The End of 2022

Q2 Social Sciences
R. Sen
{"title":"The End of 2022","authors":"R. Sen","doi":"10.1080/09503153.2022.2130523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the core aims of the journal is to encourage those new to academic publishing to submit their work to it. It is therefore fitting that in the current issue four of the five research articles are first authored by authors new to academic publishing who are either currently in social work practice or, in one case, was very recently so. We begin with Andrew Davies’ literature review on the highly challenging topic of mothers who kill their children. Davies’ motivation to study this topic in detail was spurred by a tragic case which occurred within the local authority area where he worked. The literature review explores the different categories of maternal filicide while noting the underlying complexities and uniqueness of each situation where a child is killed by their mother. The review reports that maternal filicide is rare and when it does occur is likely to be caused by a combination of societal, psychological and relationship-based factors such that it cannot be easily predicted. The article concludes by arguing for greater awareness of, and research into, this phenomenon while emphasising the need for better preventative supports in work with families. Our second paper is written by Debbie MacAulay and Susan Levy. MacAulay is now a qualified social worker practising with adults but the article draws on her placement experience during the Covid-19 pandemic to provide insights on how she used arts-based approaches to connect with young people online. Amongst the interesting reflections are that at the start of her placement MacAulay saw the use of creative arts as a weakness in her practice, having not enjoyed how they were taught to her at school. However, on placement she came to view arts-based methods as an essential communicative tool with young people. Drawing on examples, she illustrates how the methods supported her to build relationships in placement. Underlying the description of work is a sense of how MacAulay’s use of arts-based methods allowed young people to direct parts of the interactions with her, generating more reciprocal and even communicative exchanges.","PeriodicalId":35184,"journal":{"name":"Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2022.2130523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the core aims of the journal is to encourage those new to academic publishing to submit their work to it. It is therefore fitting that in the current issue four of the five research articles are first authored by authors new to academic publishing who are either currently in social work practice or, in one case, was very recently so. We begin with Andrew Davies’ literature review on the highly challenging topic of mothers who kill their children. Davies’ motivation to study this topic in detail was spurred by a tragic case which occurred within the local authority area where he worked. The literature review explores the different categories of maternal filicide while noting the underlying complexities and uniqueness of each situation where a child is killed by their mother. The review reports that maternal filicide is rare and when it does occur is likely to be caused by a combination of societal, psychological and relationship-based factors such that it cannot be easily predicted. The article concludes by arguing for greater awareness of, and research into, this phenomenon while emphasising the need for better preventative supports in work with families. Our second paper is written by Debbie MacAulay and Susan Levy. MacAulay is now a qualified social worker practising with adults but the article draws on her placement experience during the Covid-19 pandemic to provide insights on how she used arts-based approaches to connect with young people online. Amongst the interesting reflections are that at the start of her placement MacAulay saw the use of creative arts as a weakness in her practice, having not enjoyed how they were taught to her at school. However, on placement she came to view arts-based methods as an essential communicative tool with young people. Drawing on examples, she illustrates how the methods supported her to build relationships in placement. Underlying the description of work is a sense of how MacAulay’s use of arts-based methods allowed young people to direct parts of the interactions with her, generating more reciprocal and even communicative exchanges.
2022年底
该杂志的核心目标之一是鼓励那些刚开始从事学术出版的人向其提交他们的作品。因此,在本期的五篇研究文章中,有四篇是由刚开始从事社会工作的作者首次撰写的,他们要么目前正在从事社会工作,要么最近才从事社会工作。我们从Andrew Davies关于杀害孩子的母亲这一极具挑战性的话题的文献综述开始。戴维斯详细研究这个话题的动机是因为他工作的地方当局发生了一起悲剧。这篇文献综述探讨了母亲杀害子女的不同类别,同时指出了儿童被母亲杀害的每种情况的潜在复杂性和独特性。该评论报告称,杀害母亲的行为很罕见,当它真的发生时,很可能是由社会、心理和基于关系的因素共同造成的,因此无法轻易预测。文章最后主张提高对这一现象的认识和研究,同时强调在与家庭合作时需要更好的预防性支持。我们的第二篇论文由Debbie MacAulay和Susan Levy撰写。MacAulay现在是一名合格的成年人社会工作者,但这篇文章借鉴了她在新冠肺炎大流行期间的安置经验,深入了解了她如何使用基于艺术的方法在网上与年轻人建立联系。有趣的反思之一是,在她开始实习时,MacAulay认为使用创意艺术是她实践中的一个弱点,因为她不喜欢学校里教她的方式。然而,在安置时,她开始将基于艺术的方法视为与年轻人交流的重要工具。她举例说明了这些方法如何支持她在安置中建立关系。对作品的描述背后是一种感觉,即MacAulay对艺术方法的使用使年轻人能够直接与她进行部分互动,从而产生更多的互惠甚至交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practice
Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信