Response of nematode community structure to different restoration practices in two vineyard soils in Tuscany (Italy)

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
S. Landi, G. Valboa, N. Vignozzi, G. d’Errico, S. Pellegrini, S. Simoncini, G. Torrini, P. Roversi, S. Priori
{"title":"Response of nematode community structure to different restoration practices in two vineyard soils in Tuscany (Italy)","authors":"S. Landi, G. Valboa, N. Vignozzi, G. d’Errico, S. Pellegrini, S. Simoncini, G. Torrini, P. Roversi, S. Priori","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2023.2179940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Inappropriate land preparation before vineyard establishment can lead to soil degradation and vine health issues, with consequent reductions in the quantity and quality of the grapes. In the present short-term trial, the effects of dry mulching, green manure and compost treatments were evaluated as restoration strategies to enhance soil functionality in degraded vineyard areas at two Tuscan farms that had been under organic management for different lengths of time. Soil nematode community, soil physical and chemical properties were monitored as indicators of soil quality. The restoration treatments scarcely affected soil chemical or physical qualities; only the compost application increased soil total organic carbon (TOC). Bacterial feeder nematodes increased under dry mulching in response to the organic carbon inputs on the farm in conversion. Plant-parasitic nematodes decreased only after the first year of the restoration treatments and predators decreased during all 3 years. Nematode indicators showed only a few differences between the different management regimes; the diversity weighted abundance expressed as biomass indicated that the restoration practices sometimes represented a disturbing factor in ecosystem services regulation. The abundance of nematode taxa was differently affected by soil physico-chemical properties. On the farm that had been managed organically for longer, the higher proportion of large sized stable aggregates and greater soil porosity benefitted large nematodes such as predators, while the higher moisture levels were unfavourable for some plant-parasitic nematodes. However, on the farm still in conversion, increases in TOC and C/N ratio values were associated with a reduction in plant-parasitic nematodes.","PeriodicalId":8904,"journal":{"name":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","volume":"39 1","pages":"149 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2023.2179940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Inappropriate land preparation before vineyard establishment can lead to soil degradation and vine health issues, with consequent reductions in the quantity and quality of the grapes. In the present short-term trial, the effects of dry mulching, green manure and compost treatments were evaluated as restoration strategies to enhance soil functionality in degraded vineyard areas at two Tuscan farms that had been under organic management for different lengths of time. Soil nematode community, soil physical and chemical properties were monitored as indicators of soil quality. The restoration treatments scarcely affected soil chemical or physical qualities; only the compost application increased soil total organic carbon (TOC). Bacterial feeder nematodes increased under dry mulching in response to the organic carbon inputs on the farm in conversion. Plant-parasitic nematodes decreased only after the first year of the restoration treatments and predators decreased during all 3 years. Nematode indicators showed only a few differences between the different management regimes; the diversity weighted abundance expressed as biomass indicated that the restoration practices sometimes represented a disturbing factor in ecosystem services regulation. The abundance of nematode taxa was differently affected by soil physico-chemical properties. On the farm that had been managed organically for longer, the higher proportion of large sized stable aggregates and greater soil porosity benefitted large nematodes such as predators, while the higher moisture levels were unfavourable for some plant-parasitic nematodes. However, on the farm still in conversion, increases in TOC and C/N ratio values were associated with a reduction in plant-parasitic nematodes.
托斯卡纳(意大利)两种葡萄园土壤线虫群落结构对不同恢复措施的响应
在葡萄园建立之前,不适当的土地准备会导致土壤退化和葡萄藤健康问题,从而导致葡萄数量和质量的下降。在目前的短期试验中,在两个托斯卡纳农场进行了不同时间的有机管理,评估了干覆盖、绿肥和堆肥处理作为恢复策略的效果,以提高退化葡萄园区土壤的功能。监测土壤线虫群落、土壤理化性质作为土壤质量指标。修复处理对土壤理化性质影响不大;仅施用堆肥增加了土壤总有机碳(TOC)。干地膜下细菌食料线虫数量的增加是对农田有机碳输入的响应。植物寄生线虫只在恢复后的第一年有所减少,而捕食者在3年内均有所减少。线虫指标显示,不同管理制度之间的差异很小;以生物量表示的多样性加权丰度表明,恢复措施有时会成为生态系统服务调节的干扰因素。土壤理化性质对线虫类群丰度的影响不同。在有机管理时间较长的农场,较高比例的大型稳定团聚体和较大的土壤孔隙度有利于大型线虫,如捕食者,而较高的湿度水平不利于某些植物寄生线虫。然而,在仍处于转化阶段的农场,TOC和C/N比值值的增加与植物寄生线虫的减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Agriculture & Horticulture aims to act as the central focus for a wide range of studies into alternative systems of husbandry, and particularly the biological or organic approach to food production. The Journal publishes work of a sound scientific or economic nature related to any aspect of biological husbandry in agriculture, horticulture and forestry in both temperate and tropical conditions, including energy and water utilization, and environmental impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信