Salicylic Acid Peel and Fusion Peel with Salicylic & Mandelic Acid Peel for Treatment of Acne Scars - A Comparative Study

Monisha B. Muthu, G. Kannan, M. Muthu
{"title":"Salicylic Acid Peel and Fusion Peel with Salicylic & Mandelic Acid Peel for Treatment of Acne Scars - A Comparative Study","authors":"Monisha B. Muthu, G. Kannan, M. Muthu","doi":"10.2478/sjdv-2020-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin diseases affecting more than 85% of individuals worldwide. The study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Salicylic acid peel and Salicylic acid - mandelic acid peel for treatment of acne scars. Material and Methods. A comparative study was conducted on 41 patients, divided into two groups based on treatment choice by the subjects. Group A (23) were treated with 30% salycilic acid peels, and group B (18) were treated with 20% salycilic acid and 10% mandelic acid peels at an interval of 2 weeks for three sessions. The physician’s global assessment scale and clinical photographs were used at the end of three sessions. All the data were analysed using SPSS considering P<0.05 as significant. Results. Of the total 41 patients analyzed, the mean age in both the groups were comparable. (Group A: 20.4 years; Group B: 20.5 years). Duration of acne was >12 months in both the groups 13 (56.52%) & 10 (55.56%)). Thirteen patients (56.52%) in group A and 1 (5.56%) in group B had no side effects which was statistically significant (p=0.01). Using the physician’s global assessment scale 51-75% (Good) an improvement was seen in grade I 4 (17%) and 18 (78%) in grade II in group A and 2 (11%) in grade I and 12 (67%) in grade II in group B, respectively which was statistically significant (p=0.001). Conclusion. Both agents showed almost equal efficacy in improving mild-to-moderate acne scars. Adverse effects were less with Salicylic acid peel compared with mandelic acid peel..","PeriodicalId":30659,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"12 1","pages":"69 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjdv-2020-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin diseases affecting more than 85% of individuals worldwide. The study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Salicylic acid peel and Salicylic acid - mandelic acid peel for treatment of acne scars. Material and Methods. A comparative study was conducted on 41 patients, divided into two groups based on treatment choice by the subjects. Group A (23) were treated with 30% salycilic acid peels, and group B (18) were treated with 20% salycilic acid and 10% mandelic acid peels at an interval of 2 weeks for three sessions. The physician’s global assessment scale and clinical photographs were used at the end of three sessions. All the data were analysed using SPSS considering P<0.05 as significant. Results. Of the total 41 patients analyzed, the mean age in both the groups were comparable. (Group A: 20.4 years; Group B: 20.5 years). Duration of acne was >12 months in both the groups 13 (56.52%) & 10 (55.56%)). Thirteen patients (56.52%) in group A and 1 (5.56%) in group B had no side effects which was statistically significant (p=0.01). Using the physician’s global assessment scale 51-75% (Good) an improvement was seen in grade I 4 (17%) and 18 (78%) in grade II in group A and 2 (11%) in grade I and 12 (67%) in grade II in group B, respectively which was statistically significant (p=0.001). Conclusion. Both agents showed almost equal efficacy in improving mild-to-moderate acne scars. Adverse effects were less with Salicylic acid peel compared with mandelic acid peel..
水杨酸脱皮与融合脱皮联合水杨酸扁桃酸脱皮治疗痤疮疤痕的比较研究
摘要介绍。寻常痤疮是最常见的皮肤病之一,影响全世界85%以上的人。比较水杨酸脱皮与水杨酸-扁桃酸脱皮对痤疮疤痕的治疗效果。材料和方法。对41例患者进行对比研究,根据受试者对治疗方案的选择分为两组。A组(23只)给予30%水杨酸脱皮治疗,B组(18只)给予20%水杨酸和10%扁桃酸脱皮治疗,每隔2周进行3次治疗。在三个疗程结束时使用医生的整体评估量表和临床照片。13组(56.52%)和10组(55.56%)按12个月计算,采用SPSS软件对所有数据进行分析。A组13例(56.52%)无不良反应,B组1例(5.56%)无不良反应,差异有统计学意义(p=0.01)。采用医师整体评估量表51-75%(良好),A组I级改善4例(17%),II级改善18例(78%),B组I级改善2例(11%),II级改善12例(67%),差异均有统计学意义(p=0.001)。结论。两种药物在改善轻度至中度痤疮疤痕方面几乎同样有效。与扁桃酸去皮相比,水杨酸去皮的不良反应较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Serbian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology is a journal of the Serbian Association of Dermatologists and Venereologists. The journal is published in English, quarterly and intended to provide rapid publication of papers in the field of dermatology and venereology. Manuscripts are welcome from all countries in the following categories: editorials, original studies, review articles, professional articles, case reports, and history of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信