Sex Differences in Adolescent Bullying Behaviours

IF 3.6 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Psychosocial Intervention Pub Date : 2021-02-11 DOI:10.5093/PI2021A1

Sandra Feijóo, James O’Higgins‐Norman, Mairéad Foody, Rafael Pichel, Teresa Braña, Jesús A. Varela, Antonio Rial

{"title":"Sex Differences in Adolescent Bullying Behaviours","authors":"Sandra Feijóo, James O’Higgins‐Norman, Mairéad Foody, Rafael Pichel, Teresa Braña, Jesús A. Varela, Antonio Rial","doi":"10.5093/PI2021A1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades there has been a progressive increase in concern and research into the problems of peer aggression, both in the educational setting and more recently, online. The present study sought to explore sex differences in traditional bullying and cyberbullying, since current literature has not reached a consensus in how bullying involvement could be moderated by sex. The sample consisted of 3,174 adolescents aged 12-17 years old who completed a paper survey which included the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire and the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. The main results found no differences in cyberbullying rates for boys and girls. In the case of bullying, there were more bully-victims among the boys, but no differences were found in the pure victims or pure perpetrators. When analysing the specific bullying behaviours suffered or perpetrated, several differences were found. However, said differences were discrete and it seems that there are not distinctly differentiated bullying patterns, which discourages the use of clearly differentiated preventive strategies for boys and girls.","PeriodicalId":51641,"journal":{"name":"Psychosocial Intervention","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosocial Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/PI2021A1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

Abstract

In recent decades there has been a progressive increase in concern and research into the problems of peer aggression, both in the educational setting and more recently, online. The present study sought to explore sex differences in traditional bullying and cyberbullying, since current literature has not reached a consensus in how bullying involvement could be moderated by sex. The sample consisted of 3,174 adolescents aged 12-17 years old who completed a paper survey which included the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire and the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. The main results found no differences in cyberbullying rates for boys and girls. In the case of bullying, there were more bully-victims among the boys, but no differences were found in the pure victims or pure perpetrators. When analysing the specific bullying behaviours suffered or perpetrated, several differences were found. However, said differences were discrete and it seems that there are not distinctly differentiated bullying patterns, which discourages the use of clearly differentiated preventive strategies for boys and girls.

查看原文本刊更多论文

青少年欺凌行为的性别差异

近几十年来，无论是在教育环境中，还是最近在网上，对同伴攻击问题的关注和研究都在逐渐增加。本研究试图探索传统欺凌和网络欺凌中的性别差异，因为目前的文献尚未就性别如何调节欺凌行为达成共识。样本包括3174名12-17岁的青少年，他们完成了一项论文调查，其中包括欧洲欺凌干预项目问卷和欧洲网络欺凌干预项目调查问卷。主要结果发现，男孩和女孩的网络欺凌率没有差异。在欺凌案件中，男孩中的欺凌受害者更多，但在纯粹的受害者和纯粹的施暴者中没有发现差异。在分析遭受或实施的具体欺凌行为时，发现了一些差异。然而，上述差异是离散的，似乎没有明显区别的欺凌模式，这阻碍了对男孩和女孩使用明显区别的预防策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychosocial Intervention PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

8.30%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Psychosocial Intervention is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes papers in all areas relevant to psychosocial intervention at the individual, family, social networks, organization, community, and population levels. The Journal emphasizes an evidence-based perspective and welcomes papers reporting original basic and applied research, program evaluation, and intervention results. The journal will also feature integrative reviews, and specialized papers on theoretical advances and methodological issues. Psychosocial Intervention is committed to advance knowledge, and to provide scientific evidence informing psychosocial interventions tackling social and community problems, and promoting social welfare and quality of life. Psychosocial Intervention welcomes contributions from all areas of psychology and allied disciplines, such as sociology, social work, social epidemiology, and public health. Psychosocial Intervention aims to be international in scope, and will publish papers both in Spanish and English.