A Machine Learning Approach to Analyzing the Relationship Between Temperatures and Multi-Proxy Tree-Ring Records

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
J. Jevšenak, S. Džeroski, S. Zavadlav, T. Levanič
{"title":"A Machine Learning Approach to Analyzing the Relationship Between Temperatures and Multi-Proxy Tree-Ring Records","authors":"J. Jevšenak, S. Džeroski, S. Zavadlav, T. Levanič","doi":"10.3959/1536-1098-74.2.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Machine learning (ML) is a widely unexplored field in dendroclimatology, but it is a powerful tool that might improve the accuracy of climate reconstructions. In this paper, different ML algorithms are compared to climate reconstruction from tree-ring proxies. The algorithms considered are multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), model trees (MT), bagging of model trees (BMT), and random forests of regression trees (RF). April-May mean temperature at a Quercus robur stand in Slovenia is predicted with mean vessel area (MVA, correlation coefficient with April-May mean temperature, r = 0.70, p < 0.001) and earlywood width (EW, r = –0.28, p < 0.05). Similarly, June-August mean temperature is predicted with stable carbon isotope (δ13C, r = 0.72, p < 0.001), stable oxygen isotope (δ18O, r = 0.32, p < 0.05) and tree-ring width (TRW, r = 0.11, p > 0.05 (ns)) chronologies. The predictive performance of ML algorithms was estimated by 3-fold cross-validation repeated 100 times. In both spring and summer temperature models, BMT performed best respectively in 62% and 52% of the 100 repetitions. The second-best method was ANN. Although BMT gave the best validation results, the differences in the models’ performances were minor. We therefore recommend always comparing different ML regression techniques and selecting the optimal one for applications in dendroclimatology.","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"74 1","pages":"210 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3959/1536-1098-74.2.210","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-74.2.210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) is a widely unexplored field in dendroclimatology, but it is a powerful tool that might improve the accuracy of climate reconstructions. In this paper, different ML algorithms are compared to climate reconstruction from tree-ring proxies. The algorithms considered are multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), model trees (MT), bagging of model trees (BMT), and random forests of regression trees (RF). April-May mean temperature at a Quercus robur stand in Slovenia is predicted with mean vessel area (MVA, correlation coefficient with April-May mean temperature, r = 0.70, p < 0.001) and earlywood width (EW, r = –0.28, p < 0.05). Similarly, June-August mean temperature is predicted with stable carbon isotope (δ13C, r = 0.72, p < 0.001), stable oxygen isotope (δ18O, r = 0.32, p < 0.05) and tree-ring width (TRW, r = 0.11, p > 0.05 (ns)) chronologies. The predictive performance of ML algorithms was estimated by 3-fold cross-validation repeated 100 times. In both spring and summer temperature models, BMT performed best respectively in 62% and 52% of the 100 repetitions. The second-best method was ANN. Although BMT gave the best validation results, the differences in the models’ performances were minor. We therefore recommend always comparing different ML regression techniques and selecting the optimal one for applications in dendroclimatology.
一种分析温度与多代理树环记录关系的机器学习方法
摘要机器学习(ML)是树木气候学中一个尚未探索的领域,但它是一个强大的工具,可以提高气候重建的准确性。本文将不同的ML算法与基于树环代理的气候重建进行了比较。所考虑的算法是多元线性回归(MLR)、人工神经网络(ANN)、模型树(MT)、模型树木装袋(BMT)和回归树的随机森林(RF)。用平均血管面积(MVA,与4-5月平均温度的相关系数,r=0.70,p<0.001)和早材宽度(EW,r=-0.28,p<0.05)预测斯洛文尼亚粗壮栎林分4-5月平均气温。同样,用稳定碳同位素(δ13C,r=0.72,p<001)预测6-8月平均气温,稳定氧同位素(δ18O,r=0.32,p<0.05)和年轮宽度(TRW,r=0.11,p>0.05(ns))年代。通过重复100次的3倍交叉验证来估计ML算法的预测性能。在春季和夏季温度模型中,BMT在100次重复中分别有62%和52%表现最佳。第二好的方法是ANN。尽管BMT给出了最好的验证结果,但模型的性能差异很小。因此,我们建议始终比较不同的ML回归技术,并选择最适合应用于树木气候学的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree-Ring Research
Tree-Ring Research 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication. Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信