Determining an Appropriate To-Keep-Vein-Open (TKVO) Infusion Rate for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Usage

Q3 Medicine
B. Doyle, L. Kelsey, P. Carr, A. Bulmer, Samantha Keogh
{"title":"Determining an Appropriate To-Keep-Vein-Open (TKVO) Infusion Rate for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Usage","authors":"B. Doyle, L. Kelsey, P. Carr, A. Bulmer, Samantha Keogh","doi":"10.2309/java-d-21-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Background: Evidence to support an optimum continuous to-keep-vein-open (TKVO) infusion rate for peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is lacking. The aim of this study was to simulate typical TKVO rates, in combination with flushing, to better understand TKVO in relation to PIVC patency.\n Methods: We simulated saline infusion through a 20-gauge PIVC in 2 forearm veins (3.3 and 2.2 mm) using computational fluid dynamics under various venous flow rates (velocities 3.7–22.1 cm/s), with a saline flush rate of 1 mL/s and TKVO infusion rates of 10, 20, and 40 mL/h. We determined TKVO efficacy using the stream of saline clearing the stasis region at the device tip and the shear stress acting on the vein.\n Results: At 10 mL/h TKVO rate, blood stasis occurs around the PIVC tip as saline is pulled into the faster-moving venous blood flow, creating the blood recirculation (stasis) zone at the device tip. When TKVO increases >20 mL/h, this stasis diminishes, and the likelihood of patency increases. Shear stress on the vein is negligible during TKVO but increases 10- to 19-fold when flushing the small and large veins investigated here.\n Conclusions: Low TKVO rates (10 mL/h) may not clear the PIVC tip and keep the device patent. Based on our simulations, we propose a TKVO rate of at least 20 mL/h could be used in practice; however, 30–40 mL/h appears most effective across different venous flow rates and peripheral vein sizes. However, this additional fluid load must be carefully considered based on the needs of each patient.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-21-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Evidence to support an optimum continuous to-keep-vein-open (TKVO) infusion rate for peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is lacking. The aim of this study was to simulate typical TKVO rates, in combination with flushing, to better understand TKVO in relation to PIVC patency. Methods: We simulated saline infusion through a 20-gauge PIVC in 2 forearm veins (3.3 and 2.2 mm) using computational fluid dynamics under various venous flow rates (velocities 3.7–22.1 cm/s), with a saline flush rate of 1 mL/s and TKVO infusion rates of 10, 20, and 40 mL/h. We determined TKVO efficacy using the stream of saline clearing the stasis region at the device tip and the shear stress acting on the vein. Results: At 10 mL/h TKVO rate, blood stasis occurs around the PIVC tip as saline is pulled into the faster-moving venous blood flow, creating the blood recirculation (stasis) zone at the device tip. When TKVO increases >20 mL/h, this stasis diminishes, and the likelihood of patency increases. Shear stress on the vein is negligible during TKVO but increases 10- to 19-fold when flushing the small and large veins investigated here. Conclusions: Low TKVO rates (10 mL/h) may not clear the PIVC tip and keep the device patent. Based on our simulations, we propose a TKVO rate of at least 20 mL/h could be used in practice; however, 30–40 mL/h appears most effective across different venous flow rates and peripheral vein sizes. However, this additional fluid load must be carefully considered based on the needs of each patient.
确定适用于外周静脉导管的适当保持静脉开放(TKVO)输注率
背景:目前缺乏支持外周静脉导管(pivc)最佳持续保持静脉开放(TKVO)输注速率的证据。本研究的目的是模拟典型的TKVO率,并结合潮红,以更好地了解TKVO与PIVC通畅的关系。方法:采用计算流体动力学方法,在不同静脉流速(3.7 ~ 22.1 cm/s)下,模拟生理盐水冲洗速率为1 mL/s, TKVO输注速率为10、20和40 mL/h下,通过20号PIVC在2条前臂静脉(3.3和2.2 mm)中输注生理盐水。我们使用生理盐水清除装置尖端的停滞区和作用于静脉的剪切应力来确定TKVO的疗效。结果:在10 mL/h TKVO速率下,由于生理盐水被拉入快速移动的静脉血流中,PIVC尖端周围发生血瘀,在装置尖端形成血液再循环(停滞)区。当TKVO增加至20ml /h时,这种停滞消失,通畅的可能性增加。在TKVO期间,静脉上的剪切应力可以忽略不计,但在冲洗小静脉和大静脉时,剪切应力增加10至19倍。结论:低TKVO率(10 mL/h)可能无法清除PIVC尖端并保持设备的专利。根据我们的模拟,我们建议在实践中至少使用20ml /h的TKVO速率;然而,在不同的静脉流速和周围静脉大小中,30-40 mL/h似乎是最有效的。然而,这种额外的液体负荷必须根据每个病人的需要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信