A Lost Opportunity? Collective Demands and Migrant Farmworkers in Costa Rica during the Pandemic

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Koen Voorend, Daniel Alvarado Abarca, Ronald Andrés Sáenz Leandro
{"title":"A Lost Opportunity? Collective Demands and Migrant Farmworkers in Costa Rica during the Pandemic","authors":"Koen Voorend, Daniel Alvarado Abarca, Ronald Andrés Sáenz Leandro","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v17i1.4034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic induced an overexposure of migrant farmworkers’ poor working and living conditions in Costa Rica’s northern border area and underscored the country’s dependence on migrant labor. This created a unique opportunity to position pro-migrant concerns and demand actions from the state. In this article, we assess if and to what extent the actions of the Costa Rican state were influenced by migrant demands, or whether other priorities guided policy. Based on a novel database on protest and collective action (Protestas-IIS) that is fed with national and local newspaper articles, we analyze the demands made by migrants, the private sector and NIMBY movements, and state responses. Our findings suggest that the latter prioritized market concerns and antiimmigrant interests, thereby underscoring lessons from the literature that migrants are among the politically most disenfranchised in society. Their demands were only partially responded to by the state, and only concerning issues that aligned directly with public concerns, in this case related to health.","PeriodicalId":44923,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v17i1.4034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic induced an overexposure of migrant farmworkers’ poor working and living conditions in Costa Rica’s northern border area and underscored the country’s dependence on migrant labor. This created a unique opportunity to position pro-migrant concerns and demand actions from the state. In this article, we assess if and to what extent the actions of the Costa Rican state were influenced by migrant demands, or whether other priorities guided policy. Based on a novel database on protest and collective action (Protestas-IIS) that is fed with national and local newspaper articles, we analyze the demands made by migrants, the private sector and NIMBY movements, and state responses. Our findings suggest that the latter prioritized market concerns and antiimmigrant interests, thereby underscoring lessons from the literature that migrants are among the politically most disenfranchised in society. Their demands were only partially responded to by the state, and only concerning issues that aligned directly with public concerns, in this case related to health.
失去的机会?疫情期间哥斯达黎加的集体需求和农民工
新冠肺炎大流行导致哥斯达黎加北部边境地区的农场移民工人的恶劣工作和生活条件过度暴露,并突显了该国对移民劳动力的依赖。这创造了一个独特的机会来定位支持移民的问题,并要求国家采取行动。在这篇文章中,我们评估了哥斯达黎加政府的行动是否以及在多大程度上受到移民需求的影响,或者其他优先事项是否指导了政策。基于一个新的抗议和集体行动数据库(抗议IIS),该数据库中有国家和地方报纸的文章,我们分析了移民、私营部门和NIMBY运动提出的要求,以及国家的反应。我们的研究结果表明,后者优先考虑市场问题和反移民利益,从而强调了文献中的教训,即移民是社会中政治上最被剥夺权利的群体之一。他们的要求只得到了国家的部分回应,而且只涉及与公众关切直接相关的问题,在这种情况下与健康有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Social Justice
Studies in Social Justice POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信