Pupillary Responses to Pseudowords With Different Morphological and Imageability Features

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Miguel Lázaro, Ana García-Gutiérrez, Lorena García, J. Hinojosa
{"title":"Pupillary Responses to Pseudowords With Different Morphological and Imageability Features","authors":"Miguel Lázaro, Ana García-Gutiérrez, Lorena García, J. Hinojosa","doi":"10.1027/0269-8803/a000323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In this study, we explored the role of morphology and imageability in pseudoword processing while recording pupillary responses in a lexical decision task that included polymorphemic (“footbalist”), suffixed (“smopify”), and simple pseudowords (“gresmor”), which also varied in imageability. The behavioral results of the mixed-model analyses showed longer latencies and higher error rates for highly imageable polymorphemic pseudowords relative to suffixed pseudowords. Suffixed pseudowords also generated longer latencies than simple pseudowords. The effect of imageability reached significance in these comparisons. With respect to the physiological data, significant differences emerged in the peak latencies between polymorphemic and the other two types of pseudowords, simple and suffixed. Overall findings were interpreted to index processing costs associated with the inhibition of word-like responses in morphological pseudowords while highlighting the intrinsic relationship between morphological and semantic processing. Physiological results allow us to associate for the first-time changes in the pupils to pseudowords processing.","PeriodicalId":50075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, we explored the role of morphology and imageability in pseudoword processing while recording pupillary responses in a lexical decision task that included polymorphemic (“footbalist”), suffixed (“smopify”), and simple pseudowords (“gresmor”), which also varied in imageability. The behavioral results of the mixed-model analyses showed longer latencies and higher error rates for highly imageable polymorphemic pseudowords relative to suffixed pseudowords. Suffixed pseudowords also generated longer latencies than simple pseudowords. The effect of imageability reached significance in these comparisons. With respect to the physiological data, significant differences emerged in the peak latencies between polymorphemic and the other two types of pseudowords, simple and suffixed. Overall findings were interpreted to index processing costs associated with the inhibition of word-like responses in morphological pseudowords while highlighting the intrinsic relationship between morphological and semantic processing. Physiological results allow us to associate for the first-time changes in the pupils to pseudowords processing.
瞳孔对不同形态和可想像性假词的反应
摘要:在这项研究中,我们通过记录瞳孔在词汇决策任务中的反应,探讨了形态学和可想象性在假词处理中的作用,这些任务包括多态假词(“footbalist”)、后缀假词(“smopify”)和简单假词(“gresmor”),这些假词的可想象性也各不相同。混合模型分析的行为结果表明,相对于带后缀的假词,高度可想象的多态假词的潜伏期更长,错误率更高。带后缀的假词也比简单的假词产生更长的延迟。在这些比较中,可想象性的影响达到了显著的程度。在生理数据方面,多态假词与其他两类假词(简单假词和后缀假词)的峰值潜伏期存在显著差异。整体研究结果被解释为在强调形态和语义加工之间的内在关系的同时,索引加工成本与词性假词类词反应的抑制相关。生理上的结果让我们第一次将瞳孔的变化与假词处理联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychophysiology
Journal of Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychophysiology is an international periodical that presents original research in all fields employing psychophysiological measures on human subjects. Contributions are published from psychology, physiology, clinical psychology, psychiatry, neurosciences, and pharmacology. Communications on new psychophysiological methods are presented as well. Space is also allocated for letters to the editor and book reviews. Occasional special issues are devoted to important current issues in psychophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信