“Anti-Regime Influentials” Across Platforms: A Case Study of the Free Navalny Protests in Russia

IF 2.7 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
S. Glazunova, Malmi Amadoru
{"title":"“Anti-Regime Influentials” Across Platforms: A Case Study of the Free Navalny Protests in Russia","authors":"S. Glazunova, Malmi Amadoru","doi":"10.17645/mac.v11i3.6643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in 2022 has put the future of the Russian opposition further at stake. The new limitations towards political, internet, and press freedoms have led to a severe disintegration of the anti-regime movement in Russia, including its leaders like Alexey Navalny. Digital platforms had previously hosted anti-Kremlin narratives online and played a role in the facilitation of Russian anti-regime protests. The latest scalable anti-regime rallies to date were the Free Navalny protests, caused by the imprisonment of Navalny in 2021. Digital platforms strengthened the voice of the Russian regime critics; however, their growing visibility online caused further suppression in the country. To understand this paradox, we ask which main anti-regime communicators were influential in the protests’ discussions on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook, and how platform features have facilitated their influence during the Free Navalny protests. We develop a multi-platform methodological workflow comprising network analysis, social media analytics, and qualitative methods to map the Russian anti-regime publics and identify its opinion leaders. We also evaluate the cultures of use of platforms and their features by various Russian anti-regime communicators seeking high visibility online. We distinguish between contextual and feature cultures of platform use that potentially aid the popularity of such actors and propose to cautiously confer the mobilisation and democratisation potential to digital platforms under growing authoritarianism.","PeriodicalId":18348,"journal":{"name":"Media and Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in 2022 has put the future of the Russian opposition further at stake. The new limitations towards political, internet, and press freedoms have led to a severe disintegration of the anti-regime movement in Russia, including its leaders like Alexey Navalny. Digital platforms had previously hosted anti-Kremlin narratives online and played a role in the facilitation of Russian anti-regime protests. The latest scalable anti-regime rallies to date were the Free Navalny protests, caused by the imprisonment of Navalny in 2021. Digital platforms strengthened the voice of the Russian regime critics; however, their growing visibility online caused further suppression in the country. To understand this paradox, we ask which main anti-regime communicators were influential in the protests’ discussions on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook, and how platform features have facilitated their influence during the Free Navalny protests. We develop a multi-platform methodological workflow comprising network analysis, social media analytics, and qualitative methods to map the Russian anti-regime publics and identify its opinion leaders. We also evaluate the cultures of use of platforms and their features by various Russian anti-regime communicators seeking high visibility online. We distinguish between contextual and feature cultures of platform use that potentially aid the popularity of such actors and propose to cautiously confer the mobilisation and democratisation potential to digital platforms under growing authoritarianism.
跨平台的“反政权影响”——以俄罗斯纳瓦尔尼自由抗议活动为例
2022年俄罗斯对乌克兰的全面入侵使俄罗斯反对派的未来进一步岌岌可危。对政治、互联网和新闻自由的新限制导致了俄罗斯反政权运动的严重瓦解,包括其领导人阿列克谢·纳瓦尔尼(Alexey Navalny)。此前,数字平台曾在网上发布反克里姆林宫的言论,并在促进俄罗斯反政府抗议活动方面发挥了作用。到目前为止,最新的大规模反政府集会是2021年纳瓦尔尼被监禁引发的“自由纳瓦尔尼”抗议活动。数字平台加强了俄罗斯政权批评者的声音;然而,他们在网上的知名度越来越高,导致该国进一步压制。为了理解这一悖论,我们要问哪些主要的反政府传播者在Twitter、YouTube和Facebook上的抗议讨论中具有影响力,以及平台功能如何在自由纳瓦尔尼抗议期间促进了他们的影响力。我们开发了一个多平台的方法论工作流程,包括网络分析、社交媒体分析和定性方法,以绘制俄罗斯反政府公众的地图并确定其意见领袖。我们还评估了各种寻求在线高知名度的俄罗斯反政府传播者使用平台的文化及其特征。我们区分了平台使用的背景文化和特征文化,这些文化可能有助于这些行动者的普及,并建议在日益增长的威权主义下谨慎地赋予数字平台动员和民主化的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media and Communication
Media and Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) is an international open access journal dedicated to a wide variety of basic and applied research in communication and its related fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信