Assessment method of urban domestic sewage treatment plant-network integration based on current drainage management

IF 1.6 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL

Water International Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/02508060.2023.2204614

Yingxin Guo, Y. Liang, Haoyan Liu, H. Xu, Chenchen Zhao

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The main hindrance to implementation of domestic sewage treatment plant-network integration in China is the separated assessment method. The assessment method of plant-network integration links payment for sewage treatment to incoming pollutants, and payment for maintenance of the pipe network to the concentration of pollutants in incoming water. It helps establish an interactive link between the city and district, and motivates operation and management stakeholder groups. The method contains index system formulation, target value determination, assessment payment plan specification and city-district payment proportion clarification. It provides a solution for the current drainage management by promoting plant-network integration.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于当前排水管理的城市生活污水处理厂-管网一体化评价方法

在中国，污水处理厂-管网一体化实施的主要障碍是分离的评估方法。厂网一体化评价方法将污水处理费用与来水污染物挂钩，将管网维护费用与来水污染物浓度挂钩。它有助于建立城市和地区之间的互动联系，并激励经营和管理利益相关者群体。该方法包括指标体系的制定、目标值的确定、考核支付方案的规范和市区支付比例的厘清。它通过促进厂网一体化，为当前的排水管理提供了一个解决方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Water International 工程技术-工程：土木

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

7.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Water International is the official journal of the International Water Resources Association (IWRA), founded in 1972 to serve as an international gateway to the people, ideas and networks that are critical to the sustainable management of water resources around the world. Water International''s articles, state-of-the-art reviews, technical notes and other matter are policy-relevant and aimed at communicating in-depth knowledge to a multidisciplinary and international community. Water International publishes both individual contributions and thematic special issues and sections on cutting edge issues. All individual manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal and peer review by the Deputy Editor in Chief and the Associate Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by at least one independent, anonymous expert referee. All external peer review is double blind. Thematic issues and sections are handled under comparable procedures by guest editors under the oversight of the Editor in Chief.