Emit now, mitigate later? Earth system reversibility under overshoots of different magnitudes and durations

J. Schwinger, A. Asaadi, N. Steinert, Hanna Lee
{"title":"Emit now, mitigate later? Earth system reversibility under overshoots of different magnitudes and durations","authors":"J. Schwinger, A. Asaadi, N. Steinert, Hanna Lee","doi":"10.5194/esd-13-1641-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions cause irreversible climate change\non centennial to millennial timescales, yet current mitigation efforts are\ninsufficient to limit global warming to a level that is considered safe.\nCarbon dioxide removal (CDR) has been suggested as an option to partially\nreverse climate change and to return the Earth system to a less dangerous\nstate after a period of temperature overshoot. Whether or to what extent\nsuch partial reversal of climate change under CDR would happen is, next to\nsocio-economic feasibility and sustainability, key to assessing CDR as a\nmitigation option. Here, we use a state-of-the-art Earth system model that\nincludes a representation of permafrost carbon to investigate the\nreversibility of the Earth system after overshoots of different durations and\nmagnitudes in idealized simulations. We find that atmospheric CO2\nconcentrations are slightly lower after an overshoot, compared to a\nreference simulation without overshoot, due to a near-perfect compensation\nof carbon losses from land by increased ocean carbon uptake during the\novershoot periods. The legacy of an overshoot is, on a centennial timescale, indiscernible (within natural variability) from a reference case\nwithout overshoot for many aspects of the Earth system including global\naverage surface temperature, marine and terrestrial productivity, strength\nof the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, surface ocean pH,\nsurface O2 concentration, and permafrost extent, except in the most extreme overshoot scenario considered in this study. Consistent with\nprevious studies, we find irreversibility in permafrost carbon and deep\nocean properties like seawater temperature, pH, and O2 concentrations. We do not find any indication of tipping points or self-reinforcing feedbacks that would put the Earth system on a significantly different trajectory after an overshoot. Hence, the effectiveness of CDR in partially reversing large-scale patterns of climate change might not be the main issue of CDR but rather the impacts and risks that would occur during the period of elevated temperatures during the overshoot.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1641-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions cause irreversible climate change on centennial to millennial timescales, yet current mitigation efforts are insufficient to limit global warming to a level that is considered safe. Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) has been suggested as an option to partially reverse climate change and to return the Earth system to a less dangerous state after a period of temperature overshoot. Whether or to what extent such partial reversal of climate change under CDR would happen is, next to socio-economic feasibility and sustainability, key to assessing CDR as a mitigation option. Here, we use a state-of-the-art Earth system model that includes a representation of permafrost carbon to investigate the reversibility of the Earth system after overshoots of different durations and magnitudes in idealized simulations. We find that atmospheric CO2 concentrations are slightly lower after an overshoot, compared to a reference simulation without overshoot, due to a near-perfect compensation of carbon losses from land by increased ocean carbon uptake during the overshoot periods. The legacy of an overshoot is, on a centennial timescale, indiscernible (within natural variability) from a reference case without overshoot for many aspects of the Earth system including global average surface temperature, marine and terrestrial productivity, strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, surface ocean pH, surface O2 concentration, and permafrost extent, except in the most extreme overshoot scenario considered in this study. Consistent with previous studies, we find irreversibility in permafrost carbon and deep ocean properties like seawater temperature, pH, and O2 concentrations. We do not find any indication of tipping points or self-reinforcing feedbacks that would put the Earth system on a significantly different trajectory after an overshoot. Hence, the effectiveness of CDR in partially reversing large-scale patterns of climate change might not be the main issue of CDR but rather the impacts and risks that would occur during the period of elevated temperatures during the overshoot.
先排放,后缓解?地球系统在不同幅度和持续时间下的可逆性
摘要人为的二氧化碳排放在百年至千年的时间尺度上造成不可逆转的气候变化,但目前的减缓努力不足以将全球变暖限制在被认为是安全的水平。二氧化碳去除(CDR)被认为是部分逆转气候变化的一种选择,并在一段时间的温度超调后将地球系统恢复到一个不那么危险的状态。除了社会经济可行性和可持续性之外,在CDR下气候变化的部分逆转是否会发生或在多大程度上发生,是评估CDR作为缓解方案的关键。在这里,我们使用最先进的地球系统模型,其中包括永久冻土碳的表示,以研究在理想化模拟中不同持续时间和幅度的超调后地球系统的可逆性。我们发现,与没有超调的参考模拟相比,大气二氧化碳浓度在超调后略低,这是由于在超调期间,海洋碳吸收的增加对陆地碳损失的近乎完美的补偿。在百年时间尺度上,超调的遗留问题(在自然变率范围内)与没有超调的地球系统的许多方面的参考情况是无法区分的,包括全球平均表面温度、海洋和陆地生产力、大西洋经向翻转环流的强度、海洋表面pH值、表面O2浓度和永久冻土范围,除了本研究中考虑的最极端的超调情景。与之前的研究一致,我们发现永冻土碳和深海特性(如海水温度、pH值和O2浓度)的不可逆性。我们没有发现任何迹象表明临界点或自我强化的反馈会在超调后将地球系统置于一个明显不同的轨道上。因此,CDR在部分逆转大规模气候变化模式方面的有效性可能不是CDR的主要问题,而是在超调期间气温升高期间可能发生的影响和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信