Risk-taking under time-sensitivity in Sino-Pak negotiation in the context of the BRI project

IF 1.3 Q4 MANAGEMENT
T. Malik, Qiusha Liang, Yanzhi Zhao, K. Nielsen
{"title":"Risk-taking under time-sensitivity in Sino-Pak negotiation in the context of the BRI project","authors":"T. Malik, Qiusha Liang, Yanzhi Zhao, K. Nielsen","doi":"10.1177/03063070231167288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China and Pakistan took part in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) project through CPEC (China–Pakistan Economic Corridor), but it faced many challenges at the negotiation and implementation stages. While their firms and individuals have come closer to exploring the scope and scales of opportunities, they have faced difficulties associated with uncertainty and time (risk-taking behaviour directly and indirectly through time sensitivity). Culturally, the potential differences in the risk orientation are plausible, but the contextualised differences in the negotiation process are not clear at the style level of analysis. This article explores whether how and why the negotiation style of China and Pakistan differs despite the visible values ahead of them. Based on postgraduate students in business schools, we investigated the notion of risk-taking orientation and moderation of the time sensitivity to both sides. The survey was based on 1398 participants: 917 (66%) Chinese and 481 (34%) Pakistani participants responded to risk-taking (low-high) and time sensitivity (low-high). The results are consistent across models. Directly, Chinese negotiators are more risk-takers than Pakistani negotiators. Indirectly, time-sensitive Chinese negotiators are low risk-takers than time-sensitive Pakistani negotiators. The study extends the risk orientation and time-sensitivity in perceptual assumptions in the cultural context.","PeriodicalId":46142,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231167288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China and Pakistan took part in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) project through CPEC (China–Pakistan Economic Corridor), but it faced many challenges at the negotiation and implementation stages. While their firms and individuals have come closer to exploring the scope and scales of opportunities, they have faced difficulties associated with uncertainty and time (risk-taking behaviour directly and indirectly through time sensitivity). Culturally, the potential differences in the risk orientation are plausible, but the contextualised differences in the negotiation process are not clear at the style level of analysis. This article explores whether how and why the negotiation style of China and Pakistan differs despite the visible values ahead of them. Based on postgraduate students in business schools, we investigated the notion of risk-taking orientation and moderation of the time sensitivity to both sides. The survey was based on 1398 participants: 917 (66%) Chinese and 481 (34%) Pakistani participants responded to risk-taking (low-high) and time sensitivity (low-high). The results are consistent across models. Directly, Chinese negotiators are more risk-takers than Pakistani negotiators. Indirectly, time-sensitive Chinese negotiators are low risk-takers than time-sensitive Pakistani negotiators. The study extends the risk orientation and time-sensitivity in perceptual assumptions in the cultural context.
“一带一路”项目背景下中巴谈判时间敏感性下的风险承担
中国和巴基斯坦通过中巴经济走廊参与了“一带一路”倡议,但在谈判和实施阶段面临诸多挑战。虽然他们的公司和个人更接近于探索机会的范围和规模,但他们面临着与不确定性和时间(通过时间敏感性直接或间接地承担风险的行为)相关的困难。文化上,风险导向的潜在差异是合理的,但在风格层面的分析中,谈判过程中的语境差异并不清楚。本文探讨了中国和巴基斯坦的谈判风格如何以及为什么不同,尽管他们面前有明显的价值观。我们以商学院研究生为研究对象,考察了风险偏好的概念和对双方的时间敏感性的调节。该调查基于1398名参与者:917名(66%)中国人和481名(34%)巴基斯坦参与者对冒险(低-高)和时间敏感性(低-高)做出了回应。各模型的结果是一致的。直接地说,中国谈判代表比巴基斯坦谈判代表更愿意冒险。间接地说,对时间敏感的中国谈判者比对时间敏感的巴基斯坦谈判者更不愿意冒险。本研究扩展了文化背景下感知假设中的风险取向和时间敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Journal of General Management is quarterly peer reviewed journal, with a mission to provide thought leadership by publishing articles on managerial practices with organisation-wide or cross-functional implications. We seek original theoretical and practical insights into general management in all types of organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信