Where is psychoanalysis today? Sixty-two psychoanalysts share their subjective perspectives on the state of the art of psychoanalysis: A qualitative thematic analysis

IF 0.9 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
A. Stefana, Barbara Celentani, Aleksandar Dimitrijević, P. Migone, C. Albasi
{"title":"Where is psychoanalysis today? Sixty-two psychoanalysts share their subjective perspectives on the state of the art of psychoanalysis: A qualitative thematic analysis","authors":"A. Stefana, Barbara Celentani, Aleksandar Dimitrijević, P. Migone, C. Albasi","doi":"10.1080/0803706X.2021.1991594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Today it is still necessary and useful to deal with the empirical foundations and cultural dimensions of a discipline such as psychoanalysis that has played a vital role in shaping the contemporary world, on both sociocultural and clinical levels. This study aimed to describe and summarize the perspectives of experienced psychoanalysts on important aspects of psychoanalysis today. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 62 psychoanalysts. The interview data were processed using a theory-informed thematic analysis. There were 12 macro-themes: important aspects of psychoanalysis, important authors in psychoanalysis today, “contemporary psychoanalysis,” the proliferation of psychoanalytic “schools,” psychoanalytic identity and psychotherapy, psychoanalytic training, the Oedipus complex, dreams, the relationship between psychoanalytic theory and outcome and process research, the relationship between psychoanalysis and research in the neurosciences, empirically validated psychoanalytic concepts, and the marginalization of psychoanalysis. Our study revealed the image of a pluralistic psychoanalysis that the participants interviewed show they have, with various schools/definitions/sources, where Freud and the classical model are contested by numerous other approaches.","PeriodicalId":43212,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2021.1991594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Today it is still necessary and useful to deal with the empirical foundations and cultural dimensions of a discipline such as psychoanalysis that has played a vital role in shaping the contemporary world, on both sociocultural and clinical levels. This study aimed to describe and summarize the perspectives of experienced psychoanalysts on important aspects of psychoanalysis today. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 62 psychoanalysts. The interview data were processed using a theory-informed thematic analysis. There were 12 macro-themes: important aspects of psychoanalysis, important authors in psychoanalysis today, “contemporary psychoanalysis,” the proliferation of psychoanalytic “schools,” psychoanalytic identity and psychotherapy, psychoanalytic training, the Oedipus complex, dreams, the relationship between psychoanalytic theory and outcome and process research, the relationship between psychoanalysis and research in the neurosciences, empirically validated psychoanalytic concepts, and the marginalization of psychoanalysis. Our study revealed the image of a pluralistic psychoanalysis that the participants interviewed show they have, with various schools/definitions/sources, where Freud and the classical model are contested by numerous other approaches.
今天的精神分析学在哪里?62位精神分析学家分享了他们对精神分析艺术现状的主观看法:定性主题分析
今天,处理像精神分析这样的学科的经验基础和文化维度仍然是必要和有用的,精神分析在塑造当代世界方面,在社会文化和临床层面上都发挥了至关重要的作用。本研究旨在描述和总结经验丰富的精神分析学家对当今精神分析重要方面的看法。对62名精神分析学家进行了半结构化访谈。访谈数据采用基于理论的专题分析进行处理。共有12个宏观主题:精神分析的重要方面,当今精神分析的重要作者,“当代精神分析”,精神分析“学派”的激增,精神分析认同与心理治疗、精神分析训练、俄狄浦斯情结、梦、精神分析理论与结果和过程研究之间的关系、精神分析与神经科学研究之间的关系、经验验证的精神分析概念以及精神分析的边缘化。我们的研究揭示了多元精神分析的形象,受访的参与者展示了他们拥有的各种学派/定义/来源,弗洛伊德和经典模型受到许多其他方法的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Forum of Psychoanalysis
International Forum of Psychoanalysis PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信