A methodological scoping review of qualitative research on LGBTQ + bullying victimization: Implications for diversity, equity, and inclusion

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL WORK

JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI:10.1080/10538720.2022.2044424

Peter A. Newman, L. Reid, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, S. Tepjan, Susan Ramsundarsingh

{"title":"A methodological scoping review of qualitative research on LGBTQ + bullying victimization: Implications for diversity, equity, and inclusion","authors":"Peter A. Newman, L. Reid, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, S. Tepjan, Susan Ramsundarsingh","doi":"10.1080/10538720.2022.2044424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We conducted a scoping review in accordance with Cochrane guidelines to identify participant and methodological characteristics of qualitative research conducted with young people on LGBTQ + bullying victimization. From 2005 to 2020, we identified 1,579 abstracts, with 141 articles retained for full-text screening and 35 included in the review. Overall, participants (N = 884) were predominantly white (50%), cisgender male (51%), and gay (38%); 14% identified as transgender or gender nonconforming, 13% bisexual, 6% queer or questioning, and 1% asexual. Half of participants identified as ethnic/racial minorities. Most studies (51%) took place in exclusively urban, 17% mixed urban/rural, 3% exclusively rural, and 29% unspecified contexts. Overall, 43% were conducted in the US. Seventeen percent of studies focused exclusively on adolescents under age 18, while 43% excluded this population. Study methodologies included ethnography, grounded theory, phenomenology, and narrative, with nearly one-third unspecified. We outline recommendations for sampling, data collection, and data analysis, researcher self-disclosure, and ethical considerations, for increasing diversity and inclusion in intersectional approaches to LGBTQ + bullying research.","PeriodicalId":46685,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2022.2044424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract We conducted a scoping review in accordance with Cochrane guidelines to identify participant and methodological characteristics of qualitative research conducted with young people on LGBTQ + bullying victimization. From 2005 to 2020, we identified 1,579 abstracts, with 141 articles retained for full-text screening and 35 included in the review. Overall, participants (N = 884) were predominantly white (50%), cisgender male (51%), and gay (38%); 14% identified as transgender or gender nonconforming, 13% bisexual, 6% queer or questioning, and 1% asexual. Half of participants identified as ethnic/racial minorities. Most studies (51%) took place in exclusively urban, 17% mixed urban/rural, 3% exclusively rural, and 29% unspecified contexts. Overall, 43% were conducted in the US. Seventeen percent of studies focused exclusively on adolescents under age 18, while 43% excluded this population. Study methodologies included ethnography, grounded theory, phenomenology, and narrative, with nearly one-third unspecified. We outline recommendations for sampling, data collection, and data analysis, researcher self-disclosure, and ethical considerations, for increasing diversity and inclusion in intersectional approaches to LGBTQ + bullying research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

LGBTQ定性研究的方法论范围综述 + 欺凌受害：对多样性、公平性和包容性的影响

摘要我们根据Cochrane指南进行了范围界定审查，以确定对年轻人进行的关于LGBTQ的定性研究的参与者和方法学特征 + 欺凌受害者。从2005年到2020年，我们确定了1579篇摘要，其中141篇文章保留全文筛选，35篇纳入综述。总体而言，参与者（N = 884）主要是白人（50%）、顺性别男性（51%）和同性恋（38%）；14%被认定为跨性别或性别不合，13%为双性恋，6%为酷儿或质疑者，1%为无性恋。半数参与者被认定为少数民族/种族。大多数研究（51%）仅在城市进行，17%在城市/农村混合进行，3%在农村进行，29%在未指明的背景下进行。总体而言，43%的研究是在美国进行的。17%的研究只关注18岁以下的青少年，而43%的研究将这一人群排除在外。研究方法包括民族志、扎根理论、现象学和叙事，其中近三分之一未指明。我们概述了采样、数据收集和数据分析、研究人员自我披露和道德考虑的建议，以增加跨部门LGBTQ方法的多样性和包容性 + 欺凌研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES SOCIAL WORK-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services provides empirical knowledge and conceptual information related to sexual minorities and their social environment. Filled with innovative ideas and resources for the design, evaluation, and delivery of social services for these populations at all stages of life, the journal is a positive influence on the development of public and social policy, programs and services, and social work practice. Dedicated to the development of knowledge which meets the practical needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people in their social context, the Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services is a forum for studying.