DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF EDUCATIONAL NETWORK DISCOURSE: DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPTS OF “EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE”, “SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE” AND “EDUCATION NETWORK DISCOURSE”

H. Truba
{"title":"DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF EDUCATIONAL NETWORK DISCOURSE: DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPTS OF “EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE”, “SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE” AND “EDUCATION NETWORK DISCOURSE”","authors":"H. Truba","doi":"10.18524/2414-0627.2022.29.262420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to distinguishing a new discourse - the educational network, which is a completely new unit that has not been studied before, from traditional scientific and pedagogical discourses and its characteristics according to the classical established scheme of structuring discourses. In the modern world of digitization and automation of various processes, science and education do not stand aside, and the teacher is at the forefront of changes - scientific and pedagogical discourses undergo not only formal, but also qualitative changes, which are caused by the search for new educational paradigms and concepts, principles and approaches to the organization of educational process, as well as methods, forms and means of teaching students, the introduction of technological innovations that will contribute to the improvement of the quality of foreign language philological education. All this could not fail to fundamentally change the structures of these discourses and lead to the formation of new ones. The purpose of the study is to separate the educational network discourse into a separate structural unit. The task: to analyze the online “life” of Ukrainian educators and, based on this research, to describe the structure of educational network discourse.The object of the study is the educational network discourse, and the subject of the study is the definition of the main differential features inherent in any discourse. The actual material is a collection of materials on social networks “Intagram”, “Facebook”, “YouTube”, “TikTok”. In total, more than 500 pages of both well-known and notable figures in the Ukrainian educational space (the official pages of I. D. Farion and O. M. Avramenko) and little-known ones have been processed. Among the general scientific methods, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, observation were used, in particular not included (observation of official pages); descriptive. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it is the first attempt to study the educational network discourse, which is widely represented in today’s society. Therefore, the educational network discourse is not purely institutional, but is an argumentative, informational, socially ritual institutional-household mediated type of discourse.","PeriodicalId":33930,"journal":{"name":"Zapiski z ukrayins''kogo movoznavstva","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zapiski z ukrayins''kogo movoznavstva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2414-0627.2022.29.262420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article is devoted to distinguishing a new discourse - the educational network, which is a completely new unit that has not been studied before, from traditional scientific and pedagogical discourses and its characteristics according to the classical established scheme of structuring discourses. In the modern world of digitization and automation of various processes, science and education do not stand aside, and the teacher is at the forefront of changes - scientific and pedagogical discourses undergo not only formal, but also qualitative changes, which are caused by the search for new educational paradigms and concepts, principles and approaches to the organization of educational process, as well as methods, forms and means of teaching students, the introduction of technological innovations that will contribute to the improvement of the quality of foreign language philological education. All this could not fail to fundamentally change the structures of these discourses and lead to the formation of new ones. The purpose of the study is to separate the educational network discourse into a separate structural unit. The task: to analyze the online “life” of Ukrainian educators and, based on this research, to describe the structure of educational network discourse.The object of the study is the educational network discourse, and the subject of the study is the definition of the main differential features inherent in any discourse. The actual material is a collection of materials on social networks “Intagram”, “Facebook”, “YouTube”, “TikTok”. In total, more than 500 pages of both well-known and notable figures in the Ukrainian educational space (the official pages of I. D. Farion and O. M. Avramenko) and little-known ones have been processed. Among the general scientific methods, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, observation were used, in particular not included (observation of official pages); descriptive. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it is the first attempt to study the educational network discourse, which is widely represented in today’s society. Therefore, the educational network discourse is not purely institutional, but is an argumentative, informational, socially ritual institutional-household mediated type of discourse.
教育网话语概念界定:“教育话语”、“科学话语”、“教育网络话语”概念界定
本文试图根据经典的既定话语建构方案,从传统的科学与教学话语中区分出一个全新的、未曾被研究过的话语单元——教育网络及其特征。在各种过程数字化和自动化的现代世界中,科学和教育并没有被搁置,教师处于变革的最前沿——科学和教学话语不仅经历了形式上的变化,而且还经历了质变,这是由于寻找新的教育范式和概念、原则和方法来组织教育过程,以及教学方法、形式和手段。引进有助于提高外语语文教育质量的技术创新。所有这些都必然会从根本上改变这些话语的结构,并导致新话语的形成。本研究的目的是将教育网络话语分离为一个独立的结构单元。任务:分析乌克兰教育工作者的在线“生活”,并在此基础上描述教育网络话语的结构。本文研究的对象是教育网络话语,研究的主题是定义任何话语所固有的主要差异特征。实际材料是“instagram”、“Facebook”、“YouTube”、“TikTok”等社交网络上的材料集合。总共有500多页关于乌克兰教育领域的知名和著名人物(法里安和阿夫拉缅科的官方页面)和鲜为人知的人物的资料被整理。在一般的科学方法中,分析、综合、归纳、演绎、观察被使用,特别不包括(官方页面的观察);描述性的。本研究的科学新颖之处在于,它是对当今社会广泛存在的教育网络话语进行研究的首次尝试。因此,教育网络话语不是纯粹的制度性话语,而是一种争论性的、信息性的、社会仪式性的制度性家庭中介型话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信