Wie verdient nog onze solidariteit? : Veranderingen in solidariteitsgevoelens met ouderen, zieken en gehandicapten, werklozen en immigranten in de 21ste eeuw

Q4 Social Sciences
F. Roosma
{"title":"Wie verdient nog onze solidariteit? : Veranderingen in solidariteitsgevoelens met ouderen, zieken en gehandicapten, werklozen en immigranten in de 21ste eeuw","authors":"F. Roosma","doi":"10.5117/mem2019.4.006.roos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Netherlands has changed in many ways over the past two decades: Duties have become more central in the ‘participation society’, there are fierce debates about the arrival of immigrants, and the aging society and the economic crisis are sharpening\n debate about redistribution and social provisions. How have the feelings of solidarity of Dutch citizens developed in this changing context? We know from previous studies that, in general, people feel most involved with the elderly and the sick and disabled, and are less concerned about the\n standards of living of the unemployed and immigrants. This ‘ranking’ in feelings of solidarity with target groups of social policy is explained by deservingness theory and is suggested to be invariable over time. But is that indeed the case? In this article, changes in solidarity\n views of Dutch citizens with regard to different target groups of social policy are analysed, using data from three waves of the European Values Study (1999/2008/2017) and taking into account individual background characteristics and cohort effects. Results show an invariable deservingness\n ranking and relatively stable feelings of solidarity. Solidarity with the elderly and the sick and disabled seems to be mostly depending on cohort effects: People from younger cohorts feel much less concerned with the living conditions of the elderly. Solidarity with immigrants instead, is\n largely determined by people’s political preference and education, while solidarity with the unemployed appears to be dependent on both individual characteristics and cohort effects. These effects do not get stronger (or weaker) over time. Despite the stability in feelings of solidarity\n the past decades, the strong cohort effects might predict change in the deservingness ranking in the future.","PeriodicalId":35265,"journal":{"name":"Mens en Maatschappij","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mens en Maatschappij","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/mem2019.4.006.roos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The Netherlands has changed in many ways over the past two decades: Duties have become more central in the ‘participation society’, there are fierce debates about the arrival of immigrants, and the aging society and the economic crisis are sharpening debate about redistribution and social provisions. How have the feelings of solidarity of Dutch citizens developed in this changing context? We know from previous studies that, in general, people feel most involved with the elderly and the sick and disabled, and are less concerned about the standards of living of the unemployed and immigrants. This ‘ranking’ in feelings of solidarity with target groups of social policy is explained by deservingness theory and is suggested to be invariable over time. But is that indeed the case? In this article, changes in solidarity views of Dutch citizens with regard to different target groups of social policy are analysed, using data from three waves of the European Values Study (1999/2008/2017) and taking into account individual background characteristics and cohort effects. Results show an invariable deservingness ranking and relatively stable feelings of solidarity. Solidarity with the elderly and the sick and disabled seems to be mostly depending on cohort effects: People from younger cohorts feel much less concerned with the living conditions of the elderly. Solidarity with immigrants instead, is largely determined by people’s political preference and education, while solidarity with the unemployed appears to be dependent on both individual characteristics and cohort effects. These effects do not get stronger (or weaker) over time. Despite the stability in feelings of solidarity the past decades, the strong cohort effects might predict change in the deservingness ranking in the future.
谁值得我们的声援?:21世纪声援老年人、病人和残疾人、失业者和移民的变化
摘要在过去的二十年里,荷兰在许多方面发生了变化:义务在“参与社会”中变得更加重要,关于移民的到来有着激烈的争论,老龄化社会和经济危机正在加剧关于再分配和社会保障的争论。荷兰公民的团结感情是如何在这种不断变化的背景下发展起来的?我们从以前的研究中知道,一般来说,人们最关心老年人、病人和残疾人,而不太关心失业者和移民的生活水平。这种与社会政策目标群体团结一致的“排名”是由应得理论解释的,并被认为随着时间的推移是不变的。但事实确实如此吗?本文利用三波欧洲价值观研究(1999/2008/2017)的数据,并考虑到个人背景特征和群体效应,分析了荷兰公民对不同社会政策目标群体的团结观点的变化。结果显示出一个不变的值得尊敬的排名和相对稳定的团结感。与老年人、病人和残疾人的团结似乎主要取决于群体效应:年轻群体的人对老年人的生活条件不太关心。相反,与移民的团结在很大程度上取决于人们的政治偏好和教育,而与失业者的团结似乎取决于个人特征和群体效应。这些影响不会随着时间的推移而变得更强(或更弱)。尽管在过去的几十年里,团结的感觉是稳定的,但强烈的群体效应可能预示着未来值得尊敬的排名会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mens en Maatschappij
Mens en Maatschappij Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Mens en Maatschappij is een Nederlandstalig tijdschrift voor sociale wetenschappen. Het biedt het beste en breedste begrip van de actuele ontwikkelingen binnen de sociale wetenschappen en sociologie. De redactie selecteert artikelen op wetenschappelijke kwaliteit en actualiteit. Alle artikelen worden onderworpen aan een peer-reviewproces. Het tijdschrift is geen spreekbuis van een bepaalde richting of stroming, maar staat open voor elke bijdrage op wetenschappelijk niveau. Naast de reguliere nummers verschijnt ieder jaar een themanummer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信