PATENCY RATE OF BRACHIOCEPHALIC VS RADIOCEPHALIC AVF IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS IN POPULATION OF D.I.KHAN DIVISION, PAKISTAN

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Waseem Ahmad, Saqibah Rehman, M. Aamir, Dastgeer Waheed
{"title":"PATENCY RATE OF BRACHIOCEPHALIC VS RADIOCEPHALIC AVF IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS IN POPULATION OF D.I.KHAN DIVISION, PAKISTAN","authors":"Waseem Ahmad, Saqibah Rehman, M. Aamir, Dastgeer Waheed","doi":"10.46903/gjms/20.01.1094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: All patients with chronic renal failure need vascular access for hemodialysis that is possible with CVP line but it can be retained for only 02-03weeks due to infection. The most suitable and effective vascular access on long term basis is the creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The objective of this study was to compare the patency rate of Radiocephalic vs Brachiocephalic AVFs in population of D.I.Khan division, Pakistan.\n\nMaterials & Methods: This randomized controlled trail was conducted in the surgical unit at District Headquarter Teaching Hospital D.I.Khan, Pakistan from January 2017 to January 2020. Two hundred and sixty six patients were randomly allocated by toss method into two groups, one for Brachiocephalic AVF (BCAVF) and second for Radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF). Sex & patency rates were our nominal while age grouping was our ordinal variable. The data for the sample was described by count & percentages & was analyzed for the population as confidence interval at 80% confidence level. McNemar chi-square test was used to test hypothesis to compare the patency rate of Brachiocephalic AVF vs. Radiocephalic AVF at alpha 0.05 with Yates continuity correction using online statistical calculator.\n\nResults: The patency was present in 129 (97%, 80% CI 94.45-98.39%) cases & absent in 4 (3%, 80% CI 1.61-5.55%) cases in Brachiocephalic AVF group while it was present in 107 (80.5%, 80% CI 76.04-84.86%) cases & absent in 26 (19.5%, 80% CI 15.52-24.32%) cases in Radiocephalic AVF group. McNemar chi-square test showed p-value of <.0001 (less than alpha). So, the null hypothesis was rejected, showing significant difference between two groups.\n\nConclusion: Brachiocephalic AVF creation is more ideal in terms of patency and maturation as compare to Radiocephalic AVF because of increased vessel diameter and increased arterial pressure at proximal site below elbow joint.","PeriodicalId":44174,"journal":{"name":"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46903/gjms/20.01.1094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: All patients with chronic renal failure need vascular access for hemodialysis that is possible with CVP line but it can be retained for only 02-03weeks due to infection. The most suitable and effective vascular access on long term basis is the creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The objective of this study was to compare the patency rate of Radiocephalic vs Brachiocephalic AVFs in population of D.I.Khan division, Pakistan. Materials & Methods: This randomized controlled trail was conducted in the surgical unit at District Headquarter Teaching Hospital D.I.Khan, Pakistan from January 2017 to January 2020. Two hundred and sixty six patients were randomly allocated by toss method into two groups, one for Brachiocephalic AVF (BCAVF) and second for Radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF). Sex & patency rates were our nominal while age grouping was our ordinal variable. The data for the sample was described by count & percentages & was analyzed for the population as confidence interval at 80% confidence level. McNemar chi-square test was used to test hypothesis to compare the patency rate of Brachiocephalic AVF vs. Radiocephalic AVF at alpha 0.05 with Yates continuity correction using online statistical calculator. Results: The patency was present in 129 (97%, 80% CI 94.45-98.39%) cases & absent in 4 (3%, 80% CI 1.61-5.55%) cases in Brachiocephalic AVF group while it was present in 107 (80.5%, 80% CI 76.04-84.86%) cases & absent in 26 (19.5%, 80% CI 15.52-24.32%) cases in Radiocephalic AVF group. McNemar chi-square test showed p-value of <.0001 (less than alpha). So, the null hypothesis was rejected, showing significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: Brachiocephalic AVF creation is more ideal in terms of patency and maturation as compare to Radiocephalic AVF because of increased vessel diameter and increased arterial pressure at proximal site below elbow joint.
巴基斯坦d.i.khan地区人群慢性肾脏病患者臂头与放射性头avf的通畅率
背景:所有慢性肾衰竭患者都需要血管通路进行血液透析,这是CVP系的可能,但由于感染,只能保留02-03周。最合适和有效的长期血管通路是建立动静脉瘘(AVF)。本研究的目的是比较巴基斯坦dii khan地区人群中放射性头型和臂头型avf的通畅率。材料与方法:该随机对照试验于2017年1月至2020年1月在巴基斯坦dii khan区总部教学医院外科进行。采用抛掷法将266例患者随机分为头臂性AVF (BCAVF)组和桡头性AVF (RCAVF)组。性别和通畅率是我们的名义变量,而年龄分组是我们的顺序变量。样本的数据用计数和百分比来描述,并以80%置信水平的置信区间对总体进行分析。采用McNemar卡方检验检验假设,在alpha 0.05下比较头臂部AVF与桡头部AVF的通畅率,并使用在线统计计算器进行Yates连续性校正。结果:头臂型AVF组有129例(97%,80% CI 94.45 ~ 98.39%)通畅,无4例(3%,80% CI 1.61 ~ 5.55%)通畅;放射性头头型AVF组有107例(80.5%,80% CI 76.04 ~ 84.86%)通畅,无26例(19.5%,80% CI 15.52 ~ 24.32%)通畅。McNemar卡方检验显示p值< 0.0001(小于)。因此,零假设被拒绝,两组之间存在显著性差异。结论:由于肘关节以下近端血管直径增大,动脉压增高,头臂侧AVF的通畅和成熟程度较头桡侧AVF更理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
80.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信