Early Palliative Care for Improving Quality of Life and Survival in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

F. Zanghelini, I. Zimmermann, C. Andrade, O. Wu
{"title":"Early Palliative Care for Improving Quality of Life and Survival in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"F. Zanghelini, I. Zimmermann, C. Andrade, O. Wu","doi":"10.4172/2165-7386.1000343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The main goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of early palliative care in patients with advanced cancer.Methods: The search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, CRD, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted in June 2017. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts with consensus agreement. We undertook quality assessment according to GRADE criteria. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness of EPC in adult patients with a diagnosisadvanced cancer were included. The quantitative evidence was summarized in a meta-analysis using random effect models.Results: The selection phase retrieved 14,026 records, 7 papers were included in the meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference the outcomes assessed were: improvement quality of life (0.17 higher; 95% CI; 0.05, 0.29) after 3 months, (0.42 higher; 95% CI; 0.21, 0.63) after 6 months, and (0.16 higher; 95% CI; -0.20, 0.53) after 12 months; improvement of symptom intensity (-0.13 lower; 95% CI; -0.26, 0.00) after 3 months, (-0.27 lower; 95% CI; -0.53, -0.01) after 6 months, and (-0.39 lower; 95% CI; -0.76, -0.03) after 12 months; improve depressive mood (-0.19 lower; 95% CI; - 0.36, -0.01) after 3 months, (-0.21 lower; 95% CI; -0.45, 0.04) after 6 months, and (-0.09 lower; 95% CI; -0.81, 0.63) after 12 months; and survival (OR = 0.71 higher; 95% CI; 0.51, 0.99).Conclusion: Our findings suggest that EPC effectively improves quality of life and consequently increases the likelihood of survival of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. However, due to worsening of the disease stage over time, a limited effect was observed after 12 months of follow-up.","PeriodicalId":91127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","volume":"08 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7386.1000343","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7386.1000343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: The main goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of early palliative care in patients with advanced cancer.Methods: The search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, CRD, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted in June 2017. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts with consensus agreement. We undertook quality assessment according to GRADE criteria. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness of EPC in adult patients with a diagnosisadvanced cancer were included. The quantitative evidence was summarized in a meta-analysis using random effect models.Results: The selection phase retrieved 14,026 records, 7 papers were included in the meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference the outcomes assessed were: improvement quality of life (0.17 higher; 95% CI; 0.05, 0.29) after 3 months, (0.42 higher; 95% CI; 0.21, 0.63) after 6 months, and (0.16 higher; 95% CI; -0.20, 0.53) after 12 months; improvement of symptom intensity (-0.13 lower; 95% CI; -0.26, 0.00) after 3 months, (-0.27 lower; 95% CI; -0.53, -0.01) after 6 months, and (-0.39 lower; 95% CI; -0.76, -0.03) after 12 months; improve depressive mood (-0.19 lower; 95% CI; - 0.36, -0.01) after 3 months, (-0.21 lower; 95% CI; -0.45, 0.04) after 6 months, and (-0.09 lower; 95% CI; -0.81, 0.63) after 12 months; and survival (OR = 0.71 higher; 95% CI; 0.51, 0.99).Conclusion: Our findings suggest that EPC effectively improves quality of life and consequently increases the likelihood of survival of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. However, due to worsening of the disease stage over time, a limited effect was observed after 12 months of follow-up.
早期姑息治疗改善晚期癌症患者的生活质量和生存:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:评价晚期癌症患者早期姑息治疗的有效性。方法:2017年6月在MEDLINE/PubMed、CRD、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、EMBASE、Google Scholar、ICTRP和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中进行搜索。两位评审员在一致同意的情况下独立筛选标题和摘要。我们根据GRADE标准进行了质量评估。纳入随机对照试验(RCT),评估EPC在诊断为晚期癌症的成年患者中的有效性。定量证据在使用随机效应模型的荟萃分析中进行了总结。结果:筛选阶段共检索到14026条记录,7篇论文被纳入荟萃分析。评估结果的标准化平均差异为:3个月后生活质量改善(0.17高;95%置信区间;0.050.29),6个月后(0.42高;95%可信区间;0.210.63),12个月后改善(0.16高;95%CI;-0.200.53);3个月后症状强度改善(-0.13降低;95%置信区间;-0.26,0.00),6个月后(-0.27降低;95%可信区间;-0.53,-0.01),12个月后改善(-0.39降低;95%CI;-0.76,-0.03);在3个月后改善抑郁情绪(降低-0.19;95%置信区间;-0.36,-0.01),在6个月后(降低-0.21;95%可信区间;-0.45,0.04),在12个月后,(降低-0.09;95%CI;-0.81,0.63);结论:我们的研究结果表明,EPC有效地改善了生活质量,从而增加了晚期或转移性癌症患者的生存可能性。然而,由于疾病阶段随着时间的推移而恶化,在随访12个月后观察到的效果有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信