Homicide Trends and Types in 1920s-1930s Lithuania: Limitations of Official Statistics

Sigita Černevičiūtė
{"title":"Homicide Trends and Types in 1920s-1930s Lithuania: Limitations of Official Statistics","authors":"Sigita Černevičiūtė","doi":"10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article calls into question the reliability of the official historical statistical sources of homicides in 1920s-1930s Lithuania and aims to evaluate the limitations of the mentioned sources. With this in mind, we will attempt to make some assumptions about homicide types and trends in interwar Lithuania. The Central Statistical Bureau had been publishing statistical data relevant to the investigation of homicides in Statistical Bulletins and the Statistical Yearbooks of Lithuania since 1924. These statistical sources in the homicide study were problematic due to an unclear data collection methodology, the use of different homicide terms, unrealistic definitions of urban and rural areas and changes in Lithuania’s territory and population. We cannot determine the exact rates of the 1930s homicides due to the change in the homicide terminology and its content. Between 1924-1931 the term violent deaths, except suicides, was used, and homicides were not singled out. The analysis also shows that until 1931 violent deaths included homicides and accidental deaths too. From 1932 to 1939 violent deaths were divided into 4 groups: suicide, homicide, accidents and other violence. The more detailed data of the 1930s have revealed that the most frequent victims of homicide were in the 15-29 and 29-44 age groups for men, while the 15-29 age group stands out for females. The most common method of killing was shooting. The police-published homicide statistics also reveal a problem of terminology. According to the Penal Statute of Lithuania, deprivation of life was distinguished into the crimes of homicide; infanticide; abortion; preparation to murder; attempted murder and persuasion and help to commit suicide. However, this terminology was only partially reflected in the police statistics, as between 1927-1930 the police used the term homicides and classified them into the ones committed: for-profit; during brawls; for other purposes. Infanticide was separated from homicides. Leaving out others, infanticide was the most common murder type in interwar Lithuania. Since 1931 the statistics of the police had been using the term of deprivation of life and distinguished it into the 7 types according to the motive: for-profit; during brawls; defending one’s own life or the lives of others; involuntary; infanticide; abortion and for other purposes. It did not include dead bodies found, suicides and accidental deaths. After analysing the 1931-1938 data on deprivation of life, excluding abortions, homicides would vary from 200 to 300 per year. When comparing all the deprivations of life with homicides by the cause of death, it can be concluded that these figures included preparation for murder and attempted murder as well as persuasion and help to commit suicide. Thus, due to the change in the terminology and the inclusion of attempted murders, the police statistics can be considered unreliable. Homicides are the most precisely quantitatively defined by the rates of causes of death, which in 1932-1938 Lithuania were relatively stable with an amplitude of 93-139 murders per year. On a basis of the analysis of the police statistical data, it is possible to identify at least 4 main types of homicides in interwar Lithuania: reproductive – infanticide and abortions, aggressive – killings during brawls, economic - for profit as well as unintentional homicides that happened during accidents.","PeriodicalId":52861,"journal":{"name":"Kriminologijos studijos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kriminologijos studijos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article calls into question the reliability of the official historical statistical sources of homicides in 1920s-1930s Lithuania and aims to evaluate the limitations of the mentioned sources. With this in mind, we will attempt to make some assumptions about homicide types and trends in interwar Lithuania. The Central Statistical Bureau had been publishing statistical data relevant to the investigation of homicides in Statistical Bulletins and the Statistical Yearbooks of Lithuania since 1924. These statistical sources in the homicide study were problematic due to an unclear data collection methodology, the use of different homicide terms, unrealistic definitions of urban and rural areas and changes in Lithuania’s territory and population. We cannot determine the exact rates of the 1930s homicides due to the change in the homicide terminology and its content. Between 1924-1931 the term violent deaths, except suicides, was used, and homicides were not singled out. The analysis also shows that until 1931 violent deaths included homicides and accidental deaths too. From 1932 to 1939 violent deaths were divided into 4 groups: suicide, homicide, accidents and other violence. The more detailed data of the 1930s have revealed that the most frequent victims of homicide were in the 15-29 and 29-44 age groups for men, while the 15-29 age group stands out for females. The most common method of killing was shooting. The police-published homicide statistics also reveal a problem of terminology. According to the Penal Statute of Lithuania, deprivation of life was distinguished into the crimes of homicide; infanticide; abortion; preparation to murder; attempted murder and persuasion and help to commit suicide. However, this terminology was only partially reflected in the police statistics, as between 1927-1930 the police used the term homicides and classified them into the ones committed: for-profit; during brawls; for other purposes. Infanticide was separated from homicides. Leaving out others, infanticide was the most common murder type in interwar Lithuania. Since 1931 the statistics of the police had been using the term of deprivation of life and distinguished it into the 7 types according to the motive: for-profit; during brawls; defending one’s own life or the lives of others; involuntary; infanticide; abortion and for other purposes. It did not include dead bodies found, suicides and accidental deaths. After analysing the 1931-1938 data on deprivation of life, excluding abortions, homicides would vary from 200 to 300 per year. When comparing all the deprivations of life with homicides by the cause of death, it can be concluded that these figures included preparation for murder and attempted murder as well as persuasion and help to commit suicide. Thus, due to the change in the terminology and the inclusion of attempted murders, the police statistics can be considered unreliable. Homicides are the most precisely quantitatively defined by the rates of causes of death, which in 1932-1938 Lithuania were relatively stable with an amplitude of 93-139 murders per year. On a basis of the analysis of the police statistical data, it is possible to identify at least 4 main types of homicides in interwar Lithuania: reproductive – infanticide and abortions, aggressive – killings during brawls, economic - for profit as well as unintentional homicides that happened during accidents.
20世纪20年代至30年代立陶宛的杀人趋势和类型:官方统计的局限性
本文对20世纪20年代至30年代立陶宛凶杀案的官方历史统计来源的可靠性提出质疑,并旨在评估上述来源的局限性。考虑到这一点,我们将尝试对两次世界大战立陶宛的凶杀类型和趋势做出一些假设。自1924年以来,中央统计局一直在立陶宛的《统计公报》和《统计年鉴》中公布与凶杀案调查有关的统计数据。由于数据收集方法不明确、使用了不同的凶杀术语、对城市和农村地区的定义不切实际以及立陶宛领土和人口的变化,凶杀案研究中的这些统计来源存在问题。由于凶杀术语及其内容的变化,我们无法确定20世纪30年代凶杀案的确切发生率。在1924-1931年间,除了自杀,暴力死亡一词被使用,凶杀案也没有被单独列出。分析还显示,直到1931年,暴力死亡还包括凶杀和意外死亡。从1932年到1939年,暴力死亡分为4类:自杀、凶杀、事故和其他暴力。20世纪30年代更详细的数据显示,男性最常见的凶杀案受害者是15-29岁和29-44岁年龄组,而女性则以15-29岁年龄组最为突出。最常见的杀人方法是开枪。警方公布的凶杀案统计数据也揭示了一个术语问题。根据《立陶宛刑法》,剥夺生命被区分为杀人罪;杀婴;流产准备谋杀;企图谋杀、劝说和帮助自杀。然而,这一术语仅部分反映在警方统计数据中,因为在1927-1930年间,警方使用了杀人一词,并将其归类为犯罪:营利性;打架时;用于其他目的。杀害婴儿与杀人是分开的。撇开其他人不谈,杀婴是两次世界大战期间立陶宛最常见的谋杀类型。自1931年以来,警方的统计数据一直使用剥夺生命一词,并根据动机将其分为7类:营利性;打架时;保护自己或他人的生命;无意识的杀婴;堕胎和其他目的。它不包括发现的尸体、自杀和意外死亡。在分析了1931-1938年关于剥夺生命(不包括堕胎)的数据后,每年的凶杀案将从200起到300起不等。将所有剥夺生命的行为与按死因划分的杀人行为进行比较,可以得出结论,这些数字包括为谋杀和谋杀未遂做准备,以及说服和帮助自杀。因此,由于术语的变化和谋杀未遂的列入,警方的统计数据可能被认为是不可靠的。凶杀案是最精确的死因定量定义,1932-1938年立陶宛的死因相对稳定,每年有93-139起谋杀案。根据对警方统计数据的分析,可以确定两次世界大战期间立陶宛至少有4种主要类型的凶杀案:生殖性——杀婴和堕胎、攻击性——斗殴中的杀人、经济性——谋利以及事故中发生的非故意杀人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信