"Waiting for Gabriel": A Review of Epiphany, a One-Act play by Brian Watkins, the American Premiere at the Mitzi E. Newhouse Theater, Lincoln Center, New York, 26 May-24 July 2022
{"title":"\"Waiting for Gabriel\": A Review of Epiphany, a One-Act play by Brian Watkins, the American Premiere at the Mitzi E. Newhouse Theater, Lincoln Center, New York, 26 May-24 July 2022","authors":"R. Gerber","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2022.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Samuel Beckett might have been pleased. But Joyce . . . well, not so much. Like Godot in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, Gabriel Conroy is a no-show in Brian Watkins’s one-act play Epiphany, a riff on Joyce’s short story “The Dead,” which had its American premiere at Lincoln Center in New York this past summer. The world premiere was presented by the Druid Theatre Company of Galway, Ireland, back in 2019. As long as Gabriel was not appearing, however, the producers might have spared American audiences this play, as well as the trip across the Atlantic. While Gabriel’s non-appearance is one of several clever and intriguing ideas in the play, it is not the only thing missing from this re-visioning of “The Dead.” There is no mention of Joyce’s story in the publicity or the playbill for Epiphany. And, while the acting is generally adequate, aside from the AWOL Gabriel and a tepid Freddy Malins, none of the characters in this play carry the names, recite the lines, nor retain other attributes of the figures we are all so familiar with in “The Dead.” Aunt Kate, for instance, is renamed just “Morkan,” and she is the central figure here. None of this matters since audiences are blissfully unaware of Epiphany’s connections with “The Dead” anyway; Joyce would probably have been happy with that. The dialogue that has been substituted in this play for his elegiac language can only, ironically, be described in one word: deadly. Most of the conversation in Epiphany consists of solipsistic philosophizing, sophomoric psychologizing, and handwringing blather, especially by Morkan. That all said, it is relevant to recall that “The Dead” has served as inspiration for multiple reputable versions, ranging from a movie to a musical, and even an opera and more. Each of these has had its strong points and points that were less strong. So a brief account of some of the more interesting aspects of Epiphany that are related to “The Dead”—not the story line itself, really, nor the dialogue—might best serve readers of this review. The almost-in-the-round Mitzi E. Newhouse Theater affords the entire audience an opportunity easily to view all the actors as they make their way in and out and around the stage. Many of the characters’ lines are spoken simultaneously, however, so, while they can always be seen, they cannot always be heard over one another. The set","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Samuel Beckett might have been pleased. But Joyce . . . well, not so much. Like Godot in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, Gabriel Conroy is a no-show in Brian Watkins’s one-act play Epiphany, a riff on Joyce’s short story “The Dead,” which had its American premiere at Lincoln Center in New York this past summer. The world premiere was presented by the Druid Theatre Company of Galway, Ireland, back in 2019. As long as Gabriel was not appearing, however, the producers might have spared American audiences this play, as well as the trip across the Atlantic. While Gabriel’s non-appearance is one of several clever and intriguing ideas in the play, it is not the only thing missing from this re-visioning of “The Dead.” There is no mention of Joyce’s story in the publicity or the playbill for Epiphany. And, while the acting is generally adequate, aside from the AWOL Gabriel and a tepid Freddy Malins, none of the characters in this play carry the names, recite the lines, nor retain other attributes of the figures we are all so familiar with in “The Dead.” Aunt Kate, for instance, is renamed just “Morkan,” and she is the central figure here. None of this matters since audiences are blissfully unaware of Epiphany’s connections with “The Dead” anyway; Joyce would probably have been happy with that. The dialogue that has been substituted in this play for his elegiac language can only, ironically, be described in one word: deadly. Most of the conversation in Epiphany consists of solipsistic philosophizing, sophomoric psychologizing, and handwringing blather, especially by Morkan. That all said, it is relevant to recall that “The Dead” has served as inspiration for multiple reputable versions, ranging from a movie to a musical, and even an opera and more. Each of these has had its strong points and points that were less strong. So a brief account of some of the more interesting aspects of Epiphany that are related to “The Dead”—not the story line itself, really, nor the dialogue—might best serve readers of this review. The almost-in-the-round Mitzi E. Newhouse Theater affords the entire audience an opportunity easily to view all the actors as they make their way in and out and around the stage. Many of the characters’ lines are spoken simultaneously, however, so, while they can always be seen, they cannot always be heard over one another. The set
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.