“Elite but not elitist”: Negotiating race, place, class, and culture in public physical activity spaces

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Andrew Carter, Michael S. Dao, Adam C. Alexander, Vicky Gomez
{"title":"“Elite but not elitist”: Negotiating race, place, class, and culture in public physical activity spaces","authors":"Andrew Carter, Michael S. Dao, Adam C. Alexander, Vicky Gomez","doi":"10.1080/2159676X.2023.2187442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study critically examines issues related to race, place, class, and culture within public physical activity spaces. Drawing on Fairclough’s (1992) three-dimensional framework for analyzing discourse and Neckerman et al.’s (1999) minority culture of mobility, we examined the historical narratives of founders and leaders at ALL4ONE (n=7), a free, Black, Indigenous, People-of-Color-led (BIPOC) fitness community based in San Francisco, CA (the original name has been changed for purposes of anonymity). The analysis revealed that ALL4ONE allowed members to navigate race and class-based tensions by discursively constructing a refuge to share cultural norms and experiences, strengthen in-group networks, and politically mobilize; nonetheless, its social space reproduced unintended discursive barriers in situations when in-group members wanted to engage lower-income co-ethnics, limiting the effectiveness of the organization’s missionary ethos—particularly regarding its ability to implement social justice initiatives and assert embodied power in dominant cultural spaces. Study findings highlight important nuances in how BIPOC communities navigate public physical activity spaces and challenge monolithic framings of race and culture in physical activity interventions.","PeriodicalId":48542,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"692 - 713"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2023.2187442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study critically examines issues related to race, place, class, and culture within public physical activity spaces. Drawing on Fairclough’s (1992) three-dimensional framework for analyzing discourse and Neckerman et al.’s (1999) minority culture of mobility, we examined the historical narratives of founders and leaders at ALL4ONE (n=7), a free, Black, Indigenous, People-of-Color-led (BIPOC) fitness community based in San Francisco, CA (the original name has been changed for purposes of anonymity). The analysis revealed that ALL4ONE allowed members to navigate race and class-based tensions by discursively constructing a refuge to share cultural norms and experiences, strengthen in-group networks, and politically mobilize; nonetheless, its social space reproduced unintended discursive barriers in situations when in-group members wanted to engage lower-income co-ethnics, limiting the effectiveness of the organization’s missionary ethos—particularly regarding its ability to implement social justice initiatives and assert embodied power in dominant cultural spaces. Study findings highlight important nuances in how BIPOC communities navigate public physical activity spaces and challenge monolithic framings of race and culture in physical activity interventions.
“精英但不是精英”:在公共体育活动空间中谈判种族、地点、阶级和文化
摘要本研究批判性地考察了公共体育活动空间中与种族、地点、阶级和文化相关的问题。根据Fairclough(1992)的三维话语分析框架和Neckerman等人(1999)的少数民族流动文化,我们研究了ALL4ONE(n=7)创始人和领导人的历史叙述,ALL4ONE是一个位于加利福尼亚州旧金山的自由、黑人、土著、有色人种(BIPOC)健身社区(为了匿名,原名已更改)。分析显示,ALL4ONE允许成员通过随意构建避难所来应对基于种族和阶级的紧张局势,以分享文化规范和经验,加强群体网络,并进行政治动员;尽管如此,当团体成员希望与低收入的同族人士接触时,其社会空间再现了意想不到的话语障碍,限制了该组织传教精神的有效性,尤其是在其实施社会正义倡议和在主导文化空间中维护具体权力的能力方面。研究结果强调了BIPOC社区如何驾驭公共体育活动空间,并在体育活动干预中挑战种族和文化的单一框架的重要细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信