Decent work in care homes: lessons and implications of the pandemic experience from Scotland

Q3 Nursing
Stephen Gibb, Hartwig Pautz
{"title":"Decent work in care homes: lessons and implications of the pandemic experience from Scotland","authors":"Stephen Gibb, Hartwig Pautz","doi":"10.1108/wwop-02-2022-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to identify lessons and implications on the theme of decent work in social care. This has long been highlighted as integral to improving social care for the elderly. The COVID-19 pandemic experience reveals lessons and implications about the systemic absence of decent work in one place, Scotland, in care homes. The main lesson and implication is a need for change beyond the focus on levels of pay and systemic advocacy of decent work as it is conventionally understood.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData was collected using qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 20 care workers in care homes.[AQ4] A range of care system institutional stakeholders was also interviewed. A range of care system institutional stakeholders was also interviewed.\n\n\nFindings\nDecent work in social care may only be progressed to the extent that a culture change is achieved, transcending the institutional stasis about who owns and engages with progressing decent work.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis is a study in one place, Scotland, with a small sample of frontline care workers in care homes and representatives from a range of institutions.\n\n\nPractical implications\nEffective culture change for decent work in care homes needs to be a higher research priority. More explicit culture policies can be a mechanism by which overall decent work and system change may be catalysed and sustainably secured together. Explicit culture change is here set out with respect to operational, institutional and national domains.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThere needs to be social policy and political support for situating decent work to be part of a broader culture change around care work with the elderly. A culture-oriented change plan as well as new resourcing and structures can together ensure that the nadir of the pandemic experience was a historical turning point towards transformation rather than being just another low point in a recurring cycle.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe situating of systemic decent work progress within a broader culture change, and modelling that culture change, are original contributions.\n","PeriodicalId":53659,"journal":{"name":"Working with Older People","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working with Older People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-02-2022-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify lessons and implications on the theme of decent work in social care. This has long been highlighted as integral to improving social care for the elderly. The COVID-19 pandemic experience reveals lessons and implications about the systemic absence of decent work in one place, Scotland, in care homes. The main lesson and implication is a need for change beyond the focus on levels of pay and systemic advocacy of decent work as it is conventionally understood. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected using qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 20 care workers in care homes.[AQ4] A range of care system institutional stakeholders was also interviewed. A range of care system institutional stakeholders was also interviewed. Findings Decent work in social care may only be progressed to the extent that a culture change is achieved, transcending the institutional stasis about who owns and engages with progressing decent work. Research limitations/implications This is a study in one place, Scotland, with a small sample of frontline care workers in care homes and representatives from a range of institutions. Practical implications Effective culture change for decent work in care homes needs to be a higher research priority. More explicit culture policies can be a mechanism by which overall decent work and system change may be catalysed and sustainably secured together. Explicit culture change is here set out with respect to operational, institutional and national domains. Social implications There needs to be social policy and political support for situating decent work to be part of a broader culture change around care work with the elderly. A culture-oriented change plan as well as new resourcing and structures can together ensure that the nadir of the pandemic experience was a historical turning point towards transformation rather than being just another low point in a recurring cycle. Originality/value The situating of systemic decent work progress within a broader culture change, and modelling that culture change, are original contributions.
护理院的体面工作:苏格兰疫情经验的教训和影响
本文的目的是确定社会关怀中体面工作主题的教训和影响。长期以来,这一直被强调为改善老年人社会护理的组成部分。2019冠状病毒病大流行的经验揭示了一个地方——苏格兰养老院系统性缺乏体面工作的教训和影响。主要的教训和影响是需要改变,而不是像传统理解的那样注重薪酬水平和有系统地倡导体面工作。设计/方法/方法采用对20名护理院护理员进行定性、半结构化访谈的方法收集数据。[AQ4]还采访了一系列护理系统机构利益相关者。还采访了一系列护理系统机构利益相关者。研究结果:只有实现文化变革,超越关于谁拥有和参与体面工作的制度停滞,社会护理领域的体面工作才能取得进展。研究的局限性/意义这是一项在苏格兰一个地方进行的研究,研究对象是护理院的一线护理人员和来自一系列机构的代表。对养老院体面工作的有效文化变革需要成为一个更高的研究重点。更明确的文化政策可以成为一种机制,通过这种机制,可以促进整体体面工作和制度变革,并可持续地共同得到保障。这里明确阐述了业务、机构和国家领域的文化变革。社会影响需要有社会政策和政治支持,使体面工作成为围绕老年人护理工作的更广泛文化变革的一部分。以文化为导向的变革计划以及新的资源和结构可以共同确保大流行病经历的最低点是走向变革的历史转折点,而不仅仅是反复循环中的另一个低点。原创性/价值将系统化的体面工作进展置于更广泛的文化变革之中,并对文化变革进行建模,是原创性贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Working with Older People
Working with Older People Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信