{"title":"The Idea of Customary Law Community Representation in the Regional Representative Council","authors":"I. E. Joesoef","doi":"10.15294/ulj.v5i2.26984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Customary Law Community (Masyarakat Hukum Adat, MHA) as part of the Customary Law System is recognized for its existence and its implementation in the National Land Law (Hukum Tanah Nasional, HTN). In the Explanation of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) it is stated that the function of Customary Law as the main source in the development of HTN, although such recognition is accompanied by conditions as long as in reality they still exist and in accordance with national and state interests. This paper analyses and examines the problems of MHA in the concept of regional representative council. The problem on this paper come up from various problems concerning to ulayat land and its conflict between indigenous people and government. The research emphasized that the main problem is the inequality of perception between the Executive, Judiciary and Legislative institutions in the consistency of compensation payments resulting in the re-claim of Tanah Ulayat (Adat), there is no basis for a multi-dimensional approach (anthropology, sociology and others besides the juridical approach). This means that the formal juridical approach alone does not achieve effective results. The question is whether the constitutional MHA can have representation in the Regional Representative Council (DPD) and what forms of democracy are appropriate and can channel the aspirations of the MHA.","PeriodicalId":30820,"journal":{"name":"Unnes Law Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"119-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unnes Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v5i2.26984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The Customary Law Community (Masyarakat Hukum Adat, MHA) as part of the Customary Law System is recognized for its existence and its implementation in the National Land Law (Hukum Tanah Nasional, HTN). In the Explanation of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) it is stated that the function of Customary Law as the main source in the development of HTN, although such recognition is accompanied by conditions as long as in reality they still exist and in accordance with national and state interests. This paper analyses and examines the problems of MHA in the concept of regional representative council. The problem on this paper come up from various problems concerning to ulayat land and its conflict between indigenous people and government. The research emphasized that the main problem is the inequality of perception between the Executive, Judiciary and Legislative institutions in the consistency of compensation payments resulting in the re-claim of Tanah Ulayat (Adat), there is no basis for a multi-dimensional approach (anthropology, sociology and others besides the juridical approach). This means that the formal juridical approach alone does not achieve effective results. The question is whether the constitutional MHA can have representation in the Regional Representative Council (DPD) and what forms of democracy are appropriate and can channel the aspirations of the MHA.
习惯法共同体(Masyarakat Hukum Adat,MHA)作为习惯法体系的一部分,因其存在及其在《国家土地法》(Hukum Tanah Nasional,HTN)中的实施而得到承认。在《土地基本法解释》(UUPA)中指出,习惯法的功能是HTN发展的主要来源,尽管这种承认伴随着条件,只要这些条件在现实中仍然存在,并且符合国家和国家利益。本文对区域代表理事会概念中的MHA问题进行了分析和探讨。本文的问题源于有关乌拉亚特土地的各种问题以及土著人民与政府之间的冲突。研究强调,主要问题是行政、司法和立法机构对赔偿金一致性的看法不平等,导致Tanah Ulayat(Adat)再次索赔,没有多维方法(人类学、社会学和除司法方法之外的其他方法)的基础。这意味着,仅靠正式的司法方法并不能取得有效的结果。问题是,符合宪法的MHA是否可以在地区代表委员会(DPD)中拥有代表权,以及什么形式的民主是合适的,可以引导MHA的愿望。