A Study on Residents' Perception towards the Importance of Forest Therapy in the Central Region of China: Based on the Cases in Korea

Q3 Social Sciences
Hui Shi, Jin-Young Jeon, Jin-Gun Kim, W. Shin
{"title":"A Study on Residents' Perception towards the Importance of Forest Therapy in the Central Region of China: Based on the Cases in Korea","authors":"Hui Shi, Jin-Young Jeon, Jin-Gun Kim, W. Shin","doi":"10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.1.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: Recently, forest therapy has received strong support from the Chinese government and gradually embarked on the road of development. However, compared with South Korea, forest therapy started late in China. And it is still in the exploration stage of theoretical research and industrial practice. To study the development of forest therapy in China, we review the legal system and development of forest therapy in Korea. This study uses online surveys to help us understand the level of awareness of the importance of forest therapy in central China. And it also provides a reference for the further development of forest therapy in China.Methods: The methods used for this analysis were Chi-square test, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), and one-way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) .Results: Our findings showed that the perception about forest therapy was significantly different among people with different educational level (χ² = 25.526, p < .001). The cognition of forest therapy is significantly different from the cognition of the importance of natural healing projects (p < .001) and pro-environmental projects (p < .001). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the perception towards the importance of 18 forest therapy facilities and 9 industrial development influencing factors with or without forest therapy awareness.Conclusion: The conclusion is that our participants have low awareness of forest therapy, but they have great expectations of forest therapy. In addition, the forest environment and emergency medical facilities reflect the recognition of the importance, including treatment programs, treatment facilities and factors affecting industrial development. Therefore, considering the successful experience of forest therapy in Korea, this study proposes practical measures to strengthen publicity, facility construction and treatment program development.","PeriodicalId":52383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.1.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Recently, forest therapy has received strong support from the Chinese government and gradually embarked on the road of development. However, compared with South Korea, forest therapy started late in China. And it is still in the exploration stage of theoretical research and industrial practice. To study the development of forest therapy in China, we review the legal system and development of forest therapy in Korea. This study uses online surveys to help us understand the level of awareness of the importance of forest therapy in central China. And it also provides a reference for the further development of forest therapy in China.Methods: The methods used for this analysis were Chi-square test, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), and one-way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) .Results: Our findings showed that the perception about forest therapy was significantly different among people with different educational level (χ² = 25.526, p < .001). The cognition of forest therapy is significantly different from the cognition of the importance of natural healing projects (p < .001) and pro-environmental projects (p < .001). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the perception towards the importance of 18 forest therapy facilities and 9 industrial development influencing factors with or without forest therapy awareness.Conclusion: The conclusion is that our participants have low awareness of forest therapy, but they have great expectations of forest therapy. In addition, the forest environment and emergency medical facilities reflect the recognition of the importance, including treatment programs, treatment facilities and factors affecting industrial development. Therefore, considering the successful experience of forest therapy in Korea, this study proposes practical measures to strengthen publicity, facility construction and treatment program development.
中部地区居民对森林疗法重要性的认知研究——以韩国为例
背景与目的:近年来,森林疗法得到了中国政府的大力支持,逐步走上发展之路。然而,与韩国相比,森林疗法在中国起步较晚。目前还处于理论研究和产业实践的探索阶段。为了研究森林疗法在中国的发展,我们回顾了韩国森林疗法的法律制度和发展。这项研究使用在线调查来帮助我们了解中国中部地区对森林疗法重要性的认识水平。方法:采用卡方检验、单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、主成分分析(PCA)等方法,结果:我们的研究结果表明,不同文化水平的人对森林疗法的认知存在显著差异(χ²=25.526,p<.001)。森林疗法的认识与自然愈合项目(p<.001(p<0.001)。此外,在有或没有森林治疗意识的情况下,对18个森林治疗设施和9个工业发展影响因素的重要性的认知存在显著差异。结论:我们的参与者对森林疗法的认识较低,但对森林疗法有很大的期望。此外,森林环境和应急医疗设施体现了对重要性的认识,包括治疗方案、治疗设施和影响产业发展的因素。因此,考虑到韩国森林疗法的成功经验,本研究提出了加强宣传、设施建设和治疗方案制定的切实可行的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信