Abortion, Science, and Morality in the Turnaway Study: New Perspectives for the Helping Professions

IF 2.3 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Sam Coleman
{"title":"Abortion, Science, and Morality in the Turnaway Study: New Perspectives for the Helping Professions","authors":"Sam Coleman","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2022.2037821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among its guarantees of physical and mental well-being, a just and healthy society provides its people self-determination in reproduction. For women, control over reproduction is key to attaining well-being and equality with men, but the United States falls woefully below that ideal today, and the flashpoint of struggle for improvement is the availability of induced abortion. Despite the commonality of abortion in today’s America – at least one in four women will have had one in her lifetime (Jones & Jerman, 2017) – arguments about the procedure are as bitter as ever, and an ideological fog obscures crucial facts and concepts concerning abortion’s significance for women and their families.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":"33 1","pages":"96 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2022.2037821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among its guarantees of physical and mental well-being, a just and healthy society provides its people self-determination in reproduction. For women, control over reproduction is key to attaining well-being and equality with men, but the United States falls woefully below that ideal today, and the flashpoint of struggle for improvement is the availability of induced abortion. Despite the commonality of abortion in today’s America – at least one in four women will have had one in her lifetime (Jones & Jerman, 2017) – arguments about the procedure are as bitter as ever, and an ideological fog obscures crucial facts and concepts concerning abortion’s significance for women and their families.
拒绝研究中的堕胎、科学与道德:帮助专业的新视角
在保证身心健康的同时,一个公正和健康的社会为人民提供了生育的自决权。对女性来说,控制生育是实现幸福和与男性平等的关键,但美国今天远远低于这一理想,而寻求改善的斗争爆发点是人工流产的可用性。尽管堕胎在当今美国很常见——至少四分之一的女性一生中都会堕胎(Jones&Jerman,2017)——但关于堕胎程序的争论一如既往地激烈,意识形态的迷雾掩盖了有关堕胎对女性及其家庭意义的关键事实和概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信