Herbicide mixtures for post-emergence control of horseweed in coffee interrow

IF 0.2 Q4 AGRONOMY
Breno Ribeiro Bornelli, Chayenne de Lira Ferreira, Carlos Henrique de Sousa Ferreira, S. Carvalho
{"title":"Herbicide mixtures for post-emergence control of horseweed in coffee interrow","authors":"Breno Ribeiro Bornelli, Chayenne de Lira Ferreira, Carlos Henrique de Sousa Ferreira, S. Carvalho","doi":"10.18406/2316-1817v14n120221656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glyphosate-resistant biotypes of horseweed (Conyza spp.) have been a constant problematic for coffee growers all over Brazil. Therefore, this work was developed with the objective of evaluating efficacy of different herbicides, applied isolated or in mixture, for horseweed control in coffee plantation interrows.  A field trial was performed with the following treatments (g ha-1): glyphosate at 925, glufosinate-ammonium (GA) at 500, saflufenacil at 49, flumioxazin at 50, glyphosate + GA (925 + 500), glyphosate + saflufenacil (925 + 49), glyphosate + flumioxazin (925 + 50), GA + saflufenacil (500 + 49), GA + flumioxazin (500 + 50) and glyphosate + saflufenacil + clethodim (925 + 49 + 108), besides check plots without herbicide application.  The treatment with clethodim was included considering a possible concomitant presence of sourgrass (Digitaria insularis (L) Fedde) in the areas.  At the moment of herbicide application, horseweed was 40 cm tall in pre-flowering.  Percent control was evaluated at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after application (DAA), as well as mass of dry matter at 28 DAA.  In general, adequate control of horseweed was obtained with glufosinate-ammonium applications, isolated or in mixture with glyphosate, saflufenacil or flumioxazin. Mixture of glyphosate and saflufenacil has also reached high control of horseweed infestation, without difference to GA treatments.  As conclusion, horseweed infestations in coffee interrow may be efficiently controlled with tank mixtures of herbicide.","PeriodicalId":43096,"journal":{"name":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817v14n120221656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant biotypes of horseweed (Conyza spp.) have been a constant problematic for coffee growers all over Brazil. Therefore, this work was developed with the objective of evaluating efficacy of different herbicides, applied isolated or in mixture, for horseweed control in coffee plantation interrows.  A field trial was performed with the following treatments (g ha-1): glyphosate at 925, glufosinate-ammonium (GA) at 500, saflufenacil at 49, flumioxazin at 50, glyphosate + GA (925 + 500), glyphosate + saflufenacil (925 + 49), glyphosate + flumioxazin (925 + 50), GA + saflufenacil (500 + 49), GA + flumioxazin (500 + 50) and glyphosate + saflufenacil + clethodim (925 + 49 + 108), besides check plots without herbicide application.  The treatment with clethodim was included considering a possible concomitant presence of sourgrass (Digitaria insularis (L) Fedde) in the areas.  At the moment of herbicide application, horseweed was 40 cm tall in pre-flowering.  Percent control was evaluated at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after application (DAA), as well as mass of dry matter at 28 DAA.  In general, adequate control of horseweed was obtained with glufosinate-ammonium applications, isolated or in mixture with glyphosate, saflufenacil or flumioxazin. Mixture of glyphosate and saflufenacil has also reached high control of horseweed infestation, without difference to GA treatments.  As conclusion, horseweed infestations in coffee interrow may be efficiently controlled with tank mixtures of herbicide.
混合除草剂对咖啡地杂草出苗后的控制
对巴西各地的咖啡种植者来说,抗草甘膦的杂草(Conyza spp.)一直是一个问题。因此,开展这项工作的目的是评估不同除草剂(单独或混合使用)对咖啡种植园杂草的控制效果。采用以下处理(g ha-1)进行了田间试验:925的草甘膦、500的草膦酸铵(GA)、49的沙氟那嗪、50的氟米沙嗪、925+500的草甘膦+GA、925+49的草甘膦+氟米沙津、500+49的GA+沙氟那津、500+50的GA+氟米沙嗪和925+49+108的草甘膦+沙氟那嗪,除未施用除草剂的对照地块外。考虑到该地区可能同时存在酸草(岛状Digitaria islandis(L)Fedde),包括克雷托丁治疗。在施用除草剂的那一刻,马鞭草在开花前有40厘米高。在施用后7、14、21和28天(DAA)评估对照百分比,以及在28天评估干物质质量。一般来说,使用单独使用或与草甘膦、沙氟醚或氟灭嗪混合使用的草酸盐铵可以获得对马鞭草的充分控制。草甘膦和黄曲霉素的混合物也达到了对马鞭草侵扰的高度控制,与GA处理没有差异。因此,咖啡种植区的杂草侵扰可以通过混合除草剂有效控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信