government preferred route, while also having some shortcomings. The advantages of route analysis results compared to government preference routes include: better able to avoid earthquake and landslide-prone areas, better support to the preservation of protected areas, has more areas with flat to gentle topography, and have smaller additional construction cost as the consequences of intersection with existing roads, rivers and railways, In terms of affected land-use, generated route also has minimum negative impacts on the sustainability of agricultural land in the study area.  The shortcomings of the analysis result are: not yet able to avoid flood and volcanic eruptions-prone areas as well as government’s preferences route, higher land acquisition cost estimation, and less support for industrial and tourism activities in the research area. Improvement of analysis methods, data, and cost assessment strategy is needed to obtain better results and more appropriate modeling and analysis, in order to support regional infrastructure planning and development.
公路路线规划的空间多准则分析与最小成本路径——以印尼巴温至日惹公路为例
理想情况下,基础设施规划不仅考虑基础设施开发位置的岩土工程方面和物理条件,而且必须能够支持区域发展。一种空间分析技术是空间多标准分析,它能够整合与其适合特定用途相关的各种区域特征。本研究以巴温-日惹收费公路规划为例,通过空间多准则分析、层次分析法和最小成本路径分析,应用考虑区域特征的路线规划。然后将分析结果与政府偏好的路线进行比较,以了解其优缺点。结果表明,与政府偏好的路线相比,分析生成的路线有几个优点,但也有一些缺点。与政府偏好的路线相比,路线分析结果的优势包括:能够更好地避开地震和滑坡易发地区,更好地支持保护区的保护,拥有更多地形平坦至平缓的地区,以及与现有道路、河流和铁路交叉所带来的额外建设成本较小,就受影响的土地使用而言,生成路线对研究区域农业用地可持续性的负面影响也最小。分析结果的缺点是:无法避开洪水和火山爆发多发地区以及政府的偏好路线,土地征用成本估计较高,对研究区工业和旅游活动的支持较少。需要改进分析方法、数据和成本评估策略,以获得更好的结果和更合适的建模和分析,从而支持区域基础设施规划和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信