{"title":"Book Review: Sven Hanuschek: Arno Schmidt: Biografie","authors":"M. Minden","doi":"10.1177/00472441231170054d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"assessment of Mann’s methodology, which proves him to be less knowledgeable about the matters he discusses than he would appear to be. The average person finds the narrator ‘almost intimidatingly cultivated’ (p. 138), but this is merely a trap that Mann set for an easily browbeaten public. Watroba has little time for Hermann Kurzke’s eloquent if somewhat obscure characterisation of Mann’s ideal reader as ‘ein Bildungsbürger auf Abwegen, der sich nicht mehr mit den Interessen seiner Klasse identifiziert, aber auch keine andere Heimat findet’ (a cultivated bourgeois gone astray who no longer identifies with the interests of his class but has not found another home‘, cited p. 23). She sees things differently: ‘this self-indulgent spectacle of intellectual and cultural superiority ultimately draws so much attention to itself that The Magic Mountain ends up laying bare its own pretence’ (p. 139). Nowhere is this more obvious than in Castorp’s use of French, in which he displays greater fluency than Mann ever attained. The same applies to the prolonged, exceedingly wearying debates. Untutored readers are more likely to recognise their carefully staged artificiality than most scholars are willing to. Aware of the unequal distribution of cultural capital, Watroba reaches the sobering verdict that the novel is ‘all about feeling consigned to intellectual inferiority and passivity, and nevertheless trying to become intellectually independent and active, albeit with varying results’ (p. 154). A spark of hope may yet flicker on within the crepuscular world of the Berghof.","PeriodicalId":43875,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES","volume":"53 1","pages":"205 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441231170054d","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
assessment of Mann’s methodology, which proves him to be less knowledgeable about the matters he discusses than he would appear to be. The average person finds the narrator ‘almost intimidatingly cultivated’ (p. 138), but this is merely a trap that Mann set for an easily browbeaten public. Watroba has little time for Hermann Kurzke’s eloquent if somewhat obscure characterisation of Mann’s ideal reader as ‘ein Bildungsbürger auf Abwegen, der sich nicht mehr mit den Interessen seiner Klasse identifiziert, aber auch keine andere Heimat findet’ (a cultivated bourgeois gone astray who no longer identifies with the interests of his class but has not found another home‘, cited p. 23). She sees things differently: ‘this self-indulgent spectacle of intellectual and cultural superiority ultimately draws so much attention to itself that The Magic Mountain ends up laying bare its own pretence’ (p. 139). Nowhere is this more obvious than in Castorp’s use of French, in which he displays greater fluency than Mann ever attained. The same applies to the prolonged, exceedingly wearying debates. Untutored readers are more likely to recognise their carefully staged artificiality than most scholars are willing to. Aware of the unequal distribution of cultural capital, Watroba reaches the sobering verdict that the novel is ‘all about feeling consigned to intellectual inferiority and passivity, and nevertheless trying to become intellectually independent and active, albeit with varying results’ (p. 154). A spark of hope may yet flicker on within the crepuscular world of the Berghof.
对曼恩方法论的评估,这证明他对所讨论的问题的了解不如他看起来的那么多。普通人发现叙述者“几乎受到了令人生畏的培养”(第138页),但这只是曼恩为一个容易受到恐吓的公众设下的陷阱。Watroba几乎没有时间听Hermann Kurzke对Mann的理想读者进行雄辩但有些晦涩的描述,称其为“在Bildungsbürger auf Abwegen,而不是在Interessen seiner Klasse identifieert,aber auch keine andere Heimat findet“(一个误入歧途的有教养的资产阶级,他不再认同自己阶级的利益,但没有找到另一个家”,引用第23页)。她对事情的看法不同:“这种自我放纵的智力和文化优越感最终引起了人们对自己的关注,以至于《魔法山》最终暴露了自己的伪装”(第139页)。这一点在卡斯托尔普对法语的使用中最为明显,在法语中,他表现出了比曼更流利的语言。同样的道理也适用于旷日持久、令人疲惫不堪的辩论。与大多数学者相比,未受过教育的读者更有可能认识到他们精心策划的人为行为。意识到文化资本的不平等分配,Watroba得出了一个发人深省的结论,即这部小说“完全是关于感觉被赋予了智识上的自卑和被动,尽管如此,尽管结果各不相同”(第154页)。希望的火花可能会在Berghof黄昏的世界里闪烁。
期刊介绍:
Journal of European Studies is firmly established as one of the leading interdisciplinary humanities and cultural studies journals in universities and other academic institutions. From time to time, individual issue concentrate on particular themes. Review essays and review notices also offer a wide and informed coverage of many books that are published on European cultural themes.