Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of health-related quality of life and mental well-being between persons with and without post COVID-19 condition.

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-05-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2023.1144162
Emily Stella Scott, Erica I Lubetkin, Mathieu F Janssen, John Yfantopolous, Gouke J Bonsel, Juanita A Haagsma
{"title":"Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of health-related quality of life and mental well-being between persons with and without post COVID-19 condition.","authors":"Emily Stella Scott, Erica I Lubetkin, Mathieu F Janssen, John Yfantopolous, Gouke J Bonsel, Juanita A Haagsma","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2023.1144162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Still little is known about the impact of post COVID-19 condition (PC) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mental well-being. We compared participants with PC with three groups: an acute COVID-19 infection (AC) only, at least one chronic condition (CC) but no COVID-19, or no condition at all, healthy (PH). Between these disease groups, we also estimated and compared HRQOL and mental well-being change over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from six countries (Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States) completed two web-based questionnaires (T1 = April-May 2020 and T2 = April-June 2022). Primary outcomes were HRQOL, measured by EQ-5D-5L and EQ VAS, and mental well-being (measured by World Health Organisation-Five (WHO-5) Well-Being Index, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7). All analyses were stratified by the disease groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4,999 participants filled out both surveys: 240 were in PC, 107 in AC, 1798 in CC and 2,854 in PH. At T2, the mean EQ-5D-5L index values for the PC, AC, CC and PH groups were 0.70, 0.73, 0.75 and 0.92 (<i>p</i> < .001), respectively. Mean EQ VAS scores were 66, 65, 68 and 81 (<i>p</i> < .001), respectively. Poor mental well-being, depression and anxiety mean values were highest in the PC group (47.7; 9.1; 7.4), followed by the AC group (51.1; 7.7; 5.7), CC group (56.1; 5.2; 4.2) and the PH group (65.6; 2.8; 2.5), respectively (<i>p</i> < .001 between groups). Over time, HRQOL deteriorated in all groups, apart from the PH group. We observed the largest deterioration in the CC (EQ-5D-5L index: Δ0.03, <i>p</i> < .001) and AC group (EQ VAS: Δ6.3, <i>p</i> < .001). For the mental well-being outcomes, deterioration for WHO-5 and PHQ-9 were largest in the AC group (Δ4.8, <i>p</i> = .016; Δ-1.3, <i>p</i> = .012). Rates for GAD-7 improved for the PH and CC groups (PH: Δ1.27, CC: Δ0.56, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the cross-sectional analysis, participants with PC had the worst HRQOL and mental well-being compared to the other groups. In terms of change since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, HRQOL and mental well-being deterioration was highest among AC participants and had a lower impact among PC participants, most likely due to pre-existing chronic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1144162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2023.1144162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Still little is known about the impact of post COVID-19 condition (PC) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mental well-being. We compared participants with PC with three groups: an acute COVID-19 infection (AC) only, at least one chronic condition (CC) but no COVID-19, or no condition at all, healthy (PH). Between these disease groups, we also estimated and compared HRQOL and mental well-being change over time.

Methods: Participants from six countries (Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States) completed two web-based questionnaires (T1 = April-May 2020 and T2 = April-June 2022). Primary outcomes were HRQOL, measured by EQ-5D-5L and EQ VAS, and mental well-being (measured by World Health Organisation-Five (WHO-5) Well-Being Index, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7). All analyses were stratified by the disease groups.

Results: In total, 4,999 participants filled out both surveys: 240 were in PC, 107 in AC, 1798 in CC and 2,854 in PH. At T2, the mean EQ-5D-5L index values for the PC, AC, CC and PH groups were 0.70, 0.73, 0.75 and 0.92 (p < .001), respectively. Mean EQ VAS scores were 66, 65, 68 and 81 (p < .001), respectively. Poor mental well-being, depression and anxiety mean values were highest in the PC group (47.7; 9.1; 7.4), followed by the AC group (51.1; 7.7; 5.7), CC group (56.1; 5.2; 4.2) and the PH group (65.6; 2.8; 2.5), respectively (p < .001 between groups). Over time, HRQOL deteriorated in all groups, apart from the PH group. We observed the largest deterioration in the CC (EQ-5D-5L index: Δ0.03, p < .001) and AC group (EQ VAS: Δ6.3, p < .001). For the mental well-being outcomes, deterioration for WHO-5 and PHQ-9 were largest in the AC group (Δ4.8, p = .016; Δ-1.3, p = .012). Rates for GAD-7 improved for the PH and CC groups (PH: Δ1.27, CC: Δ0.56, p < .001).

Conclusions: In the cross-sectional analysis, participants with PC had the worst HRQOL and mental well-being compared to the other groups. In terms of change since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, HRQOL and mental well-being deterioration was highest among AC participants and had a lower impact among PC participants, most likely due to pre-existing chronic disease.

有和没有COVID-19后病情的人与健康相关的生活质量和心理健康的横断面和纵向比较
关于COVID-19后病情(PC)对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和心理健康的影响,我们知之甚少。我们将PC参与者分为三组:仅急性COVID-19感染(AC),至少一种慢性疾病(CC)但没有COVID-19,或根本没有疾病,健康(PH)。在这些疾病组之间,我们还估计并比较了HRQOL和心理健康随时间的变化。方法来自六个国家(希腊、意大利、荷兰、瑞典、英国和美国)的参与者完成了两份基于网络的问卷调查(T1 = 2020年4月至5月,T2 = 2022年4月至6月)。主要结局是HRQOL(由EQ- 5d - 5l和EQ VAS测量)和精神健康(由世界卫生组织第五版(WHO-5)幸福指数、患者健康问卷(PHQ)-9和一般焦虑障碍(GAD)-7测量)。所有分析均按疾病组进行分层。结果共4999名参与者填写了两项调查,其中PC组240人,AC组107人,CC组1798人,PH组2854人。在T2时,PC组、AC组、CC组和PH组的EQ-5D-5L指数平均值分别为0.70、0.73、0.75和0.92 (p < 0.001)。平均EQ VAS评分分别为66、65、68、81分(p < 0.001)。心理健康状况不佳、抑郁和焦虑的平均值在PC组最高(47.7;9.1;7.4),其次是AC组(51.1;7.7;5.7), CC组(56.1;5.2;4.2)和PH组(65.6;2.8;2.5), p <。组间0.001)。随着时间的推移,除PH组外,所有组的HRQOL均恶化。我们观察到CC组(EQ- 5d - 5l指数:Δ0.03, p < .001)和AC组(EQ VAS: Δ6.3, p < .001)恶化最大。对于心理健康结果,AC组的WHO-5和PHQ-9的恶化最大(Δ4.8, p = 0.016;Δ-1.3, p = .012)。PH组和CC组的GAD-7率均有所提高(PH: Δ1.27, CC: Δ0.56, p < 0.001)。在横断面分析中,与其他组相比,PC参与者的HRQOL和心理健康状况最差。就COVID-19大流行开始以来的变化而言,AC参与者的HRQOL和精神健康恶化最高,PC参与者的影响较低,很可能是由于已有的慢性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信