Exploring the precipitators of violent conflict in Central Nigeria: a mixed methodology approach

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
O. Ojewale
{"title":"Exploring the precipitators of violent conflict in Central Nigeria: a mixed methodology approach","authors":"O. Ojewale","doi":"10.1108/JACPR-11-2020-0554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the mutually reinforcing drivers of violent conflict in rural and urban communities in Central Nigeria.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study adopts mixed approach of qualitative and quantitative research methodology through multi-stage sampling technique. This involved the purposive selection of Benue and Plateau States in Central Nigeria. The combination of household data collection and Geographic Information System led to the identification of 2,772, 117, 2,668 and 106 grids in Jos, Barkin Ladi, Makurdi and Gbajimba, respectively. This proportion constituted the clusters where household heads were chosen for questionnaire administration. Furthermore, a total of ten in-depth interviews were conducted.\n\n\nFindings\nThe prominent precipitators of violent conflicts were: rise of criminal groups and criminal activities, hate speech, state’s inability to protect most citizens against violent crime, political intimidation by ruling party, over militarization of the public space. Others are rising population pressure, proliferation of small arms and light weapons and ban of open grazing.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study could be strengthened if broadened to include communities with different socioeconomic realities. Hence, the view presented in this paper may not be considered generalizable to other parts of the country with different cultural settings.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe methodology offers a reliable alternative to combine sampling approaches for household surveys that can help address problems occasioned by the lack of census data.\n","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-11-2020-0554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the mutually reinforcing drivers of violent conflict in rural and urban communities in Central Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts mixed approach of qualitative and quantitative research methodology through multi-stage sampling technique. This involved the purposive selection of Benue and Plateau States in Central Nigeria. The combination of household data collection and Geographic Information System led to the identification of 2,772, 117, 2,668 and 106 grids in Jos, Barkin Ladi, Makurdi and Gbajimba, respectively. This proportion constituted the clusters where household heads were chosen for questionnaire administration. Furthermore, a total of ten in-depth interviews were conducted. Findings The prominent precipitators of violent conflicts were: rise of criminal groups and criminal activities, hate speech, state’s inability to protect most citizens against violent crime, political intimidation by ruling party, over militarization of the public space. Others are rising population pressure, proliferation of small arms and light weapons and ban of open grazing. Research limitations/implications This study could be strengthened if broadened to include communities with different socioeconomic realities. Hence, the view presented in this paper may not be considered generalizable to other parts of the country with different cultural settings. Originality/value The methodology offers a reliable alternative to combine sampling approaches for household surveys that can help address problems occasioned by the lack of census data.
探讨尼日利亚中部暴力冲突的促发因素:一种混合方法
本文的目的是识别和分析尼日利亚中部农村和城市社区暴力冲突的相互加强的驱动因素。设计/方法/方法本研究采用多阶段抽样技术,采用定性和定量研究方法相结合的方法。这涉及有目的地选择尼日利亚中部的贝努埃州和高原州。家庭数据收集与地理信息系统相结合,在乔斯、巴金拉迪、马库尔迪和巴金巴分别确定了2,772、117、2,668和106个网格。这一比例构成了选择户主进行问卷管理的聚类。此外,共进行了10次深入访谈。暴力冲突的主要诱因是:犯罪集团和犯罪活动的兴起,仇恨言论,国家无法保护大多数公民免受暴力犯罪,执政党的政治恐吓,公共空间的军事化。其他问题包括人口压力上升、小武器和轻武器扩散以及禁止露天放牧。研究的局限性/意义如果将研究范围扩大到具有不同社会经济现实的社区,这项研究可能会得到加强。因此,本文提出的观点可能不能被认为适用于具有不同文化背景的国家其他地区。独创性/价值该方法为住户调查提供了一种可靠的替代方法,可以将抽样方法结合起来,帮助解决由于缺乏普查数据而引起的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信